2028 Girls Lacrosse

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You must not be a 28 parent. That post had zero toxicity.

Or maybe it was just a very self-aware ‘28 parent?

This thread has made a lot of progress since the restart. We seem to have moved beyond the personal attacks of identifiable individuals, and generally folks are avoiding commenting on individual players. Those are wins.

Would prefer that we not replace that type of clearly unproductive dialogue with some new moralizing strain where anonymous folks drop in comments like "you are all psycho", or "'28 parents are the worst", and so forth. If it doesn't advance the discussion, and sounds like name calling, it's probably not worth writing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You must not be a 28 parent. That post had zero toxicity.

Or maybe it was just a very self-aware ‘28 parent?

This thread has made a lot of progress since the restart. We seem to have moved beyond the personal attacks of identifiable individuals, and generally folks are avoiding commenting on individual players. Those are wins.

Would prefer that we not replace that type of clearly unproductive dialogue with some new moralizing strain where anonymous folks drop in comments like "you are all psycho", or "'28 parents are the worst", and so forth. If it doesn't advance the discussion, and sounds like name calling, it's probably not worth writing.

What do you think about making fun of people who write things like “replace that type of clearly unproductive dialogue with some new moralizing strain” on an anonymous blog?

In my day, we referred to people who spoke like that as “snobs.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You must not be a 28 parent. That post had zero toxicity.

Or maybe it was just a very self-aware ‘28 parent?

This thread has made a lot of progress since the restart. We seem to have moved beyond the personal attacks of identifiable individuals, and generally folks are avoiding commenting on individual players. Those are wins.

Would prefer that we not replace that type of clearly unproductive dialogue with some new moralizing strain where anonymous folks drop in comments like "you are all psycho", or "'28 parents are the worst", and so forth. If it doesn't advance the discussion, and sounds like name calling, it's probably not worth writing.

What do you think about making fun of people who write things like “replace that type of clearly unproductive dialogue with some new moralizing strain” on an anonymous blog?

In my day, we referred to people who spoke like that as “snobs.”

More name calling. Impressive argument. I would offer that the "snobs" are the ones who are suggest participants on a thread are "psycho", while reading and posting on the same thread--not those who can write coherent sentences with precise diction and an actual point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cause everyone is going to remember in 2 years who won some meaningless game on a farm field in rural Maryland at dawn on some random fall Sunday morning. Once you are out of it, it’s more satisfying to say all the college players you played with and see the girls go on to succeed and have friends on the college teams you play.

And you know because you played in college?

No I LARPED in college. For the ill informed that stands for live action role playing. I got a full ride at D2 Kentucky Wesleyan. A larping powerhouse.

[Anonymous]

Buddy is that you?

[Anonymous]

Hero’s and Coppermine all tied up at 17-17 in Spooky Nook. Headed to OT.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hero’s and Coppermine all tied up at 17-17 in Spooky Nook. Headed to OT.

Spooky Nook means nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hero’s and Coppermine all tied up at 17-17 in Spooky Nook. Headed to OT.

What was the final?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hero’s and Coppermine all tied up at 17-17 in Spooky Nook. Headed to OT.

What was the final?

No one cares.

[Anonymous]

Probably 18-17

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Probably 18-17

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hero’s and Coppermine all tied up at 17-17 in Spooky Nook. Headed to OT.

The lack of follow up suggests a Coppermine win.

[Anonymous]

C-money with the 18-17 win.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hero’s and Coppermine all tied up at 17-17 in Spooky Nook. Headed to OT.

What kind of crazy person is taking the time in the 60 seconds between game’s end and OT to post this update?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hero’s and Coppermine all tied up at 17-17 in Spooky Nook. Headed to OT.

What kind of crazy person is taking the time in the 60 seconds between game’s end and OT to post this update?

Nothing crazy about sharing the results of a top 3 game. You are reading the thread on a Saturday. Maybe a pot and kettle issue.