Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Try as they may, this will solidify DJT as 47.

No. The Republican primary field will act like a political firing squad. Last time Trump danced rings around them, this time, they know what he did and will use it against him mercilessly. No one in the Republican Party wants 4 more years of that, except a handful of MAGA holdouts.

Christie and the other are not going to miss this time!

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! No they won’t. They are terrified of offending Trump supporters. They are all meek, weak, grifters who ate hoping Trump will choke on a hamburger. Even Christie’s pushback is pathetic. He’s just a blustering man who licked Trumps shoes for years and is not trying to seem relevant.

They are all hoping that Jack Smith will take Trump down, and they will be the one standing there to pick up his base. They won’t dare offend him or his supporters.

These people are cowards. They are always hoping someone else will do their dirty work for them. What they don’t get is that there is no Trump base without Trump. These voters aren’t going to show up for someone else

And they've gerrymandered themselves into a corner that overamplifies this sliver of not so stable voters.

I dare not hope for it but I would love it for the GOP if that particular chicken came home to roost.

That chicken is already headed for the roost in some states, and I think it will only get worse.

I really would like to think so and yes I saw the GOP get trounced in 2020 and 2022 but some Republicans would vote for the bones of Adolph Hitler if he had an (R) after his name.

[Anonymous]

Why did Garland pick Jack Smith--who charged and convicted Bob McDonnerll? That conviction was UNANIMOUSLY overturned by the Supreme Court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why did Garland pick Jack Smith--who charged and convicted Bob McDonnerll? That conviction was UNANIMOUSLY overturned by the Supreme Court.

Simple PP, he is a bulldog who doesn't care about the law and only wants to push a narrative. Look at what he did in the Hauge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did Garland pick Jack Smith--who charged and convicted Bob McDonnerll? That conviction was UNANIMOUSLY overturned by the Supreme Court.

Simple PP, he is a bulldog who doesn't care about the law and only wants to push a narrative. Look at what he did in the Hauge.

If you want to talk about who doesn't care about the law, let's talk about the people who repeatedly violated the Hatch Act, the people who received bribes throughout their tenure in the White House, the people who repeatedly ignore subpeonas. I could go on, but let's stop with the BS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why did Garland pick Jack Smith--who charged and convicted Bob McDonnerll? That conviction was UNANIMOUSLY overturned by the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court overturned the McDonnell conviction based on the Judge’s instructions to the jury. Roberts’ decision said it was ok for the McDonnells to take all those bribes because McDonnell didn’t do any “official action” specifically for the bribers. Very much like his position on Clarence Thomas. Some people are above the law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did Garland pick Jack Smith--who charged and convicted Bob McDonnerll? That conviction was UNANIMOUSLY overturned by the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court overturned the McDonnell conviction based on the Judge’s instructions to the jury. Roberts’ decision said it was ok for the McDonnells to take all those bribes because McDonnell didn’t do any “official action” specifically for the bribers. Very much like his position on Clarence Thomas. Some people are above the law.

Those instructions were also in line with decades of settled law on this statute. The SCOTUS decision is overturned that law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did Garland pick Jack Smith--who charged and convicted Bob McDonnerll? That conviction was UNANIMOUSLY overturned by the Supreme Court.

Simple PP, he is a bulldog who doesn't care about the law and only wants to push a narrative. Look at what he did in the Hauge.

Right if his rulings don’t align with your politics, he is terrible. 🙄 But if he were to prosecute a liberal you hate, you would be cheering him on. Not everyone has this warped way of thinking. There are many government officials who aren’t completely brainwashed by politics. You need to step back and realize you are irrational about politics and project your own way of thinking onto all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did Garland pick Jack Smith--who charged and convicted Bob McDonnerll? That conviction was UNANIMOUSLY overturned by the Supreme Court.

Simple PP, he is a bulldog who doesn't care about the law and only wants to push a narrative. Look at what he did in the Hauge.

Right if his rulings don’t align with your politics, he is terrible. 🙄 But if he were to prosecute a liberal you hate, you would be cheering him on. Not everyone has this warped way of thinking. There are many government officials who aren’t completely brainwashed by politics. You need to step back and realize you are irrational about politics and project your own way of thinking onto all.

So your politics are that taking bribes is not an issue. I am getting more clarity on the GOP. Thank you for helping.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Interesting that crickets from the Special Counsel Hurr...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did Garland pick Jack Smith--who charged and convicted Bob McDonnerll? That conviction was UNANIMOUSLY overturned by the Supreme Court.

Simple PP, he is a bulldog who doesn't care about the law and only wants to push a narrative. Look at what he did in the Hauge.

Right if his rulings don’t align with your politics, he is terrible. 🙄 But if he were to prosecute a liberal you hate, you would be cheering him on. Not everyone has this warped way of thinking. There are many government officials who aren’t completely brainwashed by politics. You need to step back and realize you are irrational about politics and project your own way of thinking onto all.

So your politics are that taking bribes is not an issue. I am getting more clarity on the GOP. Thank you for helping.

Taking bribes is a problem. Unsure which qanon theory you’re referring to though. The GOP has too many fantasies going on, which one are you talking about?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Interesting that crickets from the Special Counsel Hurr...

What?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did Garland pick Jack Smith--who charged and convicted Bob McDonnerll? That conviction was UNANIMOUSLY overturned by the Supreme Court.

Simple PP, he is a bulldog who doesn't care about the law and only wants to push a narrative. Look at what he did in the Hauge.

The “Hauge”? Auto correct didn’t catch that for you?

And you think war crimes should just go unprosecuted?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why did Garland pick Jack Smith--who charged and convicted Bob McDonnerll? That conviction was UNANIMOUSLY overturned by the Supreme Court.

I see you are falling for the GOP disinformation campaign