Agree. Online programs don't have this reputation in Europe for example. It's all about how it's structured. Also - My kid is in a fully online aops class right now, and you better believe she's learning much much much more than she does in her MCPS honors geometry class. |
MCPS math curriculum is terrible. It only got better for us when ours took pre-cal and they had textbooks and a more formal teaching style. |
Backed with what data? Oh you have none other than “zoom school didn’t work”. Kids don’t wanna be in person. Definitely not to learn. |
You’re exhausting, i haven’t even read all these threads but I recognize your posts over and over. Don’t you have some virtual students to support? |
That’s where you’re wrong- it would impact other kids because MCPS would have to make cuts elsewhere to fund it. |
Well for one thing the data shows that at the elementary level, math and reading progression was much slower than at the in person level. It is documented in the latest report. We don't know anything about this past year because they won't publish it, probably because there was little to no improvement. |
I’m a teacher who has taken many online classes for certification requirements. It is a terrible way to learn even for adults. Almost all kids would be better off in in-person school |
It’s a great thing you don’t teach virtually. (another teacher here). Why would you come here and say something inflammatory knowing how irresponsible it is to make blanket statements like that? Especially as an educator of children with diverse backgrounds and needs such as we have here in this county. You don’t speak for the millions of adults who have successfully learned virtually. All children are not better off in the building for various reasons. All children are not better in person for various reasons. Do better. |
| I said the same thing twice by accident. It’s not a zero sum game how people learn best. That’s what I meant to say. Anyway, that statement disappointed me. |
First of all, there are a lot of schools that are simply diploma mills and are predominantly online. Capitol College being one example in this area with atrocious quality. Second, even for the schools that have large in-person options, you can very easily tell once you interview them. Or sometimes even by just looking at their resumes. You're far, far less likely to see participation in research activities from online students, for instance. And generally less evidence of work with peers and advisors. You get a completely different level of candidate among the online students. |