Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It sure looks like Meghan and Harry need money. Reliable sources said Harry (had the audacity) to ask Prince Charles for more money when he was home for Prince Philip's funeral -- and that Prince Charles declined additional funds for their "California dream."

So what do we have here....Meghan setting up pap walk to sell photo and merch items for her and Archie. Why else would Meghan's Mirror have the EXACT details for everything she and Archie were wearing up so quickly? She's most likely getting a cut from the merching website.

I know Meghan's fans would never believe she would do this, but this has been her standard operating procedure since her Suits days. Sorry folks.


Interesting details on staged pap walks from this Cosmopolitan article https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/q-and-a/a60015/paparazzo-explains-staged-celebrity-photos/:

"Why would a celebrity ever set up and stage photos?

The biggest reason is money. But they also release photos because they want to have control of their own image.

Many setup photos include a paid product endorsement, where a photo agency works as a middleman between a celebrity and a company who has a product to sell. It could be the latest cell phone that was just released, or a food or beauty product, or something as simple as them being seen shopping at a certain retail outlet. Certain photo agencies specialize in these types of fake paparazzi photos. They usually try to make the photos look natural and candid, but in reality, the celebrity and the photographer are working together. It's a paid photo shoot and the celebrity gets a big check. The readers of tabloid magazines and blogs have no idea!

Control is another big reason for staging photos. There are certain celebs who hate being photographed by paparazzi and they will do anything to avoid it. When your image is such an important part of your career, the last thing they want is to be photographed looking badly. Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds are a good example of a celebrity couple who hates paparazzi, but you will see nice photos of them released on a regular basis. Those photos are totally set up. When they see paparazzi in real life, they put their heads down and hide their faces — unless they are promoting something.

Another example is when there is high demand for a certain photo. When Gwyneth Paltrow and Chris Martin's daughter Apple was first born, they worked directly with an infamous paparazzi photographer in New York. Together, they staged the first baby photos and made them look like candid pictures, then they sold the shots to a major magazine. The pictures were rumored to sell for upward of a million dollars. The paparazzi got a cut, and they took the rest.

Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds are a good example of a celebrity couple who hates paparazzi, but you will see nice photos of them released on a regular basis. Those photos are totally setup.

Kim Kardashian is the biggest example of a celebrity who releases fake paparazzi photos. Kim has a personal paparazzi who she texts regularly. This man flies around the world, going wherever she asks him to be, and they work together to produce the latest fake paparazzi pictures of her. She reviews every image before they start selling them to magazines. If they shoot on a beach, these images are heavily Photoshopped and she chooses her favorites to sell."

“Reliable sources”? Is that like: “People are saying....”?

DP. Wait - do you actually not understand that celebrities sell access and photos? I thought even the most naive folks had figured this stuff out by now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So is Oprah distancing herself from their interview? Worried about fallout? She says "she didn't expect Meghan and Harry to go there" regarding racist accusations toward BRF.

I'm not sure I understand what Oprah is doing. Is she worried about being shut out of future BRF access? I would think she would know that she'll probably never get access to anyone but Meghan and Harry in the future.

I’m sure she knows only Meghan and Harry will talk to her now - not the BRF. Imo she’s just being honest: Oprah probably was surprised they decided to accuse their close family of racism on international TV - without offering a shred of evidence. Most people wouldn’t drop that sort of atomic bomb on their family unless they hated their family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So is Oprah distancing herself from their interview? Worried about fallout? She says "she didn't expect Meghan and Harry to go there" regarding racist accusations toward BRF.

I'm not sure I understand what Oprah is doing. Is she worried about being shut out of future BRF access? I would think she would know that she'll probably never get access to anyone but Meghan and Harry in the future.

I’m sure she knows only Meghan and Harry will talk to her now - not the BRF. Imo she’s just being honest: Oprah probably was surprised they decided to accuse their close family of racism on international TV - without offering a shred of evidence. Most people wouldn’t drop that sort of atomic bomb on their family unless they hated their family.

...Or unless their family failed to protect them from hatred. This would be particularly true if the hatred included sources within the family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So is Oprah distancing herself from their interview? Worried about fallout? She says "she didn't expect Meghan and Harry to go there" regarding racist accusations toward BRF.

I'm not sure I understand what Oprah is doing. Is she worried about being shut out of future BRF access? I would think she would know that she'll probably never get access to anyone but Meghan and Harry in the future.

I’m sure she knows only Meghan and Harry will talk to her now - not the BRF. Imo she’s just being honest: Oprah probably was surprised they decided to accuse their close family of racism on international TV - without offering a shred of evidence. Most people wouldn’t drop that sort of atomic bomb on their family unless they hated their family.

...Or unless their family failed to protect them from hatred. This would be particularly true if the hatred included sources within the family.

So you think Oprah is a dummy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So is Oprah distancing herself from their interview? Worried about fallout? She says "she didn't expect Meghan and Harry to go there" regarding racist accusations toward BRF.

I'm not sure I understand what Oprah is doing. Is she worried about being shut out of future BRF access? I would think she would know that she'll probably never get access to anyone but Meghan and Harry in the future.

I’m sure she knows only Meghan and Harry will talk to her now - not the BRF. Imo she’s just being honest: Oprah probably was surprised they decided to accuse their close family of racism on international TV - without offering a shred of evidence. Most people wouldn’t drop that sort of atomic bomb on their family unless they hated their family.

...Or unless their family failed to protect them from hatred. This would be particularly true if the hatred included sources within the family.

Why would any grown adult ever expect protection from others? With all the privileges that Harry and Meghan have enjoyed, it would feel so sad if they still feel entitled to more as if they are children. They’re big kids now with more privilege than anyone who has ever posted on DCUM. If they are still feeling like persecuted victims, there is something wrong with them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It sure looks like Meghan and Harry need money. Reliable sources said Harry (had the audacity) to ask Prince Charles for more money when he was home for Prince Philip's funeral -- and that Prince Charles declined additional funds for their "California dream."

So what do we have here....Meghan setting up pap walk to sell photo and merch items for her and Archie. Why else would Meghan's Mirror have the EXACT details for everything she and Archie were wearing up so quickly? She's most likely getting a cut from the merching website.

I know Meghan's fans would never believe she would do this, but this has been her standard operating procedure since her Suits days. Sorry folks.


Interesting details on staged pap walks from this Cosmopolitan article https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/q-and-a/a60015/paparazzo-explains-staged-celebrity-photos/:

"Why would a celebrity ever set up and stage photos?

The biggest reason is money. But they also release photos because they want to have control of their own image.

Many setup photos include a paid product endorsement, where a photo agency works as a middleman between a celebrity and a company who has a product to sell. It could be the latest cell phone that was just released, or a food or beauty product, or something as simple as them being seen shopping at a certain retail outlet. Certain photo agencies specialize in these types of fake paparazzi photos. They usually try to make the photos look natural and candid, but in reality, the celebrity and the photographer are working together. It's a paid photo shoot and the celebrity gets a big check. The readers of tabloid magazines and blogs have no idea!

Control is another big reason for staging photos. There are certain celebs who hate being photographed by paparazzi and they will do anything to avoid it. When your image is such an important part of your career, the last thing they want is to be photographed looking badly. Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds are a good example of a celebrity couple who hates paparazzi, but you will see nice photos of them released on a regular basis. Those photos are totally set up. When they see paparazzi in real life, they put their heads down and hide their faces — unless they are promoting something.

Another example is when there is high demand for a certain photo. When Gwyneth Paltrow and Chris Martin's daughter Apple was first born, they worked directly with an infamous paparazzi photographer in New York. Together, they staged the first baby photos and made them look like candid pictures, then they sold the shots to a major magazine. The pictures were rumored to sell for upward of a million dollars. The paparazzi got a cut, and they took the rest.

Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds are a good example of a celebrity couple who hates paparazzi, but you will see nice photos of them released on a regular basis. Those photos are totally setup.

Kim Kardashian is the biggest example of a celebrity who releases fake paparazzi photos. Kim has a personal paparazzi who she texts regularly. This man flies around the world, going wherever she asks him to be, and they work together to produce the latest fake paparazzi pictures of her. She reviews every image before they start selling them to magazines. If they shoot on a beach, these images are heavily Photoshopped and she chooses her favorites to sell."

I’m finding it hard to believe that Harry would hit up his somewhat estranged dad for money at their first in-person meeting in over a year. What happened to the 9-figure Netflix deal?

[Anonymous]

Why do you find it hard to believe? Harry was whining to Oprah that his dad cut him off less than a year ago. He wants his family to give him financial resources for sure. That’s not even debatable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It sure looks like Meghan and Harry need money. Reliable sources said Harry (had the audacity) to ask Prince Charles for more money when he was home for Prince Philip's funeral -- and that Prince Charles declined additional funds for their "California dream."

So what do we have here....Meghan setting up pap walk to sell photo and merch items for her and Archie. Why else would Meghan's Mirror have the EXACT details for everything she and Archie were wearing up so quickly? She's most likely getting a cut from the merching website.

I know Meghan's fans would never believe she would do this, but this has been her standard operating procedure since her Suits days. Sorry folks.


Interesting details on staged pap walks from this Cosmopolitan article https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/q-and-a/a60015/paparazzo-explains-staged-celebrity-photos/:

"Why would a celebrity ever set up and stage photos?

The biggest reason is money. But they also release photos because they want to have control of their own image.

Many setup photos include a paid product endorsement, where a photo agency works as a middleman between a celebrity and a company who has a product to sell. It could be the latest cell phone that was just released, or a food or beauty product, or something as simple as them being seen shopping at a certain retail outlet. Certain photo agencies specialize in these types of fake paparazzi photos. They usually try to make the photos look natural and candid, but in reality, the celebrity and the photographer are working together. It's a paid photo shoot and the celebrity gets a big check. The readers of tabloid magazines and blogs have no idea!

Control is another big reason for staging photos. There are certain celebs who hate being photographed by paparazzi and they will do anything to avoid it. When your image is such an important part of your career, the last thing they want is to be photographed looking badly. Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds are a good example of a celebrity couple who hates paparazzi, but you will see nice photos of them released on a regular basis. Those photos are totally set up. When they see paparazzi in real life, they put their heads down and hide their faces — unless they are promoting something.

Another example is when there is high demand for a certain photo. When Gwyneth Paltrow and Chris Martin's daughter Apple was first born, they worked directly with an infamous paparazzi photographer in New York. Together, they staged the first baby photos and made them look like candid pictures, then they sold the shots to a major magazine. The pictures were rumored to sell for upward of a million dollars. The paparazzi got a cut, and they took the rest.

Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds are a good example of a celebrity couple who hates paparazzi, but you will see nice photos of them released on a regular basis. Those photos are totally setup.

Kim Kardashian is the biggest example of a celebrity who releases fake paparazzi photos. Kim has a personal paparazzi who she texts regularly. This man flies around the world, going wherever she asks him to be, and they work together to produce the latest fake paparazzi pictures of her. She reviews every image before they start selling them to magazines. If they shoot on a beach, these images are heavily Photoshopped and she chooses her favorites to sell."

“Reliable sources”? Is that like: “People are saying....”?

DP. Wait - do you actually not understand that celebrities sell access and photos? I thought even the most naive folks had figured this stuff out by now.

Of course celebrities sell access and photos. Celebrities who can command a global audience like Harry and Meghan did with the Oprah interview are not selling pap walks—that’s laughable! It’s also crazy that you think Meghan is running a cheap fan site like Meghan’s Mirror. Hint the Instagram fan accounts also aren’t hers... They’re about to have a baby, there’s a good chance they’re going to sell the first photo like many celebrities — and I bet the amount of the final bid will enrage you.

You’re so determined to hate her, logic flew right out the window.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why do you find it hard to believe? Harry was whining to Oprah that his dad cut him off less than a year ago. He wants his family to give him financial resources for sure. That’s not even debatable.

But they’ve cut extremely lucrative deals since then. Why would he still need to mooch off Pop?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do you find it hard to believe? Harry was whining to Oprah that his dad cut him off less than a year ago. He wants his family to give him financial resources for sure. That’s not even debatable.

But they’ve cut extremely lucrative deals since then. Why would he still need to mooch off Pop?

I agree. When you’re an adult and enjoy so much wealth and privilege, why would you still whine about pops not giving you money?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do you find it hard to believe? Harry was whining to Oprah that his dad cut him off less than a year ago. He wants his family to give him financial resources for sure. That’s not even debatable.

But they’ve cut extremely lucrative deals since then. Why would he still need to mooch off Pop?

Because PP can’t accept that they’re doing fine. All this about their finances is old news. There’s a poster that keeps insisting that because a fan site figured out that Meghan was wearing jeans, that means she was working with paparazzi to sell a few thousand dollars in merchandise. Meghan is the only celebrity on the planet who has full control over every fan site created about her. Who knew?

Some people can’t accept that since quitting royal life, H&M have negotiated a 75 million deal with Spotify and 200 million with Netflix. THAT is how they’re supporting themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do you find it hard to believe? Harry was whining to Oprah that his dad cut him off less than a year ago. He wants his family to give him financial resources for sure. That’s not even debatable.

But they’ve cut extremely lucrative deals since then. Why would he still need to mooch off Pop?

Because PP can’t accept that they’re doing fine. All this about their finances is old news. There’s a poster that keeps insisting that because a fan site figured out that Meghan was wearing jeans, that means she was working with paparazzi to sell a few thousand dollars in merchandise. Meghan is the only celebrity on the planet who has full control over every fan site created about her. Who knew?

Some people can’t accept that since quitting royal life, H&M have negotiated a 75 million deal with Spotify and 200 million with Netflix. THAT is how they’re supporting themselves.

lol. Are the poster who keeps trying to tell us how beautiful light-skinned women have it the worst when it comes to racism?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do you find it hard to believe? Harry was whining to Oprah that his dad cut him off less than a year ago. He wants his family to give him financial resources for sure. That’s not even debatable.

But they’ve cut extremely lucrative deals since then. Why would he still need to mooch off Pop?

Because PP can’t accept that they’re doing fine. All this about their finances is old news. There’s a poster that keeps insisting that because a fan site figured out that Meghan was wearing jeans, that means she was working with paparazzi to sell a few thousand dollars in merchandise. Meghan is the only celebrity on the planet who has full control over every fan site created about her. Who knew?

Some people can’t accept that since quitting royal life, H&M have negotiated a 75 million deal with Spotify and 200 million with Netflix. THAT is how they’re supporting themselves.

The question was never if the prince and his princess were fine.

If you thought that was ever the question, you were wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do you find it hard to believe? Harry was whining to Oprah that his dad cut him off less than a year ago. He wants his family to give him financial resources for sure. That’s not even debatable.

But they’ve cut extremely lucrative deals since then. Why would he still need to mooch off Pop?

Because PP can’t accept that they’re doing fine. All this about their finances is old news. There’s a poster that keeps insisting that because a fan site figured out that Meghan was wearing jeans, that means she was working with paparazzi to sell a few thousand dollars in merchandise. Meghan is the only celebrity on the planet who has full control over every fan site created about her. Who knew?

Some people can’t accept that since quitting royal life, H&M have negotiated a 75 million deal with Spotify and 200 million with Netflix. THAT is how they’re supporting themselves.

So, you think Netflix wrote them a check for $200m? That’s not how this works. And I don’t think the amount has been confirmed, anyway.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do you find it hard to believe? Harry was whining to Oprah that his dad cut him off less than a year ago. He wants his family to give him financial resources for sure. That’s not even debatable.

But they’ve cut extremely lucrative deals since then. Why would he still need to mooch off Pop?

Because PP can’t accept that they’re doing fine. All this about their finances is old news. There’s a poster that keeps insisting that because a fan site figured out that Meghan was wearing jeans, that means she was working with paparazzi to sell a few thousand dollars in merchandise. Meghan is the only celebrity on the planet who has full control over every fan site created about her. Who knew?

Some people can’t accept that since quitting royal life, H&M have negotiated a 75 million deal with Spotify and 200 million with Netflix. THAT is how they’re supporting themselves.

If Harry recognized his privilege, he’d stop whining about his oppression.

So, you think Netflix wrote them a check for $200m? That’s not how this works. And I don’t think the amount has been confirmed, anyway.