Forum Index
»
Soccer
They obviously can't compete on the MLSNext level. That's been shown the past 2 - 3 years, all across their age groups. Figure out why that's bad. And no one wants anything bad for the kids or their parents, the coach is just a huge dbag. |
| I pray they don't lose their MLS Next badge. It's an easy 3pts for all of us. |
We want better for our kids. And we want change. Had we known, we wouldn't have joined Achilles. And this same toxic coach is the head coach at St. John's College High School. So alot of kids have been and continue to be burned -- some twice over simultaneously in high school and travel. Be glad you don't have a son in this situation. It is really bad. |
So we shouldn't believe our ears and eyes watching the video? That aside, yes, some may go too far on DCUM but it doesn't change the facts. |
|
If Achilles got sold today, it would be a high performing team by March
The owner/coaches are the problem. |
I'm the PP. I think this it is totally fair for a parent of a child at Achilles, having a rough go of it, or otherwise, to come here and point out problems. I feel for you. I was referring to the people who don't seem to have skin in the game and just want to tear it down, for whatever reason. And I don't at all believe it's for the sake of your child or other people's children or some general concern for the state of soccer. |
That is correct -- they can't compete at the MLS Next level. But know that virtually all of the players across all four Achilles MLS Next teams are playing up a year. Achilles does this to stay in business -- they don't have enough kids to form a team for a specific year and/or MLS Next prevents them from rostering a team for certain years. For example, Achilles cannot field a U17 team this year, so most of the kids on the U19 team (who would be on a U17 team) are only 16 years old. I think it would be a struggle for them to compete at the U17 level, but U19 is crazy. So that is another reason why the losses are so dramatic -- as in the results against Philadelphia Union this past Saturday. MLS Next should not allow this -- they know the rosters and can easily see what Achilles is doing. It just sets up the kids for failure. |
I don't know why this would be the case for the U16s this year. I understand that last year's U16 squad was comprised mostly of 2009s playing up. But I would have thought that those kids would still be there and playing on age for U16 this year. I also heard that they had added some quality players and had some returning players for that age group. Why would they have to resort to playing 2010s into the U16 group? |
Regardless of the reason, they aren't competitive in MLS Next and haven't been for the past few years. |
39:2 combined scoreline shows a complete lack of preparation and understanding of how to properly develop and compete at this level. Getting crushed like that doesn’t build confidence or skills. |
LOL, BSC parents talking trash like they aren’t part of the same type of lousy organization. |
You’re delusional if you think any of these places can actually develop kids into pros. |
Three kids went from my son’s 2009 PPA team a few years ago to DC United. But no one would be crazy enough to argue that PPA deserves MLS Next. And neither does Achilles. |
| Do people actually like Achilles? How about their B teams? Is it good for a younger kid who wants to go to St John's to join next year? Our son is 10 and we are looking for a team for him. |
yes some do. I think the older kids can make a decision on whether or not to go. I would not go to a club team because your kid wants to play high school soccer. If you are good, he won't care where you play. |