It appears Bolton's book undercuts Trump's defense

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is a hoot!

Yesterday, Bolton's book was "fake".

Today Bolton's book is "classified".

Call me crazy (or stupid), but how can complete fiction be classified?

good question

I got it!

It's Schrödinger's Book.

A book that is at the same time fake and classified, but the minute you open it to read it is fake

HA!

[Anonymous]

Apparently the GOP is now confident they have the votes to block witnesses.

So they very well might vote to block witnesses on Friday afternoon and immediately vote on the 2 impeachment charges on Friday night, almost certainly acquitting the President without ever hearing from a witness or receiving documents.

Wow.

[Anonymous]

The GOP are a bunch of spineless cowards.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

...Is Bolton the whistleblower?

Oh boy that would be something.

But I think the whistleblower spoke up weeks before September.

For context, I believe the impeachment inquiry was opened a day after this Engel-Bolton phone call.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The GOP are a bunch of spineless cowards.

Please don't insult spineless cowards. Spineless cowards often have character.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Apparently the GOP is now confident they have the votes to block witnesses.

So they very well might vote to block witnesses on Friday afternoon and immediately vote on the 2 impeachment charges on Friday night, almost certainly acquitting the President without ever hearing from a witness or receiving documents.

Wow.

Citizens should rise up and protest. Shut D.C. down

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently the GOP is now confident they have the votes to block witnesses.

So they very well might vote to block witnesses on Friday afternoon and immediately vote on the 2 impeachment charges on Friday night, almost certainly acquitting the President without ever hearing from a witness or receiving documents.

Wow.

Citizens should rise up and protest. Shut D.C. down

PP here. I'm actually planning on taking the day off on Monday and going into DC if they vote to acquit him. I'll join whatever protest is happening.

[Anonymous]

Bolton is the whistleblower?!?!?!

WELL HOT DAMN. Looks like those turds at Fox should get their wish afterall.
WE MUST HEAR FROM THE WHISTLEBLOWER!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bolton is the whistleblower?!?!?!

WELL HOT DAMN. Looks like those turds at Fox should get their wish afterall.
WE MUST HEAR FROM THE WHISTLEBLOWER!

THAT would be incredible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bolton is the whistleblower?!?!?!

WELL HOT DAMN. Looks like those turds at Fox should get their wish afterall.
WE MUST HEAR FROM THE WHISTLEBLOWER!

Unclear, but looking more like that, to me. Consider this timing, Fiona Hill's testimony, how he kept telling people to talk to lawyers, and nobody did. It is starting to fit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Apparently the GOP is now confident they have the votes to block witnesses.

So they very well might vote to block witnesses on Friday afternoon and immediately vote on the 2 impeachment charges on Friday night, almost certainly acquitting the President without ever hearing from a witness or receiving documents.

Wow.

GOP offered to get the manuscript. Schumer said no. Why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently the GOP is now confident they have the votes to block witnesses.

So they very well might vote to block witnesses on Friday afternoon and immediately vote on the 2 impeachment charges on Friday night, almost certainly acquitting the President without ever hearing from a witness or receiving documents.

Wow.

GOP offered to get the manuscript. Schumer said no. Why?

Because they want Bolton.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently the GOP is now confident they have the votes to block witnesses.

So they very well might vote to block witnesses on Friday afternoon and immediately vote on the 2 impeachment charges on Friday night, almost certainly acquitting the President without ever hearing from a witness or receiving documents.

Wow.

GOP offered to get the manuscript. Schumer said no. Why?

Because, according to the White House, the manuscript is "fake." But it should also be considered "classified"- rather than get into more BS, just call the witness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently the GOP is now confident they have the votes to block witnesses.

So they very well might vote to block witnesses on Friday afternoon and immediately vote on the 2 impeachment charges on Friday night, almost certainly acquitting the President without ever hearing from a witness or receiving documents.

Wow.

GOP offered to get the manuscript. Schumer said no. Why?

Because you can't ask questions of documents. Because the GOP can turn around and say that the manuscript is full of lies or that the Democrats are "misinterpreting" the words in the text. A lot harder to do that with a real person testifying.

It begs the question of why, if the GOP supports getting the manuscript, they don't support subpoenaing Bolton? Or at least requesting that he testify?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently the GOP is now confident they have the votes to block witnesses.

So they very well might vote to block witnesses on Friday afternoon and immediately vote on the 2 impeachment charges on Friday night, almost certainly acquitting the President without ever hearing from a witness or receiving documents.

Wow.

GOP offered to get the manuscript. Schumer said no. Why?

What manuscript? Another “manuscript” edited by the chumps and dirtbags in the Trump admin? No thanks.