Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Thank you. Our son is a rising freshman and GZ is one of 3 schools to which he applied. Not presuming he's accepted, but truly to help us in our decision matrix, are you able to share which sport/team was represented in the group of vandals? Is there someplace we can find out the "cultures" of the different sports teams? Please don't beat me up over this question. Thanks.
Knowing which "sport/team was represented in the group of vandals" should have no bearing on whether or not you decide to send your son to Gonzaga.
Why do you say that? If my kid were very focused on his sport and planned to play it in HS, and I found out that a majority of the kids actively involved in the vandalism played that same sport, it would definitely make me think twice about sending him. As the PP noted, different schools and teams can have different cultures, and that's something it makes perfect sense to investigate if sports are your kid's primary extracurricular.
Just to be clear, you'd be okay sending your son to a school that has teams with bad cultures, so long as those teams aren't the ones your son plans on being apart of?
DP but yes of course that would be OK. For example, if I knew the rugby team had a drinking culture but my son played only soccer and that team's culture was good, then the Rugby team culture would not dissuade me from sending my son (assuming the school was otherwise the best choice).
For clarity - it wasn't rugby - it was entitled lacrosse players and they are banned from the team this spring... so not expelled - leadership is lacking
Emphasis on "assuming the school was otherwise the best choice." Fair point. I guess my point is, if the administration allowed the rugby team (in your example) to develop a culture so bad it would cause prospective parents to second guess an acceptance, is that even the type of school you'd want to be affiliated with in the first place?