GreatSchools makes segregation easy!

[Anonymous]

Blair, a DCC school, has the highest rate of admission to tier 1 schools; whereas, last I checked Wotton was a 4 on GS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Blair, a DCC school, has the highest rate of admission to tier 1 schools; whereas, last I checked Wotton was a 4 on GS.

When was the last time you checked?
https://www.greatschools.org/maryland/rockville/966-Thomas-S.-Wootton-High-School/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Blair, a DCC school, has the highest rate of admission to tier 1 schools; whereas, last I checked Wotton was a 4 on GS.

Huh? I dont recall Wootton ever being a 4. Are you talking about Whitman which has a GS rating of 4 based on test scores?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blair, a DCC school, has the highest rate of admission to tier 1 schools; whereas, last I checked Wotton was a 4 on GS.

Huh? I dont recall Wootton ever being a 4. Are you talking about Whitman which has a GS rating of 4 based on test scores?

Actually it's back up to 8, but it was fine while it lasted.

[Anonymous]

^^^fun! It was fun while it lasted!

[Anonymous]

Wootton is a 9 and was a 10 before the ratings changed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:White privilege is simply a higher average IQ and intact family structure. Honestly it should be renamed Asian privilege because Asians in the US do slightly better than whites on almost every objective measure. Oh, and in general they have slightly higher IQs and fewer out of wedlock births. Strange how that works.

How do you even answer to such blatantly racist post?

Well, you could try to refute anything said in the post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
A perfectly diverse school would be 0% white (like Kennedy is heading towards). This would be utopia.

Kennedy and Wootton are currently basically equally diverse. Or, rather, non-diverse. Because segregation.

In fact, most American schools are becoming increasingly segregated. So, for every Whitman, there's a Kennedy. This is bad for both the Whitman kids and the Kennedy kids, and they are two sides of the same problem.

No, actually you are wrong. The "W Schools" are all becoming more racially diverse while the DCC schools and other previously diverse schools (like Springbrook, Paint Branch, Watkins Mill, etc.) are becoming less racially diverse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
A perfectly diverse school would be 0% white (like Kennedy is heading towards). This would be utopia.

Kennedy and Wootton are currently basically equally diverse. Or, rather, non-diverse. Because segregation.

In fact, most American schools are becoming increasingly segregated. So, for every Whitman, there's a Kennedy. This is bad for both the Whitman kids and the Kennedy kids, and they are two sides of the same problem.

No, actually you are wrong. The "W Schools" are all becoming more racially diverse while the DCC schools and other previously diverse schools (like Springbrook, Paint Branch, Watkins Mill, etc.) are becoming less racially diverse.

This is true. You want to see a real W (white) school, check out a Whitman yearbook from 1988.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
A perfectly diverse school would be 0% white (like Kennedy is heading towards). This would be utopia.

Kennedy and Wootton are currently basically equally diverse. Or, rather, non-diverse. Because segregation.

In fact, most American schools are becoming increasingly segregated. So, for every Whitman, there's a Kennedy. This is bad for both the Whitman kids and the Kennedy kids, and they are two sides of the same problem.

No, actually you are wrong. The "W Schools" are all becoming more racially diverse while the DCC schools and other previously diverse schools (like Springbrook, Paint Branch, Watkins Mill, etc.) are becoming less racially diverse.

Just because Whitman has a few African diplomats kids, doesn't make it diverse.
Wootton is bi-racial (whites and Asian ).
But thanks for the laugh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
A perfectly diverse school would be 0% white (like Kennedy is heading towards). This would be utopia.

Kennedy and Wootton are currently basically equally diverse. Or, rather, non-diverse. Because segregation.

In fact, most American schools are becoming increasingly segregated. So, for every Whitman, there's a Kennedy. This is bad for both the Whitman kids and the Kennedy kids, and they are two sides of the same problem.

No, actually you are wrong. The "W Schools" are all becoming more racially diverse while the DCC schools and other previously diverse schools (like Springbrook, Paint Branch, Watkins Mill, etc.) are becoming less racially diverse.

As measured how, compared to when?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
A perfectly diverse school would be 0% white (like Kennedy is heading towards). This would be utopia.

Kennedy and Wootton are currently basically equally diverse. Or, rather, non-diverse. Because segregation.

In fact, most American schools are becoming increasingly segregated. So, for every Whitman, there's a Kennedy. This is bad for both the Whitman kids and the Kennedy kids, and they are two sides of the same problem.

No, actually you are wrong. The "W Schools" are all becoming more racially diverse while the DCC schools and other previously diverse schools (like Springbrook, Paint Branch, Watkins Mill, etc.) are becoming less racially diverse.

Just because Whitman has a few African diplomats kids, doesn't make it diverse.
Wootton is bi-racial (whites and Asian ).
But thanks for the laugh.

My Churchill feeder school (Cabin John MS) is majority non-white ( http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/regulatoryaccountability/glance/currentyear/schools/03606.pdf )

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
My Churchill feeder school (Cabin John MS) is majority non-white ( http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/regulatoryaccountability/glance/currentyear/schools/03606.pdf )

I think that the demographics in MCPS, and Montgomery County as a whole, are more complex than "white" and "non-white".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
My Churchill feeder school (Cabin John MS) is majority non-white ( http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/regulatoryaccountability/glance/currentyear/schools/03606.pdf )

I think that the demographics in MCPS, and Montgomery County as a whole, are more complex than "white" and "non-white".

It seams the only diversity credits the eastern half of the county likes to hand out are for poor blacks and immigrants in ESOL. I mean I get it because that is what fills most of their schools but there are better mixtures of diversity. They are welcome to continue to hero pat themselves on their backs if they like, doesn’t change much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
My Churchill feeder school (Cabin John MS) is majority non-white ( http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/regulatoryaccountability/glance/currentyear/schools/03606.pdf )

I think that the demographics in MCPS, and Montgomery County as a whole, are more complex than "white" and "non-white".

It seams the only diversity credits the eastern half of the county likes to hand out are for poor blacks and immigrants in ESOL. I mean I get it because that is what fills most of their schools but there are better mixtures of diversity. They are welcome to continue to hero pat themselves on their backs if they like, doesn’t change much.

"Diversity" doesn't mean what you seem to think it means.