|
On the second day of a war that no one in the US government has elaborated a clear justification for, we the American taxpayer killed 150+ kids.
Incredible what damage an incompetent and value-free administration can do. |
|
When has Trump ever taken responsibility for anything? It was obvious to a duck that the Iranians didn't have the Tomahawk missiles that struck the school. Only the Americans did And the outpouring of grief of thousands of people attending funerals and Iranians digging mass graves for the dead little girls. That's a pretty elaborate false flag even for the conspiracy nuts. Republicans don't hold him accountable for his lies, and he's destroyed the reputation of America as a reliable and thoughtful superpower globally. |
| They deliberately put schools next to military its terrorist 101 |
Iran uses them as human shield for military , the guard |
You call out 170 kids killed in a school, yes - an atrocity You call out 100,000 killed in Gaza, yes - an atrocity But call out 20-30,000 killed by Iran just a little over a month ago? - merely "not a good place" and "no real threat" and "whataboutism" - so dismissive. And to try and claim the protests were a "CIA/Mossad psyop" is ludicrous considering there were millions protesting in 190+ cities across Iran. But sure, it's all just a few dozen CIA and Mossad guys disguised as Persians running around like Speedy Gonzales waving lion flags making it look like they are millions. Sorry, but that's just pure delusion. There's a genuine groundswell. The protests have been organic, and bottom-up. Anyone claiming otherwise is ignoring mountains of evidence. Sorry but Iran absolutely is a threat. They have called us "Satan" and have vowed to destroy us since 1979. They have conducted in countless assassinations, bombings, terror attacks and so on, whether directly or through proxies - it's not just about ballistic missiles. You claim "existential threat" and cite some Trumpy blathering bluster about "stone age" - which nobody actually takes seriously. He's stated his aim is regime change. Someone other than an extremist Ayatollah. And that's what millions of Iranian people want, too. They, by the way, also had no say in selecting Mojtaba Khameini as Supreme Leader. And Pezeshkian was only "elected" out of a pre-approved group of candidates hand-picked by the ruling elite. The true reformers who people would prefer in Iran's leadership are either dead, in jail, or exiled. The people of Iran had no genuinely free choice in who to elect. Also, as people have repeatedly told you, waving off criticism by claiming everyone's a "Zionist" isn't working. It's foolish and massively misses the mark. I for one am not a Jew, am not even a Christian, and have zero allegiance to Israel, and I'd be the first to agree that Netanyahu, Yoav Gallant, Halevi, Ben Gvir, Smotrich, Netanyahu's War Cabinet, Shin Bet and other heads should be prosecuted over Gaza. In that light, you should feel really foolish for constantly accusing me and others of being a "Zionist." That's the kind of thing that constantly undermines your credibility and calls your arguments into question rather than giving you whatever you think it does, whether moral footing or a sound basis for trying to shut others down. It doesn't work because it's false. |
So there is this thing that the Israelis started to do years ago. If you claim there is a high priority target in the area you can avoid war crime charges. It has been very successful for the Israelis. You blow up a hospital…well senior leadership was using the hospital as a hidden bunker. No proof is needed. You just need to claim it. There are a few independent journalists in Israel who have constructed the history of this. Very surprised the US military owned up to this. A lot of careers died with the release of this report. |
Correct- War crime under Fourth Geneva Convention (1949) Art. 28: Using protected persons to shield military targets War crime under Geneva Convention Additional Protocol I (1977) Art. 51(7): Using civilians to shield military objectives War crime under Geneva Convention Additional Protocol I (1977) Art. 58: Duty to remove civilians from military areas War crime under Rome Statute (ICC) Art. 8(2)(b)(xxiii): Human shielding as a war crime |
No Israel does that. The Iranians have more humanity. |
Are you high or just stupid? I attended an American public school next to a defense plant. US embassies have American schools co-located with military bases. None of that excuses dropping bombs on a school shows playing fields with walls that are painted blue and pink. If this had happened to American children, Americans would be rioting in the streets. |
|
War games managed from thousands of miles away with deadly consequences for little kids. |
Nearly all of the 161 US DoDEA schools are located directly on military installations. Is the US government using students in DOD schools as human shields? |
Who could they have blamed for the error? None of the warring parties used Tomahawks except for the Americans. It was a pink and blue colored school with asphalt playing fields and the New York Times shows photos that it had been a school since 2016 at least. |
See, this is why no one takes you seriously. GTFO with your propaganda and lies. DP |
All your argument is full of it. First talk about North Korea. They've actually killed Americans. Many of them. They have the capacity to take down the world economy. They have killed countless citizens and put millions more in concentration camps. Have your family enlist in that war or stfu. Iran is literally not a threat to us and, similar to what OBL said in his letter to America, only cares about America because America protects Israel, and Israel kills muslims. So, by all accounts, you are a zionist. You just don't understand why. We need to divest from the Middle East. We're energy self-sufficient. Plus we will also have solar and wind energy. And Trump is investing in nuclear energy. The polar ice cap is melting and we can use that route instead of any canals to transport goods. Europe is pretty much worthless since it cut down all its trees and has no other real natural resource. Asia will be important for the next 100 years and we may have already lost that. |