Greendland - why not?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Considering that Trump is sick, fat, and very old, why does he care whether we get Greenland. Is it all about legacy or is someone more powerful, who he’s very afraid of, his puppet strings?

Expansionism. Ever since the USA was founded, leaders have tried to expand the territories. The world order changed post-WWII but the alpha male instinct to take more has never gone away.

I wonder who will run the operations. They’ve already gotten rid of competent leaders in the maga DEI program, and more current senior military leadership is saying that the attack would be illegal. Once we really get to the third string teams I think that we will have lost any advantages that we had, militarily, or at least a lot of it. We really only have to take one look at the economy to see how well it works out when you put loyalists in charge instead of competent people.

Plus, you have a million civilians that work for DoD. How many support Trump and his dementia wars?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So republicans are going to attack Greenland in winter. They will bomb and destroy infrastructure forcing the 600k residents of Greenland out on to the ice. For what?

The total population of Greenland is approximately 57,000. Over 26% (15,000) of Greenland's residents are above age 55.

Greenland needs to hold a special election ASAP to determine whether the new national language should be Mandarin or English. It's that simple.

Denmark cannot defend Greenland. Denmark's entire military has fewer members than the NYC police force.

Denmark has no legal or historical right to claim Greenland.

Greenlanders do not want to be Danish citizens. Greenlanders want to be Greenlanders, but this is unrealistic as both China & Russia want to occupy Greenland.

The USA can best defend and develop Greenland for the mutual benefit of Greenlanders, Americans, NATO members, and the Danish.

Greenland must become part of America in our rapidly developing and changing world or China will dominate.

Historically, the US has tried to purchase Greenland more than once.

So, Greenland--what do you prefer--to learn to speak Mandarin or to learn English ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So republicans are going to attack Greenland in winter. They will bomb and destroy infrastructure forcing the 600k residents of Greenland out on to the ice. For what?

The total population of Greenland is approximately 57,000. Over 26% (15,000) of Greenland's residents are above age 55.

Greenland needs to hold a special election ASAP to determine whether the new national language should be Mandarin or English. It's that simple.

Denmark cannot defend Greenland. Denmark's entire military has fewer members than the NYC police force.

Denmark has no legal or historical right to claim Greenland.

Greenlanders do not want to be Danish citizens. Greenlanders want to be Greenlanders, but this is unrealistic as both China & Russia want to occupy Greenland.

The USA can best defend and develop Greenland for the mutual benefit of Greenlanders, Americans, NATO members, and the Danish.

Greenland must become part of America in our rapidly developing and changing world or China will dominate.

Historically, the US has tried to purchase Greenland more than once.

So, Greenland--what do you prefer--to learn to speak Mandarin or to learn English ?

NATO can defend Greenland. So yeah, anyway...next.

[Anonymous]

The United States of America will not use military force against Greenland or against Denmark.

The USA will purchase Greenland from both Denmark & from the 57,000 citizens of Greenland.

If a purchase is refused, The USA will occupy Greenland, develop Greenland, and enrich not only America, but also Greenlanders and the country of Denmark.

Our current President sees the future in a clear and realistic manner.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So republicans are going to attack Greenland in winter. They will bomb and destroy infrastructure forcing the 600k residents of Greenland out on to the ice. For what?

The total population of Greenland is approximately 57,000. Over 26% (15,000) of Greenland's residents are above age 55.

Greenland needs to hold a special election ASAP to determine whether the new national language should be Mandarin or English. It's that simple.

Denmark cannot defend Greenland. Denmark's entire military has fewer members than the NYC police force.

Denmark has no legal or historical right to claim Greenland.

Greenlanders do not want to be Danish citizens. Greenlanders want to be Greenlanders, but this is unrealistic as both China & Russia want to occupy Greenland.

The USA can best defend and develop Greenland for the mutual benefit of Greenlanders, Americans, NATO members, and the Danish.

Greenland must become part of America in our rapidly developing and changing world or China will dominate.

Historically, the US has tried to purchase Greenland more than once.

So, Greenland--what do you prefer--to learn to speak Mandarin or to learn English ?

Stupid.

Denmark is part of NATO. NATO without the US can easily defeat Russia. It would be over in days. Moreover, the US would not sit idly by if Russia were to take the upper hand. Not because of any Trumpian loyalty (there is no such thing as Trumpian loyalty), but because having Russia there would terrify MAGA.

Same with China. Even if NATO without the US couldn't defeat China (though they probably could in Greenland owing to logistics, etc.), the US again would not sit idly by and allow China to get a neighborly foothold like that.

My advice to you is that you go back to you mom's basement and play fortnight or what ever you play.

[Anonymous]

I feel bad for the Greenlanders. A quiet island suddenly caught up in nonsense because of Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So republicans are going to attack Greenland in winter. They will bomb and destroy infrastructure forcing the 600k residents of Greenland out on to the ice. For what?

The total population of Greenland is approximately 57,000. Over 26% (15,000) of Greenland's residents are above age 55.

Greenland needs to hold a special election ASAP to determine whether the new national language should be Mandarin or English. It's that simple.

Denmark cannot defend Greenland. Denmark's entire military has fewer members than the NYC police force.

Denmark has no legal or historical right to claim Greenland.

Greenlanders do not want to be Danish citizens. Greenlanders want to be Greenlanders, but this is unrealistic as both China & Russia want to occupy Greenland.

The USA can best defend and develop Greenland for the mutual benefit of Greenlanders, Americans, NATO members, and the Danish.

Greenland must become part of America in our rapidly developing and changing world or China will dominate.

Historically, the US has tried to purchase Greenland more than once.

So, Greenland--what do you prefer--to learn to speak Mandarin or to learn English ?

NATO can defend Greenland. So yeah, anyway...next.

Only with the support of the USA. Without American troops and weapons, NATO cannot stand against China.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The United States of America will not use military force against Greenland or against Denmark.

The USA will purchase Greenland from both Denmark & from the 57,000 citizens of Greenland.

If a purchase is refused, The USA will occupy Greenland, develop Greenland, and enrich not only America, but also Greenlanders and the country of Denmark.

Our current President sees the future in a clear and realistic manner.

If Trump goes the occupy route, it will not happen for a year plus. When MAGA is evicted from power, we will give it back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I feel bad for the Greenlanders. A quiet island suddenly caught up in nonsense because of Trump.

Wake up ! You think that the national defense of the USA and of the Western Hemisphere is nonsense ? That is foolish thinking that will aid China in becoming the world's superpower.

[Anonymous]

The tiny population of Greenland is centered primarily in two small towns. The Greenlanders may keep their current way of life and traditions while the USA enriches them & protects them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Considering that Trump is sick, fat, and very old, why does he care whether we get Greenland. Is it all about legacy or is someone more powerful, who he’s very afraid of, his puppet strings?

Expansionism. Ever since the USA was founded, leaders have tried to expand the territories. The world order changed post-WWII but the alpha male instinct to take more has never gone away.

I wonder who will run the operations. They’ve already gotten rid of competent leaders in the maga DEI program, and more current senior military leadership is saying that the attack would be illegal. Once we really get to the third string teams I think that we will have lost any advantages that we had, militarily, or at least a lot of it. We really only have to take one look at the economy to see how well it works out when you put loyalists in charge instead of competent people.

Plus, you have a million civilians that work for DoD. How many support Trump and his dementia wars?

I think you overestimate how many senior leaders have left the military or are willing to leave due to unlawful orders. Admiral Alvin Holsey resigned to avoid following illegal orders, but Kegsbreath easily replaced him with another Admiral who was willing to follow the illegal orders. There are probably a lot of Frank Bradley's in the military.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So republicans are going to attack Greenland in winter. They will bomb and destroy infrastructure forcing the 600k residents of Greenland out on to the ice. For what?

The total population of Greenland is approximately 57,000. Over 26% (15,000) of Greenland's residents are above age 55.

Greenland needs to hold a special election ASAP to determine whether the new national language should be Mandarin or English. It's that simple.

Denmark cannot defend Greenland. Denmark's entire military has fewer members than the NYC police force.

Denmark has no legal or historical right to claim Greenland.

Greenlanders do not want to be Danish citizens. Greenlanders want to be Greenlanders, but this is unrealistic as both China & Russia want to occupy Greenland.

The USA can best defend and develop Greenland for the mutual benefit of Greenlanders, Americans, NATO members, and the Danish.

Greenland must become part of America in our rapidly developing and changing world or China will dominate.

Historically, the US has tried to purchase Greenland more than once.

So, Greenland--what do you prefer--to learn to speak Mandarin or to learn English ?

Simping for the broligarchs. Lovely.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel bad for the Greenlanders. A quiet island suddenly caught up in nonsense because of Trump.

Wake up ! You think that the national defense of the USA and of the Western Hemisphere is nonsense ? That is foolish thinking that will aid China in becoming the world's superpower.

China isn’t interested in Greenland, moron.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So republicans are going to attack Greenland in winter. They will bomb and destroy infrastructure forcing the 600k residents of Greenland out on to the ice. For what?

The total population of Greenland is approximately 57,000. Over 26% (15,000) of Greenland's residents are above age 55.

Greenland needs to hold a special election ASAP to determine whether the new national language should be Mandarin or English. It's that simple.

Denmark cannot defend Greenland. Denmark's entire military has fewer members than the NYC police force.

Denmark has no legal or historical right to claim Greenland.

Greenlanders do not want to be Danish citizens. Greenlanders want to be Greenlanders, but this is unrealistic as both China & Russia want to occupy Greenland.

The USA can best defend and develop Greenland for the mutual benefit of Greenlanders, Americans, NATO members, and the Danish.

Greenland must become part of America in our rapidly developing and changing world or China will dominate.

Historically, the US has tried to purchase Greenland more than once.

So, Greenland--what do you prefer--to learn to speak Mandarin or to learn English ?

NATO can defend Greenland. So yeah, anyway...next.

Only with the support of the USA. Without American troops and weapons, NATO cannot stand against China.

Trump is handing the world to China and I am sure that they are still shocked by their good luck. They haven’t had to expend a yuan or a life to destroy America.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So republicans are going to attack Greenland in winter. They will bomb and destroy infrastructure forcing the 600k residents of Greenland out on to the ice. For what?

The total population of Greenland is approximately 57,000. Over 26% (15,000) of Greenland's residents are above age 55.

Greenland needs to hold a special election ASAP to determine whether the new national language should be Mandarin or English. It's that simple.

Denmark cannot defend Greenland. Denmark's entire military has fewer members than the NYC police force.

Denmark has no legal or historical right to claim Greenland.

Greenlanders do not want to be Danish citizens. Greenlanders want to be Greenlanders, but this is unrealistic as both China & Russia want to occupy Greenland.

The USA can best defend and develop Greenland for the mutual benefit of Greenlanders, Americans, NATO members, and the Danish.

Greenland must become part of America in our rapidly developing and changing world or China will dominate.

Historically, the US has tried to purchase Greenland more than once.

So, Greenland--what do you prefer--to learn to speak Mandarin or to learn English ?

NATO can defend Greenland. So yeah, anyway...next.

Only with the support of the USA. Without American troops and weapons, NATO cannot stand against China.

NATO cannot stand against China in Greenland? When's the last time you looked at a world map?