Trump says UFC match at WH next year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All I know is that some member of the press better ask the White House for a comment—soon— regarding the vile televised insult made against a former First Lady during the UFC event.

And here we have the official comment from the White House:

Why, oh why, won’t Black women vote Republican? /s

Black women?

[Anonymous]

That anyone can defend this shows how far we have sunk as a country.


It was stupid and fake.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Behold the master race attending this stately affair:

(Sorry, the only video I found is a reddit embed)

https://www.reddit.com/r/sportsgossips/comments/1u6hb3e/ufc_freedom_250_at_the_white_house_turns_into_a/

What else do you expect out of the trash people who would attend this?

[Anonymous]

The White House hadn’t condemned it yet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just putrid. So, so tacky. If I saw one of these people walking towards me, I'd cross the street. And that includes the POTUS. Revolting people.

Typical Democrat disdain for our military. Sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't watch boxing either but from the clips I saw, they pulled it off well and everyone seemed to enjoy themselves.

I do find the headlines of "defilement" a little amusing. Pride was hosted on the lawn a few years ago and there were activist posing topless in lieu of everyone. Inside the White House, there were people doing coke and making pornos. A boxing match on the front lawn isn't a Nuremberg rally. Lol

How do you feel about the UFC fighter’s “joke” about Michelle Obama being a man?

It was a dumb thing to say and I certainly don't condone it. Does that define the entire event?

Yes, it does. Because we're not talking about what anybody else said after winning their fight.

Whatever happened to all the "shut up and dribble" we used to hear from Fox News hosts whenever an NBA player expressed a political opinion?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just putrid. So, so tacky. If I saw one of these people walking towards me, I'd cross the street. And that includes the POTUS. Revolting people.

Typical Democrat disdain for our military. Sad.

Would you prefer OP address the military by Trumps preferred phrase? Suckers and losers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just putrid. So, so tacky. If I saw one of these people walking towards me, I'd cross the street. And that includes the POTUS. Revolting people.

Typical Democrat disdain for our military. Sad.

I'm sorry, what did you say?!

Veterans Have Borne Trump Administration’s Deep Cuts to Federal Personnel
https://www.cbpp.org/blog/veterans-have-borne-trump-administrations-deep-cuts-to-federal-personnel

Trump pledged to house 6,000 homeless vets. His budget funds zero
https://www.npr.org/2026/05/28/nx-s1-5836556/trump-homeless-veterans-la

Trump's VA killed a home loan program. Vets are now losing their homes because of it
https://www.npr.org/2026/04/02/nx-s1-5750814/veterans-mortgages-foreclosure-va-rescue

At Hearing, Former Responder Details Harm of Trump VA's Cuts on the Veterans Crisis Line
https://www.veterans.senate.gov/2025/6/at-hearing-former-responder-details-harm-of-trump-va-s-cuts-on-the-veterans-crisis-line/47e289d5-874f-43f8-b8cd-debec1232b19

House Republicans’ budget reconciliation legislation would take away health coverage and food assistance from many millions of people, including veterans. One out of every four veterans lived in a household receiving food assistance from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) or health coverage from Medicaid or Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) at some point in 2023.
https://www.cbpp.org/research/federal-budget/2025-budget-impacts-house-bill-would-cut-assistance-and-raise-costs-for-0

Even in his first term:
President Trump’s Extreme Budget Cuts Hurt Veterans
https://democrats-budget.house.gov/resources/reports/president-trumps-extreme-budget-cuts-hurt-veterans


..this is yet a small inkling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The White House hadn’t condemned it yet.

Why would they condemn it? Fully on brand. Do you not understand the meaning of the phrase "white christian nationalism?"

[Anonymous]

Who is Josh Hokit? Is this game of two men punching each other really that popular?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just putrid. So, so tacky. If I saw one of these people walking towards me, I'd cross the street. And that includes the POTUS. Revolting people.

Typical Democrat disdain for our military. Sad.

Let me know when 6 GOP members of congress get sued by a democratic president for repeating part of the military oath to the US Constitution.
Let me know when Democrats cut veterans benefits.
Let me know when democrats are openly hostile to "suckers and losers" who make the ultimate sacrifice for our country.

Do you have any idea how many servicemen have been maimed or killed under Trump 45 and Trump 47? It is a lot more than you think it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just putrid. So, so tacky. If I saw one of these people walking towards me, I'd cross the street. And that includes the POTUS. Revolting people.

Typical Democrat disdain for our military. Sad.

.

DP. The PP wasn’t talking about military personnel and you know it. I don’t know any immigrant Democrats who disdain the military so you can f right off.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Behold the master race attending this stately affair:

(Sorry, the only video I found is a reddit embed)

https://www.reddit.com/r/sportsgossips/comments/1u6hb3e/ufc_freedom_250_at_the_white_house_turns_into_a/

What else do you expect out of the trash people who would attend this?

For the most part it was the exact kind of person you’d expect.

Very disappointed that Nate Bargatze was there and even taking pictures with the locals. He will never get the stink off.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who is Josh Hokit? Is this game of two men punching each other really that popular?

With deplorables like the President, yes, it is.
Savagery is all they understand.