James Comey under investigation for insulting the king

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:At what point does this become straight up harassment?


Six lawsuits over several years? Not even.

You democrats set the benchmark. Enjoy the fruits of it.



I don’t think anyone loves Comey, but this is kindergarten 101
Anonymous
86 47

There, I said it.

impeach the mf

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:At what point does this become straight up harassment?


Six lawsuits over several years? Not even.

You democrats set the benchmark. Enjoy the fruits of it.

Not a single one of which was initiated by a DOJ that thinks it's Trump's personal law firm
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:At what point does this become straight up harassment?


Six lawsuits over several years? Not even.

You democrats set the benchmark. Enjoy the fruits of it.

What does this even refer to?
Anonymous
Anonymous
We’re paying for this frivolous case over beach shells or rocks?
“Whatever makes sense” - Vance
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:We’re paying for this frivolous case over beach shells or rocks?
“Whatever makes sense” - Vance


I'd love to see what they told the Grand Jury the standard for an actual threat was.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:At what point does this become straight up harassment?


Six lawsuits over several years? Not even.

You democrats set the benchmark. Enjoy the fruits of it.

What does this even refer to?


The deranged fictional MAGA-bubble narrative about "dem lawfare"
Anonymous
Why does the government think they can prove this is a true threat?
Anonymous
https://bsky.app/profile/annabower.bsky.social/post/3mkljqjixsc2b

In this clip, Kash Patel says the grand jury heard evidence that Comey deleted the '8647' post and apologized. Neither fact appears in the indictment.

Did the FBI director just disclose evidence presented before a grand jury?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:https://bsky.app/profile/annabower.bsky.social/post/3mkljqjixsc2b

In this clip, Kash Patel says the grand jury heard evidence that Comey deleted the '8647' post and apologized. Neither fact appears in the indictment.

Did the FBI director just disclose evidence presented before a grand jury?


What would be the ramifications if he did?
Anonymous
This is beyond ridiculous.

Anyone who has ever worked in law enforcement - this former prosecutor included - knows full well that the term ‘86’ refers to ejecting and/or barring a patron or employee from a place of business.

8647 is an exhortation to get that loser out of our people’s White House.

I can’t believe a brain dead grand jury in eastern district North Carolina voted to indict on these bogus charges.

I look forward to seeing James Comey again vindicated by due process of law.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:This is beyond ridiculous.

Anyone who has ever worked in law enforcement - this former prosecutor included - knows full well that the term ‘86’ refers to ejecting and/or barring a patron or employee from a place of business.

8647 is an exhortation to get that loser out of our people’s White House.

I can’t believe a brain dead grand jury in eastern district North Carolina voted to indict on these bogus charges.

I look forward to seeing James Comey again vindicated by due process of law.


How does the Eastern District of NC have jurisdiction? The judge is a Bush appointee. Were they jury shopping? Even if the 86 shells were referring to someone I loved, I don’t read it as a threat. But this is a fight amongst Republicans. Comey is reaping what he sowed.
Anonymous


Todd Blanche really, really, really wants to be formally appointed to head the DOJ.



Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is beyond ridiculous.

Anyone who has ever worked in law enforcement - this former prosecutor included - knows full well that the term ‘86’ refers to ejecting and/or barring a patron or employee from a place of business.

8647 is an exhortation to get that loser out of our people’s White House.

I can’t believe a brain dead grand jury in eastern district North Carolina voted to indict on these bogus charges.

I look forward to seeing James Comey again vindicated by due process of law.


How does the Eastern District of NC have jurisdiction? The judge is a Bush appointee. Were they jury shopping? Even if the 86 shells were referring to someone I loved, I don’t read it as a threat. But this is a fight amongst Republicans. Comey is reaping what he sowed.


I agree that that attention-seeking moron really deserves his comeuppance, but we need to defend all people against this administration's weaponization of justice.

post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: