Why would you equate a professional association of black journalists with a conservative network? Explain your thought process about how these things are the same |
This was not a “liberal network.” |
The fact that Republicans see a room full of journalists as hostile territory is pretty telling. |
That distinction is immaterial. It was a hostile group of people from the outset and he knew it would be so. Harris would never do the same. She can’t even hold a press conference. |
We all know that "this is what his voters like about him"--the fact that he says out loud all the hateful things that his voters are thinking. That is the key to his success. |
You’re implying that he answered questions and was effective. He was not. He demonstrated his declining cognitive state, his emotional instability, and his racism. He put on a remarkably poor performance. |
Nikki Haley. See what his MAGA says about that. ![]() |
NP but here’s the thing. I honestly don’t think Trump knew it would be a hostile group. Everyone else did- but he is such a textbook narcissist with a strong God complex that he really thinks all ‘blacks’ love him. And love what he did as president. He isn’t faking that part. |
You're assuming that everyone is liberal. Why? Because they are Black? Harris Faulkner from Fox News was one of the interviewers. This was a professional convention, not a liberal network. Stop assuming. |
Just WOW. Speechless. |
There was not a single question that was hostile. If someone for president cannot handle that, then maybe they are not fit for the job. |
Well, that’s for d*&Umned sure. |
A pro? Of what exactly? |
If he knew he was entering a "hostile" group, you'd think he'd be better prepared for the questions. He accused the first interviewer of being rude and horrible when she literally used his own words. One of the interviewers was from Fox News. It's telling that he thinks a group of black journalists is a hostile group. |
Pro-racist? |