American Riviera Orchard and Meghan Markle

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t love the idea of yet another celebrity lifestyle brand, but what else is MM supposed to do? I loved her on Suits but I can see why she wouldn’t want to be a struggling actress. I don’t think she has any other work history and I can’t see her working a corporate job. So lifestyle influencer actually sounds like a good fit.

As for Harry, I don’t know where he goes from here. Speaking engagements, maybe? Working for a non-profit?

Nobody likes a complainer so he can’t even be a motivational speaker. What would he speak on?

He talks about mental health and overcoming trauma. But I agree that I don’t find him inspiring or helpful. He’s built a brand on being a victim. There’s nothing noble in whining while living a privileged life. There’s nothing inspirational about not being able to get over your mother’s death. There’s nothing motivational about a guy who doesn’t have a real job and hasn’t accomplished anything in decades.

He hasn’t overcome trauma.

I didn’t say he overcame trauma. I said that’s what he talks about: mental health and overcoming trauma. That’s his brand: a grown man with a very public history of screwing up and doing nothing notable who rebranded under the bulletproof umbrella of mental health and trauma.

I’m not a fan, btw.

How can one talk about overcoming something they haven't overcome? Speakers aren't supposed to be de-motivational and depressing. Everyone wants an uplifting story. Which is why he's not going to be a sought after paid speaker.

I think he is working to overcome true trauma (major dysfunctional family, mom's mental health issues, dad's infidelity, mom's death) without many role models for emotional maturity and strength, but being born into insane wealth makes him unrelatable. He'd be better off devoting his life to charities for trauma survivors, especially underprivileged survivors of trauma, without trying to get pity for his own story.

Megan's life is not aspirational because she only has this platform due to marrying a royal. I think she also would be better off leaning into working for charities and keeping the spotlight on the cause, not herself.

They should have lived more below their means so they wouldn't have to make desperate moved. If they are paying for their own security detain that is tough, but nobody needs that big a house.

I always thought he should have stayed in the military. It seemed to be good for him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP a few pages back was correct: Meghan was hoping to "break the internet."

She'll be "broke" soon, so she's at least got that part right.

Which is it? She will be broke soon or have more than enough money? Both things have been claimed in this thread. You all need to get on the same page about their financial health.

It's all speculation which is why it's in the entertainment forum, remember?

Absolutely. The PP was just asking for clarification because there’s a conflict with the messaging here.

Or maybe anonymous people have different opinions. It's doesn't have to be a coordinated effort as I'm sure you're aware.

Of course. As suspected, there’s no logic behind your opinions.

They’re poor! They’re rich! They use their kids! They don’t care about their kids!

Carry on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t love the idea of yet another celebrity lifestyle brand, but what else is MM supposed to do? I loved her on Suits but I can see why she wouldn’t want to be a struggling actress. I don’t think she has any other work history and I can’t see her working a corporate job. So lifestyle influencer actually sounds like a good fit.

As for Harry, I don’t know where he goes from here. Speaking engagements, maybe? Working for a non-profit?

Nobody likes a complainer so he can’t even be a motivational speaker. What would he speak on?

He talks about mental health and overcoming trauma. But I agree that I don’t find him inspiring or helpful. He’s built a brand on being a victim. There’s nothing noble in whining while living a privileged life. There’s nothing inspirational about not being able to get over your mother’s death. There’s nothing motivational about a guy who doesn’t have a real job and hasn’t accomplished anything in decades.

He hasn’t overcome trauma.

I didn’t say he overcame trauma. I said that’s what he talks about: mental health and overcoming trauma. That’s his brand: a grown man with a very public history of screwing up and doing nothing notable who rebranded under the bulletproof umbrella of mental health and trauma.

I’m not a fan, btw.

How can one talk about overcoming something they haven't overcome? Speakers aren't supposed to be de-motivational and depressing. Everyone wants an uplifting story. Which is why he's not going to be a sought after paid speaker.

I think he is working to overcome true trauma (major dysfunctional family, mom's mental health issues, dad's infidelity, mom's death) without many role models for emotional maturity and strength, but being born into insane wealth makes him unrelatable. He'd be better off devoting his life to charities for trauma survivors, especially underprivileged survivors of trauma, without trying to get pity for his own story.

Megan's life is not aspirational because she only has this platform due to marrying a royal. I think she also would be better off leaning into working for charities and keeping the spotlight on the cause, not herself.

They should have lived more below their means so they wouldn't have to make desperate moved. If they are paying for their own security detain that is tough, but nobody needs that big a house.

Meghan's message would be uplifting to little girls everywhere to make sure they marry well. A tale as old as time.

And to do it twice (or more...)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP a few pages back was correct: Meghan was hoping to "break the internet."

She'll be "broke" soon, so she's at least got that part right.

Which is it? She will be broke soon or have more than enough money? Both things have been claimed in this thread. You all need to get on the same page about their financial health.

It's all speculation which is why it's in the entertainment forum, remember?

Absolutely. The PP was just asking for clarification because there’s a conflict with the messaging here.

Or maybe anonymous people have different opinions. It's doesn't have to be a coordinated effort as I'm sure you're aware.

Of course. As suspected, there’s no logic behind your opinions.

They’re poor! They’re rich! They use their kids! They don’t care about their kids!

Carry on.

We're trying, but you keep interjecting with your inane "gotchas". Take a break, the grownups are talking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP a few pages back was correct: Meghan was hoping to "break the internet."

She'll be "broke" soon, so she's at least got that part right.

Which is it? She will be broke soon or have more than enough money? Both things have been claimed in this thread. You all need to get on the same page about their financial health.

It's all speculation which is why it's in the entertainment forum, remember?

Absolutely. The PP was just asking for clarification because there’s a conflict with the messaging here.

Or maybe anonymous people have different opinions. It's doesn't have to be a coordinated effort as I'm sure you're aware.

Of course. As suspected, there’s no logic behind your opinions.

They’re poor! They’re rich! They use their kids! They don’t care about their kids!

Carry on.

It's entertainment. We can even use tabloid articles as "facts". None of it has to make sense. I'm sure there are other threads you can visit that would be more fun for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP a few pages back was correct: Meghan was hoping to "break the internet."

She'll be "broke" soon, so she's at least got that part right.

Which is it? She will be broke soon or have more than enough money? Both things have been claimed in this thread. You all need to get on the same page about their financial health.

It's all speculation which is why it's in the entertainment forum, remember?

😢 all y’all princess puff power posse worshippers are so mean to the objective polite super calm posters jonesing for new theories.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP a few pages back was correct: Meghan was hoping to "break the internet."

She'll be "broke" soon, so she's at least got that part right.

Which is it? She will be broke soon or have more than enough money? Both things have been claimed in this thread. You all need to get on the same page about their financial health.

It's all speculation which is why it's in the entertainment forum, remember?

😢 all y’all princess puff power posse worshippers are so mean to the objective polite super calm posters jonesing for new theories.

knew it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t love the idea of yet another celebrity lifestyle brand, but what else is MM supposed to do? I loved her on Suits but I can see why she wouldn’t want to be a struggling actress. I don’t think she has any other work history and I can’t see her working a corporate job. So lifestyle influencer actually sounds like a good fit.

As for Harry, I don’t know where he goes from here. Speaking engagements, maybe? Working for a non-profit?

Nobody likes a complainer so he can’t even be a motivational speaker. What would he speak on?

He talks about mental health and overcoming trauma. But I agree that I don’t find him inspiring or helpful. He’s built a brand on being a victim. There’s nothing noble in whining while living a privileged life. There’s nothing inspirational about not being able to get over your mother’s death. There’s nothing motivational about a guy who doesn’t have a real job and hasn’t accomplished anything in decades.

He hasn’t overcome trauma.

I didn’t say he overcame trauma. I said that’s what he talks about: mental health and overcoming trauma. That’s his brand: a grown man with a very public history of screwing up and doing nothing notable who rebranded under the bulletproof umbrella of mental health and trauma.

I’m not a fan, btw.

How can one talk about overcoming something they haven't overcome? Speakers aren't supposed to be de-motivational and depressing. Everyone wants an uplifting story. Which is why he's not going to be a sought after paid speaker.

I think he is working to overcome true trauma (major dysfunctional family, mom's mental health issues, dad's infidelity, mom's death) without many role models for emotional maturity and strength, but being born into insane wealth makes him unrelatable. He'd be better off devoting his life to charities for trauma survivors, especially underprivileged survivors of trauma, without trying to get pity for his own story.

Megan's life is not aspirational because she only has this platform due to marrying a royal. I think she also would be better off leaning into working for charities and keeping the spotlight on the cause, not herself.

They should have lived more below their means so they wouldn't have to make desperate moved. If they are paying for their own security detain that is tough, but nobody needs that big a house.

Meghan's message would be uplifting to little girls everywhere to make sure they marry well. A tale as old as time.

And to do it twice (or more...)

She never asked of husband #1, but is he kind? And that’s why he made no sense for her. Thank goodness the Afrika Korps pot found his amazing humanitarian lid. To the jam pots!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP a few pages back was correct: Meghan was hoping to "break the internet."

She'll be "broke" soon, so she's at least got that part right.

Which is it? She will be broke soon or have more than enough money? Both things have been claimed in this thread. You all need to get on the same page about their financial health.

It's all speculation which is why it's in the entertainment forum, remember?

Absolutely. The PP was just asking for clarification because there’s a conflict with the messaging here.

Or maybe anonymous people have different opinions. It's doesn't have to be a coordinated effort as I'm sure you're aware.

Of course. As suspected, there’s no logic behind your opinions.

They’re poor! They’re rich! They use their kids! They don’t care about their kids!

Carry on.

We're trying, but you keep interjecting with your inane "gotchas". Take a break, the grownups are talking.

No gotchas from me. I’m just observing and commenting like everyone. You can ignore me if you find me an interruption.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP a few pages back was correct: Meghan was hoping to "break the internet."

She'll be "broke" soon, so she's at least got that part right.

Which is it? She will be broke soon or have more than enough money? Both things have been claimed in this thread. You all need to get on the same page about their financial health.

It's all speculation which is why it's in the entertainment forum, remember?

Absolutely. The PP was just asking for clarification because there’s a conflict with the messaging here.

Or maybe anonymous people have different opinions. It's doesn't have to be a coordinated effort as I'm sure you're aware.

Of course. As suspected, there’s no logic behind your opinions.

They’re poor! They’re rich! They use their kids! They don’t care about their kids!

Carry on.

It's entertainment. We can even use tabloid articles as "facts". None of it has to make sense. I'm sure there are other threads you can visit that would be more fun for you.

Lol. Wannabe moderator, just keep calm and carry on reporting everything. The PP and everyone else can choose what to read and what to respond to. Unless of course you need to again unburden yourself with screeds about what is entertainment….

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP a few pages back was correct: Meghan was hoping to "break the internet."

She'll be "broke" soon, so she's at least got that part right.

Which is it? She will be broke soon or have more than enough money? Both things have been claimed in this thread. You all need to get on the same page about their financial health.

It's all speculation which is why it's in the entertainment forum, remember?

Absolutely. The PP was just asking for clarification because there’s a conflict with the messaging here.

Or maybe anonymous people have different opinions. It's doesn't have to be a coordinated effort as I'm sure you're aware.

Of course. As suspected, there’s no logic behind your opinions.

They’re poor! They’re rich! They use their kids! They don’t care about their kids!

Carry on.

It's entertainment. We can even use tabloid articles as "facts". None of it has to make sense. I'm sure there are other threads you can visit that would be more fun for you.

Lol. Wannabe moderator, just keep calm and carry on reporting everything. The PP and everyone else can choose what to read and what to respond to. Unless of course you need to again unburden yourself with screeds about what is entertainment….

Okay... back to the topic.

I wonder if the new CA state income taxes for the 1% will hasten a decision to look for greener pastures elsewhere. It's an insane expensive lifestyle in an insanely expensive state. Makes it even harder to keep your head above water.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP a few pages back was correct: Meghan was hoping to "break the internet."

She'll be "broke" soon, so she's at least got that part right.

Which is it? She will be broke soon or have more than enough money? Both things have been claimed in this thread. You all need to get on the same page about their financial health.

It's all speculation which is why it's in the entertainment forum, remember?

Absolutely. The PP was just asking for clarification because there’s a conflict with the messaging here.

Or maybe anonymous people have different opinions. It's doesn't have to be a coordinated effort as I'm sure you're aware.

Of course. As suspected, there’s no logic behind your opinions.

They’re poor! They’re rich! They use their kids! They don’t care about their kids!

Carry on.

It's entertainment. We can even use tabloid articles as "facts". None of it has to make sense. I'm sure there are other threads you can visit that would be more fun for you.

I’m hanging out in all the threads. All are fun for me.

Don’t mind me. Please continue with your “grownup” discussion. I’ll join in as I see fit.

[Anonymous]

I'm still curious who the target market would be and where these goods would be for sale. If its jams and honey it's probably designed to be super low budget with a fancy crest and monogram for overpriced mass produced products for people who really want a piece of this American royal fairytale they are trying to push.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP a few pages back was correct: Meghan was hoping to "break the internet."

She'll be "broke" soon, so she's at least got that part right.

Which is it? She will be broke soon or have more than enough money? Both things have been claimed in this thread. You all need to get on the same page about their financial health.

It's all speculation which is why it's in the entertainment forum, remember?

Absolutely. The PP was just asking for clarification because there’s a conflict with the messaging here.

Or maybe anonymous people have different opinions. It's doesn't have to be a coordinated effort as I'm sure you're aware.

Of course. As suspected, there’s no logic behind your opinions.

They’re poor! They’re rich! They use their kids! They don’t care about their kids!

Carry on.

We're trying, but you keep interjecting with your inane "gotchas". Take a break, the grownups are talking.

We like it here, we like to be observe what grownups talk about. If we need clarification we will ask for it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP a few pages back was correct: Meghan was hoping to "break the internet."

She'll be "broke" soon, so she's at least got that part right.

Which is it? She will be broke soon or have more than enough money? Both things have been claimed in this thread. You all need to get on the same page about their financial health.

It's all speculation which is why it's in the entertainment forum, remember?

Absolutely. The PP was just asking for clarification because there’s a conflict with the messaging here.

Or maybe anonymous people have different opinions. It's doesn't have to be a coordinated effort as I'm sure you're aware.

Of course. As suspected, there’s no logic behind your opinions.

They’re poor! They’re rich! They use their kids! They don’t care about their kids!

Carry on.

We're trying, but you keep interjecting with your inane "gotchas". Take a break, the grownups are talking.

We like it here, we like to be observe what grownups talk about. If we need clarification we will ask for it.

Exactly. 😆😆