US Capitol Breached by Trump's lunatics

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I truly don't get why the MAGAs keep saying "they were waved in."

It doesn't exonerate ANYONE.

It doesn't magically make the smashed windows and doors go away, it doesn't make all the violence go away.

There were 1200 police and security, but just because a handful of them "waved in" rioters, that means absolutely nothing.

If anything, it brings those officers into question. The overwhelming majority of police did their best to do their duty, to try and defend the Capitol. The handful that didn't - at best went derelict on their duties and abandoned their responsibilities, and are not fit to serve. At worst they aided and abetted the violent terrorists. Those officers need to be investigated. Some of them probably belong behind bars with the rest of the J6 terrorists.

+1

If a cop tells me I can steal a car off of a car lot, it doesn't mean I can legally steal it. I wouldn't expect to be set free when other cops arrest me for stealimg it.

You actually would have a great case against the officer and would probably indeed be set free, so long as it was on video or audio. Probably would have the charges dropped.

Fronting like you got a law degree but I doubt you finished high school? AmIrite?

You got me

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

So happy about this.

Should have been sentenced to just the year so he can’t get credit for good time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I truly don't get why the MAGAs keep saying "they were waved in."

It doesn't exonerate ANYONE.

It doesn't magically make the smashed windows and doors go away, it doesn't make all the violence go away.

There were 1200 police and security, but just because a handful of them "waved in" rioters, that means absolutely nothing.

If anything, it brings those officers into question. The overwhelming majority of police did their best to do their duty, to try and defend the Capitol. The handful that didn't - at best went derelict on their duties and abandoned their responsibilities, and are not fit to serve. At worst they aided and abetted the violent terrorists. Those officers need to be investigated. Some of them probably belong behind bars with the rest of the J6 terrorists.

Actually it means a lot. Police waving people in can be legally taken as an invite.

Yes. Absolutely. Sure because invitations always come with stepping over broken glass and spattered blood, the sound of screaming, blaring alarms and the smell of teargas in your nostrils.

Doesn't everyone welcome people to their homes like that?

THAT WAS SARCASM IF THE COMPLETE MORON WHO SAID "can be legally taken as an invite" DIDN'T GET IT.

Was every door like that?

Really? Was every door like that?

I think you've just outed yourself as someone who's never set foot in DC and has never been to a federal office in their entire life. EVERY door has security and protocols. Civilians aren't even allowed in AT ALL at most of the doors - they are only allowed in at main entrances, and then only after you've stated your business, have been logged in, and have gone through a metal detector.

I meant broken down so people could just walk in . There is footage of a police officer opening one of the doors that was locked. He actually had it unlocked.

If a Capitol Police officer did that then it means he violated protocols and put the US Capitol complex at risk. He needs to be investigated and prosecuted. And, how would the rioters have even known to go to that door in the first place, when it is normally not allowed for public access? Why would he have unlocked a door that was supposed to stay locked, unless he was a J6 co-conspirator working with the Oathkeepers and Proud Boys? This needs to be investigated.

Again NONE of this exonerates or excuses the J6 rioters, it only makes it worse for them by elevating it to a bigger, pre-planned conspiracy to overthrow American democracy, and makes it all that much worse for any officers who participated in it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I truly don't get why the MAGAs keep saying "they were waved in."

It doesn't exonerate ANYONE.

It doesn't magically make the smashed windows and doors go away, it doesn't make all the violence go away.

There were 1200 police and security, but just because a handful of them "waved in" rioters, that means absolutely nothing.

If anything, it brings those officers into question. The overwhelming majority of police did their best to do their duty, to try and defend the Capitol. The handful that didn't - at best went derelict on their duties and abandoned their responsibilities, and are not fit to serve. At worst they aided and abetted the violent terrorists. Those officers need to be investigated. Some of them probably belong behind bars with the rest of the J6 terrorists.

Actually it means a lot. Police waving people in can be legally taken as an invite.

Yes. Absolutely. Sure because invitations always come with stepping over broken glass and spattered blood, the sound of screaming, blaring alarms and the smell of teargas in your nostrils.

Doesn't everyone welcome people to their homes like that?

THAT WAS SARCASM IF THE COMPLETE MORON WHO SAID "can be legally taken as an invite" DIDN'T GET IT.

Was every door like that?

Really? Was every door like that?

I think you've just outed yourself as someone who's never set foot in DC and has never been to a federal office in their entire life. EVERY door has security and protocols. Civilians aren't even allowed in AT ALL at most of the doors - they are only allowed in at main entrances, and then only after you've stated your business, have been logged in, and have gone through a metal detector.

I meant broken down so people could just walk in . There is footage of a police officer opening one of the doors that was locked. He actually had it unlocked.

If a Capitol Police officer did that then it means he violated protocols and put the US Capitol complex at risk. He needs to be investigated and prosecuted. And, how would the rioters have even known to go to that door in the first place, when it is normally not allowed for public access? Why would he have unlocked a door that was supposed to stay locked, unless he was a J6 co-conspirator working with the Oathkeepers and Proud Boys? This needs to be investigated.

Again NONE of this exonerates or excuses the J6 rioters, it only makes it worse for them by elevating it to a bigger, pre-planned conspiracy to overthrow American democracy, and makes it all that much worse for any officers who participated in it.

All very good points, all to be very much ignored by the conservative pps.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I truly don't get why the MAGAs keep saying "they were waved in."

It doesn't exonerate ANYONE.

It doesn't magically make the smashed windows and doors go away, it doesn't make all the violence go away.

There were 1200 police and security, but just because a handful of them "waved in" rioters, that means absolutely nothing.

If anything, it brings those officers into question. The overwhelming majority of police did their best to do their duty, to try and defend the Capitol. The handful that didn't - at best went derelict on their duties and abandoned their responsibilities, and are not fit to serve. At worst they aided and abetted the violent terrorists. Those officers need to be investigated. Some of them probably belong behind bars with the rest of the J6 terrorists.

Actually it means a lot. Police waving people in can be legally taken as an invite.

Yes. Absolutely. Sure because invitations always come with stepping over broken glass and spattered blood, the sound of screaming, blaring alarms and the smell of teargas in your nostrils.

Doesn't everyone welcome people to their homes like that?

THAT WAS SARCASM IF THE COMPLETE MORON WHO SAID "can be legally taken as an invite" DIDN'T GET IT.

Was every door like that?

Really? Was every door like that?

I think you've just outed yourself as someone who's never set foot in DC and has never been to a federal office in their entire life. EVERY door has security and protocols. Civilians aren't even allowed in AT ALL at most of the doors - they are only allowed in at main entrances, and then only after you've stated your business, have been logged in, and have gone through a metal detector.

I meant broken down so people could just walk in . There is footage of a police officer opening one of the doors that was locked. He actually had it unlocked.

If a Capitol Police officer did that then it means he violated protocols and put the US Capitol complex at risk. He needs to be investigated and prosecuted. And, how would the rioters have even known to go to that door in the first place, when it is normally not allowed for public access? Why would he have unlocked a door that was supposed to stay locked, unless he was a J6 co-conspirator working with the Oathkeepers and Proud Boys? This needs to be investigated.

Again NONE of this exonerates or excuses the J6 rioters, it only makes it worse for them by elevating it to a bigger, pre-planned conspiracy to overthrow American democracy, and makes it all that much worse for any officers who participated in it.

How have you not seen this video yet? And if you haven't seen this video, you might want to ask yourself why the sources you trust to inform you didn't want you to see it. Could be a co-conspirator, could be entrapment. And you're right, it needs to be investigated.

Again, if you have not seen this detailed video, what else do you think you could have missed?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I truly don't get why the MAGAs keep saying "they were waved in."

It doesn't exonerate ANYONE.

It doesn't magically make the smashed windows and doors go away, it doesn't make all the violence go away.

There were 1200 police and security, but just because a handful of them "waved in" rioters, that means absolutely nothing.

If anything, it brings those officers into question. The overwhelming majority of police did their best to do their duty, to try and defend the Capitol. The handful that didn't - at best went derelict on their duties and abandoned their responsibilities, and are not fit to serve. At worst they aided and abetted the violent terrorists. Those officers need to be investigated. Some of them probably belong behind bars with the rest of the J6 terrorists.

Actually it means a lot. Police waving people in can be legally taken as an invite.

Yes. Absolutely. Sure because invitations always come with stepping over broken glass and spattered blood, the sound of screaming, blaring alarms and the smell of teargas in your nostrils.

Doesn't everyone welcome people to their homes like that?

THAT WAS SARCASM IF THE COMPLETE MORON WHO SAID "can be legally taken as an invite" DIDN'T GET IT.

Was every door like that?

Really? Was every door like that?

I think you've just outed yourself as someone who's never set foot in DC and has never been to a federal office in their entire life. EVERY door has security and protocols. Civilians aren't even allowed in AT ALL at most of the doors - they are only allowed in at main entrances, and then only after you've stated your business, have been logged in, and have gone through a metal detector.

I meant broken down so people could just walk in . There is footage of a police officer opening one of the doors that was locked. He actually had it unlocked.

If a Capitol Police officer did that then it means he violated protocols and put the US Capitol complex at risk. He needs to be investigated and prosecuted. And, how would the rioters have even known to go to that door in the first place, when it is normally not allowed for public access? Why would he have unlocked a door that was supposed to stay locked, unless he was a J6 co-conspirator working with the Oathkeepers and Proud Boys? This needs to be investigated.

Again NONE of this exonerates or excuses the J6 rioters, it only makes it worse for them by elevating it to a bigger, pre-planned conspiracy to overthrow American democracy, and makes it all that much worse for any officers who participated in it.

How have you not seen this video yet? And if you haven't seen this video, you might want to ask yourself why the sources you trust to inform you didn't want you to see it. Could be a co-conspirator, could be entrapment. And you're right, it needs to be investigated.

Again, if you have not seen this detailed video, what else do you think you could have missed?

You are gaslighting. No one was “invited” in. After a lot of the mob had already broken in through windows and opened doors from inside, Capitol police were withdrawn from the doors to protect the House and Senate chambers until Members could be evacuated or safely sheltered. MPD kept fighting. No police let intruders in before the building was already overrun. It wasn’t entrapment. The criminals knew they were there illegally. They all were there to prevent Congress from certifying the electoral votes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I truly don't get why the MAGAs keep saying "they were waved in."

It doesn't exonerate ANYONE.

It doesn't magically make the smashed windows and doors go away, it doesn't make all the violence go away.

There were 1200 police and security, but just because a handful of them "waved in" rioters, that means absolutely nothing.

If anything, it brings those officers into question. The overwhelming majority of police did their best to do their duty, to try and defend the Capitol. The handful that didn't - at best went derelict on their duties and abandoned their responsibilities, and are not fit to serve. At worst they aided and abetted the violent terrorists. Those officers need to be investigated. Some of them probably belong behind bars with the rest of the J6 terrorists.

Actually it means a lot. Police waving people in can be legally taken as an invite.

Yes. Absolutely. Sure because invitations always come with stepping over broken glass and spattered blood, the sound of screaming, blaring alarms and the smell of teargas in your nostrils.

Doesn't everyone welcome people to their homes like that?

THAT WAS SARCASM IF THE COMPLETE MORON WHO SAID "can be legally taken as an invite" DIDN'T GET IT.

Was every door like that?

Really? Was every door like that?

I think you've just outed yourself as someone who's never set foot in DC and has never been to a federal office in their entire life. EVERY door has security and protocols. Civilians aren't even allowed in AT ALL at most of the doors - they are only allowed in at main entrances, and then only after you've stated your business, have been logged in, and have gone through a metal detector.

I meant broken down so people could just walk in . There is footage of a police officer opening one of the doors that was locked. He actually had it unlocked.

If a Capitol Police officer did that then it means he violated protocols and put the US Capitol complex at risk. He needs to be investigated and prosecuted. And, how would the rioters have even known to go to that door in the first place, when it is normally not allowed for public access? Why would he have unlocked a door that was supposed to stay locked, unless he was a J6 co-conspirator working with the Oathkeepers and Proud Boys? This needs to be investigated.

Again NONE of this exonerates or excuses the J6 rioters, it only makes it worse for them by elevating it to a bigger, pre-planned conspiracy to overthrow American democracy, and makes it all that much worse for any officers who participated in it.

How have you not seen this video yet? And if you haven't seen this video, you might want to ask yourself why the sources you trust to inform you didn't want you to see it. Could be a co-conspirator, could be entrapment. And you're right, it needs to be investigated.

Again, if you have not seen this detailed video, what else do you think you could have missed?

You mean this video?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pgEVZkVGcaI

I don't know who opened the door, but some police are just standing by.

[Anonymous]

https://www.factcheck.org/2021/05/video-doesnt-prove-capitol-police-allowed-jan-6-protesters-to-enter-capitol/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I truly don't get why the MAGAs keep saying "they were waved in."

It doesn't exonerate ANYONE.

It doesn't magically make the smashed windows and doors go away, it doesn't make all the violence go away.

There were 1200 police and security, but just because a handful of them "waved in" rioters, that means absolutely nothing.

If anything, it brings those officers into question. The overwhelming majority of police did their best to do their duty, to try and defend the Capitol. The handful that didn't - at best went derelict on their duties and abandoned their responsibilities, and are not fit to serve. At worst they aided and abetted the violent terrorists. Those officers need to be investigated. Some of them probably belong behind bars with the rest of the J6 terrorists.

Actually it means a lot. Police waving people in can be legally taken as an invite.

Yes. Absolutely. Sure because invitations always come with stepping over broken glass and spattered blood, the sound of screaming, blaring alarms and the smell of teargas in your nostrils.

Doesn't everyone welcome people to their homes like that?

THAT WAS SARCASM IF THE COMPLETE MORON WHO SAID "can be legally taken as an invite" DIDN'T GET IT.

Was every door like that?

Really? Was every door like that?

I think you've just outed yourself as someone who's never set foot in DC and has never been to a federal office in their entire life. EVERY door has security and protocols. Civilians aren't even allowed in AT ALL at most of the doors - they are only allowed in at main entrances, and then only after you've stated your business, have been logged in, and have gone through a metal detector.

I meant broken down so people could just walk in . There is footage of a police officer opening one of the doors that was locked. He actually had it unlocked.

If a Capitol Police officer did that then it means he violated protocols and put the US Capitol complex at risk. He needs to be investigated and prosecuted. And, how would the rioters have even known to go to that door in the first place, when it is normally not allowed for public access? Why would he have unlocked a door that was supposed to stay locked, unless he was a J6 co-conspirator working with the Oathkeepers and Proud Boys? This needs to be investigated.

Again NONE of this exonerates or excuses the J6 rioters, it only makes it worse for them by elevating it to a bigger, pre-planned conspiracy to overthrow American democracy, and makes it all that much worse for any officers who participated in it.

How have you not seen this video yet? And if you haven't seen this video, you might want to ask yourself why the sources you trust to inform you didn't want you to see it. Could be a co-conspirator, could be entrapment. And you're right, it needs to be investigated.

Again, if you have not seen this detailed video, what else do you think you could have missed?

You mean this video?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pgEVZkVGcaI

I don't know who opened the door, but some police are just standing by.

No, not that clip. There's a 2+ minute video from the inside.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.factcheck.org/2021/05/video-doesnt-prove-capitol-police-allowed-jan-6-protesters-to-enter-capitol/

Not the clip.Sorry

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am sure this will please many of the people who frequent this thread.

Not me. This doesn’t make me happy at all. I’d much rather he pay his dues, then go back out to society having learned from his experience and share with others that he made mistakes and voting is the answer, not violent coups. Instead, another life has been lost due to 1/6. That makes me sad.

The reason they are committing suicide is because they are having the crap beat out of them and have lost hope that they are ever getting out.

Are you under the impression that this guy killed himself in prison? He did not, he was at home in Williamsport, PA.

Trauma. Hopelessness. Government attacks. Same diff.

You think there’s no “diff” being in jail awaiting sentencing vs. being at home?

Nope. When you know you wont get a fair shake, and the place you are going is pure hell, there's no diff.

69 year old cancer patient placed in jail for two months. A frail older lady. Hope you all feel like real he-men

Pooor snowflakes. All big and mean as they broke down doors and threatened the lives of innocent people at the capital that day. They were seditious traitors ready to kill in the name of a concept they don't understand. They only want freedom for what they want and want anyone else in jail. These lovely friends of yours attacked and attempted to kill police but, sniff sniff, we should all look the other way. Let's be clear about who was acting like brainless thugs or he-men as you like to call them. Btw fool, frail older ladies go to jail all the time particularly if they are black. None of you ever would cry tears over that.

Are you taking about rioters with cancer being out in jail? It’s simple. If you don’t want to go to jail when you have cancer or are old, then don’t try to overthrow the government.

You want us to feel sorry for anti-Americans and anti-democracy people? I don’t. They made their bed and had no problem trying to kill the VP. They were doing Purim’s work for him. Putin is the dictator of Russia in case you don’t know.

[Anonymous]

I’m still waiting for those that are linking to old video and old fact checking to speak about the 2+ minute video. I haven’t posted it because I want to see who will do the work to find it (it’s not much work, but takes liberals out of their comfort zone). I believe it was acquired through FOIA - Judicial Watch has been doing the hard legal work on this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m still waiting for those that are linking to old video and old fact checking to speak about the 2+ minute video. I haven’t posted it because I want to see who will do the work to find it (it’s not much work, but takes liberals out of their comfort zone). I believe it was acquired through FOIA - Judicial Watch has been doing the hard legal work on this.

Has Judicial watch contacted DOJ to prosecute the police?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hey DCUM, is this your chiropractor who stormed the Capitol? David Walls-Kaufman?

This a**hole took a baton off of MPD Officer Jeff Smith and hit him in the head with it. Smith complained of head trauma and died by suicide a week after the riot.
https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/january-6-dc-police-jeffrey-smith-riots-suicide/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m still waiting for those that are linking to old video and old fact checking to speak about the 2+ minute video. I haven’t posted it because I want to see who will do the work to find it (it’s not much work, but takes liberals out of their comfort zone). I believe it was acquired through FOIA - Judicial Watch has been doing the hard legal work on this.

“Why don’t you just tell me the name of the movie you selected?”