Art teacher used non-washable paint. Outfit ruined.

[Anonymous]

Hanna Andersson dress that was purchased at thrift store bc I really can't afford HA. Only $5 but DD only wore it twice. Why did she use non-washable paint??? Waaaah. Rant over.

[Anonymous]

I'm sorry.

[Anonymous]

I'm sorry -- I'd be annoyed, too.

[Anonymous]

Which thrift store? Do tell.....

[Anonymous]

Not all washable paint really washes out. I only send old clothing I do not care about to school as the paint, markers and stamping never come out and I've seen the bottles marked washable.

[Anonymous]

Why send DC to an art class in an expensive outfit?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why send DC to an art class in an expensive outfit?

+100
Sorry that the outfit is ruined but you should never send kids to school in anything you would not mind getting messed up a bit.

[Anonymous]

Why weren't the kids wearing smocks?

[Anonymous]

Did the teacher paint on her? If not, then it's your kid's fault, not the teacher's.

[Anonymous]

Good for you for not forking over full price for trendy kid's clothes! Such a ripoff, since it either gets ruined or outgrown in a heartbeat.

But yeah, I'd be annoyed too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did the teacher paint on her? If not, then it's your kid's fault, not the teacher's.

Little kid finds a gun and shoots himself/ his friend. Did the gun-owning parent shoot the kid? If not, it's the kid's fault, not the gun-owning parent's, right?

[Anonymous]

for gym days, wear sneakers

for art days, wear clothes that can get messy

my kids wear clothes with some paint on them to school - a badge of creativity

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why send DC to an art class in an expensive outfit?

+100
Sorry that the outfit is ruined but you should never send kids to school in anything you would not mind getting messed up a bit.

It was only $5. And yes she was wearing a smock but it got on her sleeves. Couldn't she tell the, to roll up their sleeves? DD is only 5!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did the teacher paint on her? If not, then it's your kid's fault, not the teacher's.

Little kid finds a gun and shoots himself/ his friend. Did the gun-owning parent shoot the kid? If not, it's the kid's fault, not the gun-owning parent's, right?

Are you really equating a child shot dead with a $5 dress? If you can't see the degree of difference, then you go right ahead and roll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did the teacher paint on her? If not, then it's your kid's fault, not the teacher's.

Little kid finds a gun and shoots himself/ his friend. Did the gun-owning parent shoot the kid? If not, it's the kid's fault, not the gun-owning parent's, right?

Are you really equating a child shot dead with a $5 dress? If you can't see the degree of difference, then you go right ahead and roll.

Are you really not admitting that parents and teachers have a responsibility to children? Are you really attributing "fault" to a five-year-old who was given paint??