Revolving Door at Holton

[Anonymous]

Allegations of fact are not cyberbullying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Allegations of fact are not cyberbullying.

Noncorroborated allegations of “facts” by anonymous posters ARE cyber bullying.

[Anonymous]

Not when they're about perceived wrongdoing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not when they're about perceived wrongdoing.

Yes, when the perception seems to be distorted. Read the OP.

[Anonymous]

Gaslighting accusers is straight out of the DARVO playbook.

[Anonymous]

Denying a false statement is simply setting the record straight, not DARVO.

[Anonymous]

Is it your contention that every single statement in the OP is false?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is it your contention that every single statement in the OP is false?

No, some are plainly false and some uncorroborated.

[Anonymous]

So what parts of the OP are true?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So what parts of the OP are true?

When one anynomous person say things that doesn’t become automatically true. Otherwise all things that trump say are true as well. Don’t see all Holton parents supporting OP. I wouldn’t say that everything is false. Just uncorroborated. Or in other terms, the opinion of a single person that is as valuable as my own opinion.

[Anonymous]

But the OP didn't contain only opinions. It started with certain allegations of fact:

"Another month, another senior administrator leaves Holton – this time it’s the Director of Communications. This is the fourth Director of Communications in Penny’s short, two-year tenure."

It shouldn't be hard to determine whether these contentions are true or false.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:But the OP didn't contain only opinions. It started with certain allegations of fact:

"Another month, another senior administrator leaves Holton – this time it’s the Director of Communications. This is the fourth Director of Communications in Penny’s short, two-year tenure."

It shouldn't be hard to determine whether these contentions are true or false.

OP attributes all departures to a single person. Unless you ask people that leave and get confirmation from them about the reasons for their departure you cannot seriously claim that is a factual statement. I am sorry to disappoint you.

[Anonymous]

But I'm not talking about the rest of what OP said (i.e., assigning blame). Are the allegations in the first two sentences of the OP true, regardless whether or not they are attributable to the HOS?

[Anonymous]

Yes it's true

[Anonymous]

Maybe yes maybe not. But the underlying premise of all the posts is that a single person is causing all the reported “facts”. All of that seems to be pretty much a speculation since not everyone agrees with that assessment. Your perception is as valid as mine. What makes the difference is if that perception is matched by reality. So far that’s not the case.