Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

I think that the Sony HR leaks were intentional. I don’t know where the leak came from but Ryan and Blake coming out a day or so after the leak makes me think they needed it before their appearance on SNL to sway the public in their direction a bit. I don’t think they would’ve gone otherwise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a stunning dress. From the SNL red carpet.

She looks like a foot.

I think she looks great! Especially for someone with 4 kids. She had wider hips and a little pooch in the front so I think the style of dress just accentuates that but overall she looks pretty great here. Very glam!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Seriously how much did RR and BL pay SNL for that little skit?

Ari horse trading. They all want this to go away and this signals Blake and Ryan are going to have to pay up and settle. Quickly.

[Anonymous]

The fact that Slate and the other actress hasn’t come out to say the HR complaints are false makes me wonder if they are real.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Because false claims of SH are just so light and funny!!!

You need to calm down. We get it.

I don’t think you get it since people on here literally just said this was funny. It’s not funny. Your wife was allegedly sexually harassed. He should have just sat in his seat if he wanted to go out tonight.

No, they said it was funny that he made fun of himself – not that he himself was funny. You seem to have a parasocial relationship with this whole situation. Take a step back.

If my husband made fun of my SH I would be LIVID. Sit down.

The joke has nothing to do with making fun of her SH. It’s making fun of the crazy level of publicity that has surrounded the whole thing. This was *scripted.* Obviously they both knew and approved of the joke.

Agree. It's not funny as some overarching statement re whether the SH did or didn't happen. It's about the publicity,

Even joking about SH publicity is in bad taste and disrespectful to your wife.

No SH occurred. He knows this. This was likely the roll out of them trying to laugh this off and put a lid on this mess. Hopefully JB pockets tens of millions of dollars from these two scammers.

That is sure what that whole scene looked like to me. Let’s laugh this off now.

It’s their only move. I think they’re vile but of course they must play it off easy-breezy even though he’s haggard despite the tux and fresh hair dye, and her FUPA and Guy Fawkes face strain against the new upper lip filler and improved hair toner. I would love to know what ScarJo made of all the mess (visual and otherwise.)

I don’t think the new HR leaks will stem the momentum and the writing on the wall will continue to stress RR into near anorexia. JB can’t settle and BL/RR must settle and lie to claim a yummy victory for all women who text about their anus to their harassers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The fact that Slate and the other actress hasn’t come out to say the HR complaints are false makes me wonder if they are real.

Hm, makes sense to you I guess.

[Anonymous]

Wait now we want people to address Reddit and YouTube rumors? Maybe we can get them to do a q&a with this dcum thread too
.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wait now we want people to address Reddit and YouTube rumors? Maybe we can get them to do a q&a with this dcum thread too
.

lol! The insanity on this last page!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I think this is actually good for folks on this thread to see. Even Candace Owens implicitly acknowledges that this is Hollywood taking RR/BL’s side. She wouldn’t be mad/wouldn’t need to make this tweet if this wasn’t a good appearance for them. You can think it was in bad taste or whatever, but the people trying to claim this doesn’t amount to a Hollywood blessing are bonkers.

Well considering that she routinely calls out Hollywood as “demonic,” I wouldn’t say that she’s conceding that this is GOOD for him/them. I just think it reinforces her viewpoint that they are frequently aligned with lifting up and supporting evil causes.

+1
Definitely amounts to a “Hollywood blessing” but Hollywood blessed Weinstein for years! And years. And years. And they all knew.

Don’t see this as HWood blessing. Someone invited them, but clearly others were uncomfortable when they saw them there.

I looked at it as as sort of a “here is a little support, but after this you are on your own (good luck in digging out from under this) type of statement from SNL. Not a “we are behind you 100 percent” statement at all.

They do it for many actors,etc, that encounter some hard times or trouble. Never 100% support, but a “free meal” when needed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wait now we want people to address Reddit and YouTube rumors? Maybe we can get them to do a q&a with this dcum thread too
.

Lololololol

[Anonymous]

Can we get back on track here. There are protocols if actresses go and file an HR complaint as it is said that Isabel and Jenny did. They file a complaint with SAG, production is shut down and there is an investigation. I’m not hearing that there is any of that.

It also seems like Isabel and Jenny went to Sony early in the film to file and they responded? Yet months later when Blake tried to go to Sony they said they were merely the distributor and had no role. So Sony took up Isabell and Jenny ‘s complaints early on but later when the star came to them, they said sorry I can’t help? Things are not adding up.

The fact it remains even if Blake was SH, she did not follow protocol, instead she almost gleefully decided to use this as extortion to take over the film. This is not how sexual harassment should be handled. Ryan and Blake have turned it into a joke and a bit and a way to get more money and control of the film. Sorry, not buying any of this new twist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wait now we want people to address Reddit and YouTube rumors? Maybe we can get them to do a q&a with this dcum thread too
.

I agree the source is highly dubious, but the fact that those "documents" are floating around makes me thing the rumor will have legs and everyone will have to address it.

Apparently it was pro-JB "creators" who started the rumor? Which, if true, is bad for JB? It smells super fishy but in a way I can't make sense of.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wait now we want people to address Reddit and YouTube rumors? Maybe we can get them to do a q&a with this dcum thread too
.

I agree the source is highly dubious, but the fact that those "documents" are floating around makes me thing the rumor will have legs and everyone will have to address it.

Apparently it was pro-JB "creators" who started the rumor? Which, if true, is bad for JB? It smells super fishy but in a way I can't make sense of.

Floating around where? Reddit? What a joke.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is not how you respond when your wife has allegedly been SH. Shameful.

I totally agree. So gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wait now we want people to address Reddit and YouTube rumors? Maybe we can get them to do a q&a with this dcum thread too
.

I agree the source is highly dubious, but the fact that those "documents" are floating around makes me thing the rumor will have legs and everyone will have to address it.

Apparently it was pro-JB "creators" who started the rumor? Which, if true, is bad for JB? It smells super fishy but in a way I can't make sense of.

Wait until the complaint is updated. Trying to figure out why randoms on the internet do anything is crazy