Andy Ngo, notorious racial agitator, caught in Portland protest

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know.... it's funny.
You want to condemn Ngo for not condemning the Proud Boys or Patriot Prayer.
Yet, we have example after example of the main stream media reporters excusing away the violence that occurred during the summer of 2020.
They were "mostly peaceful protests," until they weren't. The looters were just seeking reparations. The people burning down businesses were just causing property damage.
Nothing to see here......

Your post is just really, really sad. There’s nothing funny about the fact that the Proud Boys and Boogaloo Bois were the ones to commit the violence during all the protests last summer. That’s the whole point of why Ngo is pointless and not a journalist. He is a provocateur. He is part of the criminal class; it serves his purpose and that of all the far right wing lunatics for peaceful protests to turn violent and so they turn them violent. People have posted links upthread with proof.

Get it through your head: Ngo is the problem.

Liberal here. PBs and BBs certainly weren’t the only ones who caused violence. I know that they did, and even murdered a cop, but let’s not try to pretend like they did all of it. There’s plenty of blame to go around. Anarchists have always had questionable methods, including violence and destruction.

When did a PB or BB murder a cop! I didn’t know that?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_boogaloo_killings

The killer is a Hispanic man. Do the proud boys and bb accept minority people like Hispanics into their groups?

What rock did you crawl rom under Wink? The Chairman of the Proud Boys is Hispanic.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enrique_Tarrio

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know.... it's funny.
You want to condemn Ngo for not condemning the Proud Boys or Patriot Prayer.
Yet, we have example after example of the main stream media reporters excusing away the violence that occurred during the summer of 2020.
They were "mostly peaceful protests," until they weren't. The looters were just seeking reparations. The people burning down businesses were just causing property damage.
Nothing to see here......

Your post is just really, really sad. There’s nothing funny about the fact that the Proud Boys and Boogaloo Bois were the ones to commit the violence during all the protests last summer. That’s the whole point of why Ngo is pointless and not a journalist. He is a provocateur. He is part of the criminal class; it serves his purpose and that of all the far right wing lunatics for peaceful protests to turn violent and so they turn them violent. People have posted links upthread with proof.

Get it through your head: Ngo is the problem.

Liberal here. PBs and BBs certainly weren’t the only ones who caused violence. I know that they did, and even murdered a cop, but let’s not try to pretend like they did all of it. There’s plenty of blame to go around. Anarchists have always had questionable methods, including violence and destruction.

When did a PB or BB murder a cop! I didn’t know that?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_boogaloo_killings

The killer is a Hispanic man. Do the proud boys and bb accept minority people like Hispanics into their groups?

Some sects do accept non-whites.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is it possible that everyone who doesn’t buy NGo’s glass narrative is an antifa sympathizer?

Are you one of the morons who calls anyone you disagree with a “Trump supporter”? 🤔

No, no I’m not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know.... it's funny.
You want to condemn Ngo for not condemning the Proud Boys or Patriot Prayer.
Yet, we have example after example of the main stream media reporters excusing away the violence that occurred during the summer of 2020.
They were "mostly peaceful protests," until they weren't. The looters were just seeking reparations. The people burning down businesses were just causing property damage.
Nothing to see here......

Your post is just really, really sad. There’s nothing funny about the fact that the Proud Boys and Boogaloo Bois were the ones to commit the violence during all the protests last summer. That’s the whole point of why Ngo is pointless and not a journalist. He is a provocateur. He is part of the criminal class; it serves his purpose and that of all the far right wing lunatics for peaceful protests to turn violent and so they turn them violent. People have posted links upthread with proof.

Get it through your head: Ngo is the problem.

Liberal here. PBs and BBs certainly weren’t the only ones who caused violence. I know that they did, and even murdered a cop, but let’s not try to pretend like they did all of it. There’s plenty of blame to go around. Anarchists have always had questionable methods, including violence and destruction.

When did a PB or BB murder a cop! I didn’t know that?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_boogaloo_killings

The killer is a Hispanic man. Do the proud boys and bb accept minority people like Hispanics into their groups?

What rock did you crawl rom under Wink? The Chairman of the Proud Boys is Hispanic.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enrique_Tarrio

Enrique chairman.

He's a tool who cares more about his makeup and posing and has been disavowed by the other proud butts. He's a joke. Chairman. What a fing funny term.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How is it possible that everyone who doesn’t buy NGo’s glass narrative is an antifa sympathizer?

The same way that everyone who thinks it's okay for Ngo to take pictures at a public event is a right wing lunatic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know.... it's funny.
You want to condemn Ngo for not condemning the Proud Boys or Patriot Prayer.
Yet, we have example after example of the main stream media reporters excusing away the violence that occurred during the summer of 2020.
They were "mostly peaceful protests," until they weren't. The looters were just seeking reparations. The people burning down businesses were just causing property damage.
Nothing to see here......

Your post is just really, really sad. There’s nothing funny about the fact that the Proud Boys and Boogaloo Bois were the ones to commit the violence during all the protests last summer. That’s the whole point of why Ngo is pointless and not a journalist. He is a provocateur. He is part of the criminal class; it serves his purpose and that of all the far right wing lunatics for peaceful protests to turn violent and so they turn them violent. People have posted links upthread with proof.

Get it through your head: Ngo is the problem.

Liberal here. PBs and BBs certainly weren’t the only ones who caused violence. I know that they did, and even murdered a cop, but let’s not try to pretend like they did all of it. There’s plenty of blame to go around. Anarchists have always had questionable methods, including violence and destruction.

When did a PB or BB murder a cop! I didn’t know that?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_boogaloo_killings

The killer is a Hispanic man. Do the proud boys and bb accept minority people like Hispanics into their groups?

What rock did you crawl rom under Wink? The Chairman of the Proud Boys is Hispanic.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enrique_Tarrio

Enrique chairman.

He's a tool who cares more about his makeup and posing and has been disavowed by the other proud butts. He's a joke. Chairman. What a fing funny term.

They are all tools. The point is that the Proud Boys have Hispanic members. I do believe the Proud Boys evolved from purely a racist organization to a an organization full of misogynist, maybe that's when the Enriques were allowed to join. The original founder has been in the news screaming about taking back the realm and returning PB to its original purpose, and that does not include the Enriques

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is it possible that everyone who doesn’t buy NGo’s glass narrative is an antifa sympathizer?

The same way that everyone who thinks it's okay for Ngo to take pictures at a public event is a right wing lunatic.

+100

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is it possible that everyone who doesn’t buy NGo’s glass narrative is an antifa sympathizer?

The same way that everyone who thinks it's okay for Ngo to take pictures at a public event is a right wing lunatic.

+100

He’s not just taking pictures. He’s selling a narrative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is it possible that everyone who doesn’t buy NGo’s glass narrative is an antifa sympathizer?

The same way that everyone who thinks it's okay for Ngo to take pictures at a public event is a right wing lunatic.

+100

He’s not just taking pictures. He’s selling a narrative.

The videos and pictures speak for themselves.
Do you deny that there are a number of anarchists/antifa causing destruction in Portland nearly every night for the past year?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is it possible that everyone who doesn’t buy NGo’s glass narrative is an antifa sympathizer?

The same way that everyone who thinks it's okay for Ngo to take pictures at a public event is a right wing lunatic.

+100

He’s not just taking pictures. He’s selling a narrative.

The videos and pictures speak for themselves.
Do you deny that there are a number of anarchists/antifa causing destruction in Portland nearly every night for the past year?

I’m not denying that there are anarchists causing trouble, and breaking the law. I’m denying that antifa is trying to take over the country. I am denying Andy Ngo’s victim narrative. Plenty of real journalists were injured by the police last year. Did Ngo cover any of that? Seems counter to his mission of uncovering antifa.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is it possible that everyone who doesn’t buy NGo’s glass narrative is an antifa sympathizer?

The same way that everyone who thinks it's okay for Ngo to take pictures at a public event is a right wing lunatic.

+100

He’s not just taking pictures. He’s selling a narrative.

The videos and pictures speak for themselves.
Do you deny that there are a number of anarchists/antifa causing destruction in Portland nearly every night for the past year?

It's a few dozen anarchist idiots in the PNW who have been pulling this bullshit for years, some of us are old enough to remember them rioting in the streets of Seattle over WTO back in the 1990s. Same "movement." Yet Andy Ngo has made it seem like every night in Portland there are buildings being burned to the ground and thousands of businesses destroyed and Ngo reports in grossly exaggerated fashion trying to portray it as if it were the single biggest existential threat and that it will destroy America which it isn't and won't. It's mostly sporadic weekend warrior bullshit and most of it has been confined to a 2 block radius, life in the rest of Portland has been going on just fine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is it possible that everyone who doesn’t buy NGo’s glass narrative is an antifa sympathizer?

The same way that everyone who thinks it's okay for Ngo to take pictures at a public event is a right wing lunatic.

+100

He’s not just taking pictures. He’s selling a narrative.

The videos and pictures speak for themselves.
Do you deny that there are a number of anarchists/antifa causing destruction in Portland nearly every night for the past year?

I’m not denying that there are anarchists causing trouble, and breaking the law. I’m denying that antifa is trying to take over the country. I am denying Andy Ngo’s victim narrative. Plenty of real journalists were injured by the police last year. Did Ngo cover any of that? Seems counter to his mission of uncovering antifa.

Not to mention why only focus on Antifa? Why not Patriot Prayer or Proud Boys or other extremist groups who've engaged in street violence, vandalism and destruction?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is it possible that everyone who doesn’t buy NGo’s glass narrative is an antifa sympathizer?

The same way that everyone who thinks it's okay for Ngo to take pictures at a public event is a right wing lunatic.

+100

He’s not just taking pictures. He’s selling a narrative.

Everyone in the world today is "selling a narrative" even(or especially) people who say they aren't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is it possible that everyone who doesn’t buy NGo’s glass narrative is an antifa sympathizer?

The same way that everyone who thinks it's okay for Ngo to take pictures at a public event is a right wing lunatic.

+100

He’s not just taking pictures. He’s selling a narrative.

The videos and pictures speak for themselves.
Do you deny that there are a number of anarchists/antifa causing destruction in Portland nearly every night for the past year?

It's a few dozen anarchist idiots in the PNW who have been pulling this bullshit for years, some of us are old enough to remember them rioting in the streets of Seattle over WTO back in the 1990s. Same "movement." Yet Andy Ngo has made it seem like every night in Portland there are buildings being burned to the ground and thousands of businesses destroyed and Ngo reports in grossly exaggerated fashion trying to portray it as if it were the single biggest existential threat and that it will destroy America which it isn't and won't. It's mostly sporadic weekend warrior bullshit and most of it has been confined to a 2 block radius, life in the rest of Portland has been going on just fine.

So Andy Ngo is the single biggest existential threat in America, do I have that right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is it possible that everyone who doesn’t buy NGo’s glass narrative is an antifa sympathizer?

The same way that everyone who thinks it's okay for Ngo to take pictures at a public event is a right wing lunatic.

+100

He’s not just taking pictures. He’s selling a narrative.

The videos and pictures speak for themselves.
Do you deny that there are a number of anarchists/antifa causing destruction in Portland nearly every night for the past year?

I’m not denying that there are anarchists causing trouble, and breaking the law. I’m denying that antifa is trying to take over the country. I am denying Andy Ngo’s victim narrative. Plenty of real journalists were injured by the police last year. Did Ngo cover any of that? Seems counter to his mission of uncovering antifa.

Not to mention why only focus on Antifa? Why not Patriot Prayer or Proud Boys or other extremist groups who've engaged in street violence, vandalism and destruction?

Oh, poor Antifa.