Protesters outside of Tucker Carlson's house

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tucker is not on his show right now, but calling in (probably from home).

This really needs to be stopped. We cannot have the far-left extremists behaving this way.

The far right extremists sent bombs and shot up a place of worship. I don’t hear anything you say until you stop the actual murderers on your side.

Dumb false equivalence. No one is condoning the guy who mailed bombs. But a significant percentage of the Left supports harassment against Tucker and his family at their home.

To borrow from others on this thread, please provide a cite for the "significant percentage of the Left".

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm giving some very serious thought to organizing a similar protest outside Jeff Steele's home.

Although I will offer Jeff an absolute assurance that his vehicles will not be damaged, his door frame will not be broken, and we will respect his property.

But we absolutely WILL show up in the middle of the night and raise hell with a bullhorn for a few hours.


Would this be ok with the libs on the board?

Or would this be intimidation and terrorism?

Come any time. I'll provide donuts (though I won't be able to eat any myself as they aren't on my diet).

We'll serve you crudités. Maybe you'll decide that we can agree to sometimes disagree, and you won't jump to delete me when I touch that nerve.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tucker is not on his show right now, but calling in (probably from home).

This really needs to be stopped. We cannot have the far-left extremists behaving this way.

The far right extremists sent bombs and shot up a place of worship. I don’t hear anything you say until you stop the actual murderers on your side.

Dumb false equivalence. No one is condoning the guy who mailed bombs. But a significant percentage of the Left supports harassment against Tucker and his family at their home.

To borrow from others on this thread, please provide a cite for the "significant percentage of the Left".

Agree with PP! Show us the money (or rather an actual percentage of the left?!) I feel like your sample is what you chose to read into the 5 liberal posters here on DCUM.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Christine Blasey Ford is still being threatened and harassed, can’t return home, can’t return to work. I hope OP is concerned about that too.

Liar.

https://www.npr.org/2018/11/08/665407589/kavanaugh-accuser-christine-blasey-ford-continues-receiving-threats-lawyers-say

not lying...why would you reflexively post "liar" unless you were either lazy, and idiot or a troll?

I'm not impressed with what her lawyers have to say. Are you?

Where's the list of the "threats"?
Surely they've been reported and investigated, no?
And the perps charged?

You gullible fool.

Your retort is so disturbing. What have her lawyers possibly done that would have you dismiss them as unimpressive? One of her lawyers was a federal prosecutor in the SDNY, an associate counsel on Iran-Contra, and an IG at DOJ.

Where's the evidence of all those threats?
Surely there's multiple police reports, no?
Can't go back to her professor job?
Please. She's too busy remodeling her beach house with that FAT GoFundMe account. You gullible fools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because Tucker has never made claims or encouraged protestors/ conspiracy theorists/ angry online crazies to threaten liberal groups. He is not innocent whatsoever. What goes around comes around and I have no sympathy for people who dish it out but can’t take it no matter what their politics are.

So you're fine with terrorizing children, as long as they're conservatives' children?

Tucker’s kids aren’t really children - all are older than 15. Plus, they aren’t even home. They are away at boarding school(s) and college(s).

Ok, then. It's OK to terrorize conservatives' children as long as they are at least 16? Do you have a limit on the other end? OK to terrorize elderly as long as they are under 85?

Why is it acceptable to terrorize anyone?

No one on this thread has said this is “ok.”

Some of us don’t really care, because Tucker is sort of vile. But we welcome police investigating and enforcing the law in this case.

Wrong. Plenty of you have shown your true colors and very much said this is "ok." As if there was ever any doubt.

Where? You say it’s in the thread, go ahead and post a quote.

Do your own dirty work. Start on page one of this thread and keep going. You people are disgusting.

Liar. No one said it was "ok". DP.

I should report you for calling me a liar, but instead I'll just prove you wrong. Have a great day and try to stop lying and blaming others for your own issues. This was just through page 5:

That’s not how it works. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

This is what happens when you sell your soul as a propagandist. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

It seems just deserts for Carlson after profiting by spreading many half-truths and hate.

Because Tucker has never made claims or encouraged protestors/ conspiracy theorists/ angry online crazies to threaten liberal groups. He is not innocent whatsoever. What goes around comes around and I have no sympathy for people who dish it out but can’t take it no matter what their politics are.

He expects to be treated with the courtesy he routinely denies others. His actions have consequences.

That's my take as well. He encourages violent behavior and feeds hate through the spread of half-truths. I have little sympathy for him.

The country is in a constitutional crisis, I can’t really spare concern for one dipshit getting his comeuppance from a bunch of other dipshits.

Terrorizing? LOL.

But to answer your question, I would not be one out there. And I don't like it. But, he invited it. His wife should be taking him to task for putting their family in the spotlight with his BS, conspiracy theories, accusations, and incivility. Once he does that, he would have a shred of sympathy from me. As it is, he doesn't.

Thank you.
Libs are peddling a propaganda machine here.

+100

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
This is what happens when you sell your soul as a propagandist. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

It seems just deserts for Carlson after profiting by spreading many half-truths and hate.

Because Tucker has never made claims or encouraged protestors/ conspiracy theorists/ angry online crazies to threaten liberal groups. He is not innocent whatsoever. What goes around comes around and I have no sympathy for people who dish it out but can’t take it no matter what their politics are.

He expects to be treated with the courtesy he routinely denies others. His actions have consequences.

That's my take as well. He encourages violent behavior and feeds hate through the spread of half-truths. I have little sympathy for him.

The country is in a constitutional crisis, I can’t really spare concern for one dipshit getting his comeuppance from a bunch of other dipshits.

Terrorizing? LOL.

But to answer your question, I would not be one out there. And I don't like it. But, he invited it. His wife should be taking him to task for putting their family in the spotlight with his BS, conspiracy theories, accusations, and incivility. Once he does that, he would have a shred of sympathy from me. As it is, he doesn't.

Exactly. Thank you!

Bottom line - these people are exercising their first amendment rights and it is a direct consequence of Carlson's own actions for which he needs to take personal responsibility.

WOW. So here we have a prime example of a liberal saying it's OK what these jackasses did. Everyone, take note.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because Tucker has never made claims or encouraged protestors/ conspiracy theorists/ angry online crazies to threaten liberal groups. He is not innocent whatsoever. What goes around comes around and I have no sympathy for people who dish it out but can’t take it no matter what their politics are.

So you're fine with terrorizing children, as long as they're conservatives' children?

Tucker’s kids aren’t really children - all are older than 15. Plus, they aren’t even home. They are away at boarding school(s) and college(s).

Ok, then. It's OK to terrorize conservatives' children as long as they are at least 16? Do you have a limit on the other end? OK to terrorize elderly as long as they are under 85?

Why is it acceptable to terrorize anyone?

No one on this thread has said this is “ok.”

Some of us don’t really care, because Tucker is sort of vile. But we welcome police investigating and enforcing the law in this case.

Wrong. Plenty of you have shown your true colors and very much said this is "ok." As if there was ever any doubt.

Where? You say it’s in the thread, go ahead and post a quote.

Do your own dirty work. Start on page one of this thread and keep going. You people are disgusting.

Liar. No one said it was "ok". DP.

I should report you for calling me a liar, but instead I'll just prove you wrong. Have a great day and try to stop lying and blaming others for your own issues. This was just through page 5:

That’s not how it works. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

This is what happens when you sell your soul as a propagandist. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

It seems just deserts for Carlson after profiting by spreading many half-truths and hate.

Because Tucker has never made claims or encouraged protestors/ conspiracy theorists/ angry online crazies to threaten liberal groups. He is not innocent whatsoever. What goes around comes around and I have no sympathy for people who dish it out but can’t take it no matter what their politics are.

He expects to be treated with the courtesy he routinely denies others. His actions have consequences.

That's my take as well. He encourages violent behavior and feeds hate through the spread of half-truths. I have little sympathy for him.

The country is in a constitutional crisis, I can’t really spare concern for one dipshit getting his comeuppance from a bunch of other dipshits.

Terrorizing? LOL.

But to answer your question, I would not be one out there. And I don't like it. But, he invited it. His wife should be taking him to task for putting their family in the spotlight with his BS, conspiracy theories, accusations, and incivility. Once he does that, he would have a shred of sympathy from me. As it is, he doesn't.

All of those comments just said that they aren't surprised that it happened because TC is such a sh1thead. And they don't really care. That doesn't mean they condone violence. Not that there was any actual violence in this situation...

As it stands, you are still a liar.

There are no words for what a moron you are. Just keep twisting words around and hope they'll stick! You and your liberal buddies see nothing wrong with what this mob did at Carlson's house. Thus, YOU ARE OK WITH IT. Thanks for showing your true colors, yet again. And speaking of liar...

[Anonymous]

Let's see, cracked his door frame, vandalized his driveway and car with spray paint, and said "we know where you sleep at night".

[Anonymous]

If only you guys got so worked up over kids in school being massacred by a crazed gunman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because Tucker has never made claims or encouraged protestors/ conspiracy theorists/ angry online crazies to threaten liberal groups. He is not innocent whatsoever. What goes around comes around and I have no sympathy for people who dish it out but can’t take it no matter what their politics are.

So you're fine with terrorizing children, as long as they're conservatives' children?

Tucker’s kids aren’t really children - all are older than 15. Plus, they aren’t even home. They are away at boarding school(s) and college(s).

Ok, then. It's OK to terrorize conservatives' children as long as they are at least 16? Do you have a limit on the other end? OK to terrorize elderly as long as they are under 85?

Why is it acceptable to terrorize anyone?

No one on this thread has said this is “ok.”

Some of us don’t really care, because Tucker is sort of vile. But we welcome police investigating and enforcing the law in this case.

Wrong. Plenty of you have shown your true colors and very much said this is "ok." As if there was ever any doubt.

Where? You say it’s in the thread, go ahead and post a quote.

Do your own dirty work. Start on page one of this thread and keep going. You people are disgusting.

Liar. No one said it was "ok". DP.

I should report you for calling me a liar, but instead I'll just prove you wrong. Have a great day and try to stop lying and blaming others for your own issues. This was just through page 5:

That’s not how it works. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

This is what happens when you sell your soul as a propagandist. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

It seems just deserts for Carlson after profiting by spreading many half-truths and hate.

Because Tucker has never made claims or encouraged protestors/ conspiracy theorists/ angry online crazies to threaten liberal groups. He is not innocent whatsoever. What goes around comes around and I have no sympathy for people who dish it out but can’t take it no matter what their politics are.

He expects to be treated with the courtesy he routinely denies others. His actions have consequences.

That's my take as well. He encourages violent behavior and feeds hate through the spread of half-truths. I have little sympathy for him.

The country is in a constitutional crisis, I can’t really spare concern for one dipshit getting his comeuppance from a bunch of other dipshits.

Terrorizing? LOL.

But to answer your question, I would not be one out there. And I don't like it. But, he invited it. His wife should be taking him to task for putting their family in the spotlight with his BS, conspiracy theories, accusations, and incivility. Once he does that, he would have a shred of sympathy from me. As it is, he doesn't.

All of those comments just said that they aren't surprised that it happened because TC is such a sh1thead. And they don't really care. That doesn't mean they condone violence. Not that there was any actual violence in this situation...

As it stands, you are still a liar.

There are no words for what a moron you are. Just keep twisting words around and hope they'll stick! You and your liberal buddies see nothing wrong with what this mob did at Carlson's house. Thus, YOU ARE OK WITH IT. Thanks for showing your true colors, yet again. And speaking of liar...

Indifference is not approval. You dumb fock.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Actions have consequences. He got what he deserved.

What actions? Words on a tv oped?

Who decides he “got what he deserved?”

No law and order here folks, Libs are off the chain!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actions have consequences. He got what he deserved.

What actions? Words on a tv oped?

Who decides he “got what he deserved?”

No law and order here folks, Libs are off the chain!

DP. Ignore PP! We’ve provided numerous links on this enormous thread about some stupid news bro getting harassed and suffering minor vandalism from protestors.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tucker is not on his show right now, but calling in (probably from home).

This really needs to be stopped. We cannot have the far-left extremists behaving this way.

The far right extremists sent bombs and shot up a place of worship. I don’t hear anything you say until you stop the actual murderers on your side.

Why can't we all agree that it isn't right on either side?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Terrible.
I know this is a small minority of activists but their behavior should be called out. People should not be accosted in restaurants, in their homes or when they are “off the clock”

That’s not how it works. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

Above is just one of the many evil posts by a Liberal.
Shame on you all!

For you, 9:55, you liar.

DP. 9:55 spoke the truth.

There's such a pattern here. When libs can't accept the truth, they say "liar."

(I was called a liar for complaining that leftists marched through my neighborhood at 9 pm screaming "F borders".)

You expect us to hear the voices in your head?

See what I mean? The leftists refuse to admit how obnoxious they are, so they say liar when their behavior is pointed out to them.

Yep. It’s like when they tell posters they disagree with to “STFU.” So easy to tell when they have no rational argument or rebuttal. They just call you a liar, tell you to STFU, and stomp away like toddlers. Kind of amusing, in a pathetic way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You Liberals still can't find one quote that makes Tucker your frightful boogeyman. Your demons will eat you up.

An article has been linked. Go read it.

Your illeteracy will eat you up.

Bahahahahaaha!!