On the chopping block: AAP Centers

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Board to make these decisions. It's representative democracy in action. Also qualified kids have a right under VA law to gifted services. A local community cannot vote to do away with that right-- which would be the effect in many base school of closing centers. Also, does this really make sense: I want FCPS to be required to offer/ teach Swahili (or creationism or swimming or allow for language immersion in every school) there should be a ballot initiate. Welcome the to the 70 page local ballot. Or, as a previous poster said: election law (and I'd add constitutional law).


VA is under no obligation to provide center schools. Qualified students can and should be receiving gifted services in their base schools. No other county in VA provides center schools, nor should they have to.


Gifted services includes ". . .gifted education service options from kindergarten through twelfth grade are offered continuously and sequentially, with instructional time during the school day and week to (i) work with their age-level peers, (ii) work with their intellectual and academic peers, (iii) work independently, and (iv) foster intellectual and academic growth of gifted students." - 8VAC20-40-60

http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+reg+8VAC20-40-60

One Center-eligible child in a grade at a base school receiving gifted services is not working "with their intellectual and academic peers" -- but would be at a Center.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can we all just agree that we hate having AAP Centers?


I can certainly agree with this. They create far too many issues, resentment, and divisiveness.


I can certainly disagree with this as my student does not have a peer group at the base school. (He was subjected to frequent bullying, among other things.)
so a child who just misses the cut off for eligibility in your school has to stay and get bullied? You bought your house around certain school boundaries. But your kid gets the option to leave. Hmmm


Exactly. Complete inequity.


I agree. Complete inequity for the one or two students at the base school who are Center eligible. They should be at a Center.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can we all just agree that we hate having AAP Centers?


I can certainly agree with this. They create far too many issues, resentment, and divisiveness.


I can certainly disagree with this as my student does not have a peer group at the base school. (He was subjected to frequent bullying, among other things.)
so a child who just misses the cut off for eligibility in your school has to stay and get bullied? You bought your house around certain school boundaries. But your kid gets the option to leave. Hmmm


It sucks that a child just misses the cut off, but exactly. Her child qualified for a special program. Part of the reason he qualified for the program is a learning style that has statistically high likelihood of being 2e, which is a group of kids that has a very high likelihood of being bullied. And her child stayed in boundary (the AAP boundary) as the school boundary is defined in the FCPS Boundary locator. Google it and plug your address in there. It will spit out 2 boundaries: one AAP, one not. Both are real boundaries, depending on your child's program. And you don't ditch a program almost everyone agrees is needed at some level (whether that is top .5%, 1%, 2%, whatever) because a small number of kids are misidentified or just miss the cut off. And there are frequent complaints from Gen Ed that FCPS overidentifies kids, and should be less willing to take that borderline kid.

Some posters with GE kids on this thread have made really good points that have changed the way I think about the Center school structure. I would note lunate centers, but I see where They can be unnecessary, or even counterproductive in some cases. But a few posters (or maybe even one vocal poster) is so mean and seem to have so little compassion for AAP kids, some of whose parents describe bullying, social isolation, a genuine academic inability to function in a Gen Ed setting and struggles with 2e. And also has so little of actual substance to say. That poster (because I'd like to think it's just one) hurts people raising valid issues by turning open minded AAP parents off. And yes, that person I would characterize as a troll. Because they are not on this board to discuss a real issue in our schools. They only want to belittle others (kids!), presumably to make themselves feel better.


I think a lot of the anger directed toward the entire AAP situation can be summed up in this way: AAP kids are given a choice of schools that GE kids are not. The GE child who is bullied at his/her base school is stuck there unless the family can fulfill one of the very specific criteria for transferring. The bullied AAP kid, on the other hand, is able to leave for a center school, with no hoops to jump through as the GE student must.

Another example is the family who moves into a "lesser" school boundary, but can send their AAP child to a better school simply because s/he gets into AAP. Meanwhile, the GE kids at this base school have no such option for leaving.

Can you and others possibly see the incredible inequities the families of GE children (not to mention these kids themselves) see every day? If the situations were reversed, and your child was stuck unhappily at one school, but a large group of his/her peers were able to opt for another school - you'd be furious and speaking up about it too. The system is clearly sending a message to our General Ed kids - they are second class citizens within FCPS.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can we all just agree that we hate having AAP Centers?


I can certainly agree with this. They create far too many issues, resentment, and divisiveness.


I can certainly disagree with this as my student does not have a peer group at the base school. (He was subjected to frequent bullying, among other things.)
so a child who just misses the cut off for eligibility in your school has to stay and get bullied? You bought your house around certain school boundaries. But your kid gets the option to leave. Hmmm


Exactly. Complete inequity.


I agree. Complete inequity for the one or two students at the base school who are Center eligible. They should be at a Center.


So one or two (or even a handful) of kids at each base school should dictate how and where the rest of the kids in FCPS go to school? No.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can we all just agree that we hate having AAP Centers?


I can certainly agree with this. They create far too many issues, resentment, and divisiveness.


I can certainly disagree with this as my student does not have a peer group at the base school. (He was subjected to frequent bullying, among other things.)
so a child who just misses the cut off for eligibility in your school has to stay and get bullied? You bought your house around certain school boundaries. But your kid gets the option to leave. Hmmm


Exactly. Complete inequity.


I agree. Complete inequity for the one or two students at the base school who are Center eligible. They should be at a Center.


So one or two (or even a handful) of kids at each base school should dictate how and where the rest of the kids in FCPS go to school? No.


What works in one part of the county does not necessarily work in another part of the county.

The services a child receives should not be dependent on zip code.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can we all just agree that we hate having AAP Centers?


I can certainly agree with this. They create far too many issues, resentment, and divisiveness.


I can certainly disagree with this as my student does not have a peer group at the base school. (He was subjected to frequent bullying, among other things.)
so a child who just misses the cut off for eligibility in your school has to stay and get bullied? You bought your house around certain school boundaries. But your kid gets the option to leave. Hmmm


It sucks that a child just misses the cut off, but exactly. Her child qualified for a special program. Part of the reason he qualified for the program is a learning style that has statistically high likelihood of being 2e, which is a group of kids that has a very high likelihood of being bullied. And her child stayed in boundary (the AAP boundary) as the school boundary is defined in the FCPS Boundary locator. Google it and plug your address in there. It will spit out 2 boundaries: one AAP, one not. Both are real boundaries, depending on your child's program. And you don't ditch a program almost everyone agrees is needed at some level (whether that is top .5%, 1%, 2%, whatever) because a small number of kids are misidentified or just miss the cut off. And there are frequent complaints from Gen Ed that FCPS overidentifies kids, and should be less willing to take that borderline kid.

Some posters with GE kids on this thread have made really good points that have changed the way I think about the Center school structure. I would note lunate centers, but I see where They can be unnecessary, or even counterproductive in some cases. But a few posters (or maybe even one vocal poster) is so mean and seem to have so little compassion for AAP kids, some of whose parents describe bullying, social isolation, a genuine academic inability to function in a Gen Ed setting and struggles with 2e. And also has so little of actual substance to say. That poster (because I'd like to think it's just one) hurts people raising valid issues by turning open minded AAP parents off. And yes, that person I would characterize as a troll. Because they are not on this board to discuss a real issue in our schools. They only want to belittle others (kids!), presumably to make themselves feel better.


I think a lot of the anger directed toward the entire AAP situation can be summed up in this way: AAP kids are given a choice of schools that GE kids are not. The GE child who is bullied at his/her base school is stuck there unless the family can fulfill one of the very specific criteria for transferring. The bullied AAP kid, on the other hand, is able to leave for a center school, with no hoops to jump through as the GE student must.

Another example is the family who moves into a "lesser" school boundary, but can send their AAP child to a better school simply because s/he gets into AAP. Meanwhile, the GE kids at this base school have no such option for leaving.

Can you and others possibly see the incredible inequities the families of GE children (not to mention these kids themselves) see every day? If the situations were reversed, and your child was stuck unhappily at one school, but a large group of his/her peers were able to opt for another school - you'd be furious and speaking up about it too. The system is clearly sending a message to our General Ed kids - they are second class citizens within FCPS.


My child does not have a large group of his peers going to another school.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can we all just agree that we hate having AAP Centers?


I can certainly agree with this. They create far too many issues, resentment, and divisiveness.


I can certainly disagree with this as my student does not have a peer group at the base school. (He was subjected to frequent bullying, among other things.)
so a child who just misses the cut off for eligibility in your school has to stay and get bullied? You bought your house around certain school boundaries. But your kid gets the option to leave. Hmmm


Exactly. Complete inequity.


I agree. Complete inequity for the one or two students at the base school who are Center eligible. They should be at a Center.


So one or two (or even a handful) of kids at each base school should dictate how and where the rest of the kids in FCPS go to school? No.


What works in one part of the county does not necessarily work in another part of the county.

The services a child receives should not be dependent on zip code.


No one is saying that it should be (dependent on zip code). However, if the services a child needs can be provided at his base school, then those are the services he should receive. And I think most people would admit that the vast majority of AAP kids don't "need" anything that Gen Ed kids wouldn't also need.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can we all just agree that we hate having AAP Centers?


I can certainly agree with this. They create far too many issues, resentment, and divisiveness.


I can certainly disagree with this as my student does not have a peer group at the base school. (He was subjected to frequent bullying, among other things.)
so a child who just misses the cut off for eligibility in your school has to stay and get bullied? You bought your house around certain school boundaries. But your kid gets the option to leave. Hmmm


Exactly. Complete inequity.


I agree. Complete inequity for the one or two students at the base school who are Center eligible. They should be at a Center.


So one or two (or even a handful) of kids at each base school should dictate how and where the rest of the kids in FCPS go to school? No.


What works in one part of the county does not necessarily work in another part of the county.

The services a child receives should not be dependent on zip code.


No one is saying that it should be (dependent on zip code). However, if the services a child needs can be provided at his base school, then those are the services he should receive. And I think most people would admit that the vast majority of AAP kids don't "need" anything that Gen Ed kids wouldn't also need.


I will not speak for what other children need to receive or do receive for services. I will, however, speak for my child and do my best to advocate for his needs. He needs gifted services and the services he received at his base school for Level II were "ok" but the services he receives now at the Center school seem to be a much better fit. The staff and teachers also are addressing his needs as outlined in his IEP and his 504 Plan, something we really struggled with at the base school.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can we all just agree that we hate having AAP Centers?


I can certainly agree with this. They create far too many issues, resentment, and divisiveness.


I can certainly disagree with this as my student does not have a peer group at the base school. (He was subjected to frequent bullying, among other things.)
so a child who just misses the cut off for eligibility in your school has to stay and get bullied? You bought your house around certain school boundaries. But your kid gets the option to leave. Hmmm


It sucks that a child just misses the cut off, but exactly. Her child qualified for a special program. Part of the reason he qualified for the program is a learning style that has statistically high likelihood of being 2e, which is a group of kids that has a very high likelihood of being bullied. And her child stayed in boundary (the AAP boundary) as the school boundary is defined in the FCPS Boundary locator. Google it and plug your address in there. It will spit out 2 boundaries: one AAP, one not. Both are real boundaries, depending on your child's program. And you don't ditch a program almost everyone agrees is needed at some level (whether that is top .5%, 1%, 2%, whatever) because a small number of kids are misidentified or just miss the cut off. And there are frequent complaints from Gen Ed that FCPS overidentifies kids, and should be less willing to take that borderline kid.

Some posters with GE kids on this thread have made really good points that have changed the way I think about the Center school structure. I would note lunate centers, but I see where They can be unnecessary, or even counterproductive in some cases. But a few posters (or maybe even one vocal poster) is so mean and seem to have so little compassion for AAP kids, some of whose parents describe bullying, social isolation, a genuine academic inability to function in a Gen Ed setting and struggles with 2e. And also has so little of actual substance to say. That poster (because I'd like to think it's just one) hurts people raising valid issues by turning open minded AAP parents off. And yes, that person I would characterize as a troll. Because they are not on this board to discuss a real issue in our schools. They only want to belittle others (kids!), presumably to make themselves feel better.


I think a lot of the anger directed toward the entire AAP situation can be summed up in this way: AAP kids are given a choice of schools that GE kids are not. The GE child who is bullied at his/her base school is stuck there unless the family can fulfill one of the very specific criteria for transferring. The bullied AAP kid, on the other hand, is able to leave for a center school, with no hoops to jump through as the GE student must.

Another example is the family who moves into a "lesser" school boundary, but can send their AAP child to a better school simply because s/he gets into AAP. Meanwhile, the GE kids at this base school have no such option for leaving.

Can you and others possibly see the incredible inequities the families of GE children (not to mention these kids themselves) see every day? If the situations were reversed, and your child was stuck unhappily at one school, but a large group of his/her peers were able to opt for another school - you'd be furious and speaking up about it too. The system is clearly sending a message to our General Ed kids - they are second class citizens within FCPS.


I think something Gen Ed parents are missing that a lot of AAP parents are saying is that a lot of our kids are not better than your kids, but they can be very different. Smart helps in life, but so do things like EQ, Grit, the ability to adapt, etc., and AAP kids can have real issues in these areas. Sure, we all want our kids to be smart. But being exceptionally smart can comes with a whole host of other issues are very concerning for parents: ADHD (huge, especially among the smartest percent and hence the 2e phenomenon), social awkwardness, anxiety, difficulty with athletics, Aspergers. We worry about our kids a lot--not that they won't succeed academically (although that is not a given for 2e kids) but because they are struggling with so many other skills that are also necessary to be a successful adult. Because they know they are different than the other kids and are excluded and are deeply unhappy. An AAP Center or strong base school program is more than an "enriched curriculum." It 's teachers and administrators trained to deal with these issues. And yes, it's the chance for kids like mine to feel connected to peers and like they are not deeply flawed. My son's MS AAP Center team understands how to successfully implement his 504 plan-- because they are trained to work with kids like my son and implement dozens of similar plans each year. My DDs ES Center team knows what do do when I contact them to say that she is getting so anxious about "failing" her SoL that she is throwing up. And know how to implement her 504. Because they work with a dozen kids like her. This is what makes AAP special Ed.

So, yes, if 's nice to get a letter saying that your kid is smart. But realize that in comes with significant strings attached. Be happy your kids is "normal" ( even though by the standards of 95% of the U.S. they are way above average). In this area, that usually means plenty of friends, a sports team, a good college and a good career. There is nothing second class about that. And nobody is saying there is. Be grateful for what you have, because a happy well adjusted child is an enormous gift. Try to find compassion for kids who are struggling. Even better, teach your kids compassion.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can we all just agree that we hate having AAP Centers?


I can certainly agree with this. They create far too many issues, resentment, and divisiveness.


I can certainly disagree with this as my student does not have a peer group at the base school. (He was subjected to frequent bullying, among other things.)
so a child who just misses the cut off for eligibility in your school has to stay and get bullied? You bought your house around certain school boundaries. But your kid gets the option to leave. Hmmm


Exactly. Complete inequity.


I agree. Complete inequity for the one or two students at the base school who are Center eligible. They should be at a Center.
EVERY school should provide appropriate educational services to ALL of it's zoned students. EVery other county in VA(except for FCPS) Does this.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Wouldn't that likely give AAP students exactly one small class of kids they spend 4 years with? How is that better?


Because then it would be the overprivileged AAP kids affected, not mine.



And the insults start flying.

Don't you see how ugly you portray yourself when you start insulting kids who are part of your school community?

It makes all your other arguments tainted.


There are quite a few other posters on this thread and you seem to be attributing all comments to one single person. Please realize, a lot of people share the opinion that centers - especially those previously listed - need to go.

I'm not the PP, but surely you can see how angry parents get when one group of kids is given a choice as to where to go to school, but the other kids aren't? It's completely inequitable.

No. Just responding to that specific poster. I apologize if calling her out for meaness towards children, her chikd's schoolmates and part of her school community hit a nerve with you.

There are a handful of very reasonable posts from folks against AAP. Their arguments carry more weight when they aren't being so rude and petty towards children.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can we all just agree that we hate having AAP Centers?


I can certainly agree with this. They create far too many issues, resentment, and divisiveness.


I can certainly disagree with this as my student does not have a peer group at the base school. (He was subjected to frequent bullying, among other things.)
so a child who just misses the cut off for eligibility in your school has to stay and get bullied? You bought your house around certain school boundaries. But your kid gets the option to leave. Hmmm


It sucks that a child just misses the cut off, but exactly. Her child qualified for a special program. Part of the reason he qualified for the program is a learning style that has statistically high likelihood of being 2e, which is a group of kids that has a very high likelihood of being bullied. And her child stayed in boundary (the AAP boundary) as the school boundary is defined in the FCPS Boundary locator. Google it and plug your address in there. It will spit out 2 boundaries: one AAP, one not. Both are real boundaries, depending on your child's program. And you don't ditch a program almost everyone agrees is needed at some level (whether that is top .5%, 1%, 2%, whatever) because a small number of kids are misidentified or just miss the cut off. And there are frequent complaints from Gen Ed that FCPS overidentifies kids, and should be less willing to take that borderline kid.

Some posters with GE kids on this thread have made really good points that have changed the way I think about the Center school structure. I would note lunate centers, but I see where They can be unnecessary, or even counterproductive in some cases. But a few posters (or maybe even one vocal poster) is so mean and seem to have so little compassion for AAP kids, some of whose parents describe bullying, social isolation, a genuine academic inability to function in a Gen Ed setting and struggles with 2e. And also has so little of actual substance to say. That poster (because I'd like to think it's just one) hurts people raising valid issues by turning open minded AAP parents off. And yes, that person I would characterize as a troll. Because they are not on this board to discuss a real issue in our schools. They only want to belittle others (kids!), presumably to make themselves feel better.


I think a lot of the anger directed toward the entire AAP situation can be summed up in this way: AAP kids are given a choice of schools that GE kids are not. The GE child who is bullied at his/her base school is stuck there unless the family can fulfill one of the very specific criteria for transferring. The bullied AAP kid, on the other hand, is able to leave for a center school, with no hoops to jump through as the GE student must.

Another example is the family who moves into a "lesser" school boundary, but can send their AAP child to a better school simply because s/he gets into AAP. Meanwhile, the GE kids at this base school have no such option for leaving.

Can you and others possibly see the incredible inequities the families of GE children (not to mention these kids themselves) see every day? If the situations were reversed, and your child was stuck unhappily at one school, but a large group of his/her peers were able to opt for another school - you'd be furious and speaking up about it too. The system is clearly sending a message to our General Ed kids - they are second class citizens within FCPS.


I think something Gen Ed parents are missing that a lot of AAP parents are saying is that a lot of our kids are not better than your kids, but they can be very different. Smart helps in life, but so do things like EQ, Grit, the ability to adapt, etc., and AAP kids can have real issues in these areas. Sure, we all want our kids to be smart. But being exceptionally smart can comes with a whole host of other issues are very concerning for parents: ADHD (huge, especially among the smartest percent and hence the 2e phenomenon), social awkwardness, anxiety, difficulty with athletics, Aspergers. We worry about our kids a lot--not that they won't succeed academically (although that is not a given for 2e kids) but because they are struggling with so many other skills that are also necessary to be a successful adult. Because they know they are different than the other kids and are excluded and are deeply unhappy. An AAP Center or strong base school program is more than an "enriched curriculum." It 's teachers and administrators trained to deal with these issues. And yes, it's the chance for kids like mine to feel connected to peers and like they are not deeply flawed. My son's MS AAP Center team understands how to successfully implement his 504 plan-- because they are trained to work with kids like my son and implement dozens of similar plans each year. My DDs ES Center team knows what do do when I contact them to say that she is getting so anxious about "failing" her SoL that she is throwing up. And know how to implement her 504. Because they work with a dozen kids like her. This is what makes AAP special Ed.

So, yes, if 's nice to get a letter saying that your kid is smart. But realize that in comes with significant strings attached. Be happy your kids is "normal" ( even though by the standards of 95% of the U.S. they are way above average). In this area, that usually means plenty of friends, a sports team, a good college and a good career. There is nothing second class about that. And nobody is saying there is. Be grateful for what you have, because a happy well adjusted child is an enormous gift. Try to find compassion for kids who are struggling. Even better, teach your kids compassion.


Honestly, I don't feel this is an issue of compassion, but rather of equity. You mention that there are often kids in AAP who are socially awkward, unathletic, overly anxious, etc. What you've just described is a portion of General Ed kids as well - my own child included. Another one of my children also throws up over severe SOL anxiety, yet she's not in AAP. And she unfortunately doesn't have "a team that knows what to do" when this occurs! How nice that your daughter does.

Unfortunately, there is no "group" that consists wholly of well-adjusted and confident kids. There is a huge overlap between Gen Ed and AAP kids, as most people acknowledge. AAP kids are no longer what GT kids used to be considered - kind of quirky and a little awkward, often due to extremely high intelligence. Sure, there may be some kids like this in AAP, but due to opening it up to far more kids, this phenomenon has been severely diluted.

So when I hear that a child who was bullied, or unable to find his "peer group" is allowed to switch schools, yet my own child - in a very similar situation - is not, I see it as inequity, plain and simple.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can we all just agree that we hate having AAP Centers?


I can certainly agree with this. They create far too many issues, resentment, and divisiveness.


I can certainly disagree with this as my student does not have a peer group at the base school. (He was subjected to frequent bullying, among other things.)
so a child who just misses the cut off for eligibility in your school has to stay and get bullied? You bought your house around certain school boundaries. But your kid gets the option to leave. Hmmm


It sucks that a child just misses the cut off, but exactly. Her child qualified for a special program. Part of the reason he qualified for the program is a learning style that has statistically high likelihood of being 2e, which is a group of kids that has a very high likelihood of being bullied. And her child stayed in boundary (the AAP boundary) as the school boundary is defined in the FCPS Boundary locator. Google it and plug your address in there. It will spit out 2 boundaries: one AAP, one not. Both are real boundaries, depending on your child's program. And you don't ditch a program almost everyone agrees is needed at some level (whether that is top .5%, 1%, 2%, whatever) because a small number of kids are misidentified or just miss the cut off. And there are frequent complaints from Gen Ed that FCPS overidentifies kids, and should be less willing to take that borderline kid.

Some posters with GE kids on this thread have made really good points that have changed the way I think about the Center school structure. I would note lunate centers, but I see where They can be unnecessary, or even counterproductive in some cases. But a few posters (or maybe even one vocal poster) is so mean and seem to have so little compassion for AAP kids, some of whose parents describe bullying, social isolation, a genuine academic inability to function in a Gen Ed setting and struggles with 2e. And also has so little of actual substance to say. That poster (because I'd like to think it's just one) hurts people raising valid issues by turning open minded AAP parents off. And yes, that person I would characterize as a troll. Because they are not on this board to discuss a real issue in our schools. They only want to belittle others (kids!), presumably to make themselves feel better.


I think a lot of the anger directed toward the entire AAP situation can be summed up in this way: AAP kids are given a choice of schools that GE kids are not. The GE child who is bullied at his/her base school is stuck there unless the family can fulfill one of the very specific criteria for transferring. The bullied AAP kid, on the other hand, is able to leave for a center school, with no hoops to jump through as the GE student must.

Another example is the family who moves into a "lesser" school boundary, but can send their AAP child to a better school simply because s/he gets into AAP. Meanwhile, the GE kids at this base school have no such option for leaving.

Can you and others possibly see the incredible inequities the families of GE children (not to mention these kids themselves) see every day? If the situations were reversed, and your child was stuck unhappily at one school, but a large group of his/her peers were able to opt for another school - you'd be furious and speaking up about it too. The system is clearly sending a message to our General Ed kids - they are second class citizens within FCPS.


I think something Gen Ed parents are missing that a lot of AAP parents are saying is that a lot of our kids are not better than your kids, but they can be very different. Smart helps in life, but so do things like EQ, Grit, the ability to adapt, etc., and AAP kids can have real issues in these areas. Sure, we all want our kids to be smart. But being exceptionally smart can comes with a whole host of other issues are very concerning for parents: ADHD (huge, especially among the smartest percent and hence the 2e phenomenon), social awkwardness, anxiety, difficulty with athletics, Aspergers. We worry about our kids a lot--not that they won't succeed academically (although that is not a given for 2e kids) but because they are struggling with so many other skills that are also necessary to be a successful adult. Because they know they are different than the other kids and are excluded and are deeply unhappy. An AAP Center or strong base school program is more than an "enriched curriculum." It 's teachers and administrators trained to deal with these issues. And yes, it's the chance for kids like mine to feel connected to peers and like they are not deeply flawed. My son's MS AAP Center team understands how to successfully implement his 504 plan-- because they are trained to work with kids like my son and implement dozens of similar plans each year. My DDs ES Center team knows what do do when I contact them to say that she is getting so anxious about "failing" her SoL that she is throwing up. And know how to implement her 504. Because they work with a dozen kids like her. This is what makes AAP special Ed.

So, yes, if 's nice to get a letter saying that your kid is smart. But realize that in comes with significant strings attached. Be happy your kids is "normal" ( even though by the standards of 95% of the U.S. they are way above average). In this area, that usually means plenty of friends, a sports team, a good college and a good career. There is nothing second class about that. And nobody is saying there is. Be grateful for what you have, because a happy well adjusted child is an enormous gift. Try to find compassion for kids who are struggling. Even better, teach your kids compassion.


Honestly, I don't feel this is an issue of compassion, but rather of equity. You mention that there are often kids in AAP who are socially awkward, unathletic, overly anxious, etc. What you've just described is a portion of General Ed kids as well - my own child included. Another one of my children also throws up over severe SOL anxiety, yet she's not in AAP. And she unfortunately doesn't have "a team that knows what to do" when this occurs! How nice that your daughter does.

Unfortunately, there is no "group" that consists wholly of well-adjusted and confident kids. There is a huge overlap between Gen Ed and AAP kids, as most people acknowledge. AAP kids are no longer what GT kids used to be considered - kind of quirky and a little awkward, often due to extremely high intelligence. Sure, there may be some kids like this in AAP, but due to opening it up to far more kids, this phenomenon has been severely diluted.

So when I hear that a child who was bullied, or unable to find his "peer group" is allowed to switch schools, yet my own child - in a very similar situation - is not, I see it as inequity, plain and simple.


I suggest completing a multipurpose referral form to have your child considered for special ed services. Eligibility for an IEP is first considered, then 504 Plan eligibility.

We had private testing done for DD (we went to Stixrud but there are other places) and we worked with the AART, the school counselor, and the assistant principal to address issues in both the classroom as well as in large groups. We had a good experience with the behavior plan, as we worked with our therapist each week using the same system in the classroom, in PE, in music, in art, at recess, and at lunch.

A strong staff with 2E expertise should be able to help your child.

Good luck to you!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can we all just agree that we hate having AAP Centers?


I can certainly agree with this. They create far too many issues, resentment, and divisiveness.


I can certainly disagree with this as my student does not have a peer group at the base school. (He was subjected to frequent bullying, among other things.)
so a child who just misses the cut off for eligibility in your school has to stay and get bullied? You bought your house around certain school boundaries. But your kid gets the option to leave. Hmmm


It sucks that a child just misses the cut off, but exactly. Her child qualified for a special program. Part of the reason he qualified for the program is a learning style that has statistically high likelihood of being 2e, which is a group of kids that has a very high likelihood of being bullied. And her child stayed in boundary (the AAP boundary) as the school boundary is defined in the FCPS Boundary locator. Google it and plug your address in there. It will spit out 2 boundaries: one AAP, one not. Both are real boundaries, depending on your child's program. And you don't ditch a program almost everyone agrees is needed at some level (whether that is top .5%, 1%, 2%, whatever) because a small number of kids are misidentified or just miss the cut off. And there are frequent complaints from Gen Ed that FCPS overidentifies kids, and should be less willing to take that borderline kid.

Some posters with GE kids on this thread have made really good points that have changed the way I think about the Center school structure. I would note lunate centers, but I see where They can be unnecessary, or even counterproductive in some cases. But a few posters (or maybe even one vocal poster) is so mean and seem to have so little compassion for AAP kids, some of whose parents describe bullying, social isolation, a genuine academic inability to function in a Gen Ed setting and struggles with 2e. And also has so little of actual substance to say. That poster (because I'd like to think it's just one) hurts people raising valid issues by turning open minded AAP parents off. And yes, that person I would characterize as a troll. Because they are not on this board to discuss a real issue in our schools. They only want to belittle others (kids!), presumably to make themselves feel better.



Well said!

I have a kid who is in the profoundly gifted range and would have qualified for this program whatever the form.

He needed AAP, especially in elementary. AAP was amazing for him, and I credit tue teachers' understanding of kids like him during elementary school with getting him to the point where he doesn't necessarily "need" the program as much in middle school. AAP accomplished what it should with my kid.

As much as he needed AAP, and kids in his range need AAP, the kids who more than any other in my opinion who really, undeniably need the AAP centers are the twice exceptional kids. They find their people in AAP, even if "people" just means more than one friend to eat with at lunch, hang out with at recess and sit next to in PE.

Those kids desparately need the center program. And having that peer group helps many of them to have the confidence to relax, pick up social cues, learn to relate to some really interesting and supportive kids, and hopefully transition to the point that they don't need AAP quite as badly by middle or high school.

Seeing the benefit for those kinds of kids make me a stong advocate for centers. I have seen tue benefits to them and I have also seen in my own family how terrible and lonely life can be for the 2E kids who struggle through life never ever finding their people.

I imagine that is why some of the parents here are so passionate about their kid finding a peer group.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can we all just agree that we hate having AAP Centers?


I can certainly agree with this. They create far too many issues, resentment, and divisiveness.


I can certainly disagree with this as my student does not have a peer group at the base school. (He was subjected to frequent bullying, among other things.)
so a child who just misses the cut off for eligibility in your school has to stay and get bullied? You bought your house around certain school boundaries. But your kid gets the option to leave. Hmmm


It sucks that a child just misses the cut off, but exactly. Her child qualified for a special program. Part of the reason he qualified for the program is a learning style that has statistically high likelihood of being 2e, which is a group of kids that has a very high likelihood of being bullied. And her child stayed in boundary (the AAP boundary) as the school boundary is defined in the FCPS Boundary locator. Google it and plug your address in there. It will spit out 2 boundaries: one AAP, one not. Both are real boundaries, depending on your child's program. And you don't ditch a program almost everyone agrees is needed at some level (whether that is top .5%, 1%, 2%, whatever) because a small number of kids are misidentified or just miss the cut off. And there are frequent complaints from Gen Ed that FCPS overidentifies kids, and should be less willing to take that borderline kid.

Some posters with GE kids on this thread have made really good points that have changed the way I think about the Center school structure. I would note lunate centers, but I see where They can be unnecessary, or even counterproductive in some cases. But a few posters (or maybe even one vocal poster) is so mean and seem to have so little compassion for AAP kids, some of whose parents describe bullying, social isolation, a genuine academic inability to function in a Gen Ed setting and struggles with 2e. And also has so little of actual substance to say. That poster (because I'd like to think it's just one) hurts people raising valid issues by turning open minded AAP parents off. And yes, that person I would characterize as a troll. Because they are not on this board to discuss a real issue in our schools. They only want to belittle others (kids!), presumably to make themselves feel better.


I think a lot of the anger directed toward the entire AAP situation can be summed up in this way: AAP kids are given a choice of schools that GE kids are not. The GE child who is bullied at his/her base school is stuck there unless the family can fulfill one of the very specific criteria for transferring. The bullied AAP kid, on the other hand, is able to leave for a center school, with no hoops to jump through as the GE student must.

Another example is the family who moves into a "lesser" school boundary, but can send their AAP child to a better school simply because s/he gets into AAP. Meanwhile, the GE kids at this base school have no such option for leaving.

Can you and others possibly see the incredible inequities the families of GE children (not to mention these kids themselves) see every day? If the situations were reversed, and your child was stuck unhappily at one school, but a large group of his/her peers were able to opt for another school - you'd be furious and speaking up about it too. The system is clearly sending a message to our General Ed kids - they are second class citizens within FCPS.


It is not an inequity becasue every last child in the district is screened for entry into this program. Not once, but multiple times. Not limited to teacher recommendations or parent applications or school quotas as has been the case in the three other states we lived in. Every single child. If the parents don't agree with the results, they can provide their own testing or request rescreening. Every single student not accepted can reapply every single year. If you move in from out of state you are tested for the program, both with the cogat and the nnat. Even if you have tests from the other states, which might have qualified you for the GT program there but were too low to qualify in Fairfax County.

FCPS leaves not a single stone unturned to do their utmost to provide this service to every possibke kid who could qualify.

If that is not equitable than what is?
post reply Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: