Big GDS news

[Anonymous]

So this is being done so GDS can have VIPs?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No criticism of GDS, but concerned how they are going to manage 1000 students in confined periods of pick-ups and drop offs during confined periods of the day, particularly if, as rumored, they propose closing 42nd Street.

GDS will manage the traffic and will make the expanded site very safe and secure. This is likely a top priority. The reason the Obamas didn't go to GDS in the end was concern about traffic backup at the Palisades site. The expanded Wisconsin campus, especially if 42nd St is figured out, will make GDS fully competitive in recruiting students who are VIP protectees.

Unlike Sidwell and STA/NCS, GDS could care less about "recruiting VIP's'. We get plenty of applicants who are a right fit for the school. High profile VIP types don't typically mesh well. I am glad the Obamas didn't go to GDS. It would have affected the school and its applicant pool.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No criticism of GDS, but concerned how they are going to manage 1000 students in confined periods of pick-ups and drop offs during confined periods of the day, particularly if, as rumored, they propose closing 42nd Street.

GDS will manage the traffic and will make the expanded site very safe and secure. This is likely a top priority. The reason the Obamas didn't go to GDS in the end was concern about traffic backup at the Palisades site. The expanded Wisconsin campus, especially if 42nd St is figured out, will make GDS fully competitive in recruiting students who are VIP protectees.

Unlike Sidwell and STA/NCS, GDS could care less about "recruiting VIP's'. We get plenty of applicants who are a right fit for the school. High profile VIP types don't typically mesh well. I am glad the Obamas didn't go to GDS. It would have affected the school and its applicant pool.

Such preening self-congratulatory self-righteousness must be a troll, right? Or is this a little Aesop at work? (Those grapes were undoubtedly sour!)

[Anonymous]

I don't want to wade through 10 pages of this thread so forgive me as I'm sure the answer is buried in here somewhere, but what is the projected timeframe and completion date for the project?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No criticism of GDS, but concerned how they are going to manage 1000 students in confined periods of pick-ups and drop offs during confined periods of the day, particularly if, as rumored, they propose closing 42nd Street.

GDS will manage the traffic and will make the expanded site very safe and secure. This is likely a top priority. The reason the Obamas didn't go to GDS in the end was concern about traffic backup at the Palisades site. The expanded Wisconsin campus, especially if 42nd St is figured out, will make GDS fully competitive in recruiting students who are VIP protectees.

Unlike Sidwell and STA/NCS, GDS could care less about "recruiting VIP's'. We get plenty of applicants who are a right fit for the school. High profile VIP types don't typically mesh well. I am glad the Obamas didn't go to GDS. It would have affected the school and its applicant pool.

Dido for me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No criticism of GDS, but concerned how they are going to manage 1000 students in confined periods of pick-ups and drop offs during confined periods of the day, particularly if, as rumored, they propose closing 42nd Street.

GDS will manage the traffic and will make the expanded site very safe and secure. This is likely a top priority. The reason the Obamas didn't go to GDS in the end was concern about traffic backup at the Palisades site. The expanded Wisconsin campus, especially if 42nd St is figured out, will make GDS fully competitive in recruiting students who are VIP protectees.

Unlike Sidwell and STA/NCS, GDS could care less about "recruiting VIP's'. We get plenty of applicants who are a right fit for the school. High profile VIP types don't typically mesh well. I am glad the Obamas didn't go to GDS. It would have affected the school and its applicant pool.

Such preening self-congratulatory self-righteousness must be a troll, right? Or is this a little Aesop at work? (Those grapes were undoubtedly sour!)

Try just an honest sentiment. Why such hatefulness

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No criticism of GDS, but concerned how they are going to manage 1000 students in confined periods of pick-ups and drop offs during confined periods of the day, particularly if, as rumored, they propose closing 42nd Street.

GDS will manage the traffic and will make the expanded site very safe and secure. This is likely a top priority. The reason the Obamas didn't go to GDS in the end was concern about traffic backup at the Palisades site. The expanded Wisconsin campus, especially if 42nd St is figured out, will make GDS fully competitive in recruiting students who are VIP protectees.

Unlike Sidwell and STA/NCS, GDS could care less about "recruiting VIP's'. We get plenty of applicants who are a right fit for the school. High profile VIP types don't typically mesh well. I am glad the Obamas didn't go to GDS. It would have affected the school and its applicant pool.

Dido for me.

Re: "Dido": From Aesop to Aeneas, all in the same page!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No criticism of GDS, but concerned how they are going to manage 1000 students in confined periods of pick-ups and drop offs during confined periods of the day, particularly if, as rumored, they propose closing 42nd Street.

GDS will manage the traffic and will make the expanded site very safe and secure. This is likely a top priority. The reason the Obamas didn't go to GDS in the end was concern about traffic backup at the Palisades site. The expanded Wisconsin campus, especially if 42nd St is figured out, will make GDS fully competitive in recruiting students who are VIP protectees.

Unlike Sidwell and STA/NCS, GDS could care less about "recruiting VIP's'. We get plenty of applicants who are a right fit for the school. High profile VIP types don't typically mesh well. I am glad the Obamas didn't go to GDS. It would have affected the school and its applicant pool.

Such preening self-congratulatory self-righteousness must be a troll, right? Or is this a little Aesop at work? (Those grapes were undoubtedly sour!)

Try just an honest sentiment. Why such hatefulness

Because the "honest sentiment" was honestly self-congratulatory, preening, and self-righteous. It might not have been hateful but it was sneering and nasty (for example, referencing other supposedly less morally pure schools by name). It's also delusional and ahistorical-- GDS (both the admin and the parent body) was desperate to have the Obama girls enroll. It didn't work because of security concerns but the GDS community wanted it badly. I don't blame them -- it would have really fit into the school's historical narrative -- but to pretend now that GDS didn't want those kids and is above any interest in VIP kids is just fantasy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No criticism of GDS, but concerned how they are going to manage 1000 students in confined periods of pick-ups and drop offs during confined periods of the day, particularly if, as rumored, they propose closing 42nd Street.

GDS will manage the traffic and will make the expanded site very safe and secure. This is likely a top priority. The reason the Obamas didn't go to GDS in the end was concern about traffic backup at the Palisades site. The expanded Wisconsin campus, especially if 42nd St is figured out, will make GDS fully competitive in recruiting students who are VIP protectees.

Unlike Sidwell and STA/NCS, GDS could care less about "recruiting VIP's'. We get plenty of applicants who are a right fit for the school. High profile VIP types don't typically mesh well. I am glad the Obamas didn't go to GDS. It would have affected the school and its applicant pool.

Such preening self-congratulatory self-righteousness must be a troll, right? Or is this a little Aesop at work? (Those grapes were undoubtedly sour!)

Try just an honest sentiment. Why such hatefulness

Because the "honest sentiment" was honestly self-congratulatory, preening, and self-righteous. It might not have been hateful but it was sneering and nasty (for example, referencing other supposedly less morally pure schools by name). It's also delusional and ahistorical-- GDS (both the admin and the parent body) was desperate to have the Obama girls enroll. It didn't work because of security concerns but the GDS community wanted it badly. I don't blame them -- it would have really fit into the school's historical narrative -- but to pretend now that GDS didn't want those kids and is above any interest in VIP kids is just fantasy.

I was a parent at the time and did not want it as the security issues would have made everything a little more cumbersome. Not to mention the school can become a target for terrorists when high profile children attend. I do not think these people are pretending.

[Anonymous]

Go read the news accounts and the comments in this forum and others where stories were published. GDS wanted it.

[Anonymous]

Yes, at the time the Obamas were elected, the Washington Post did a series of stories about where the Obama kids would go to school. And, people at GDS were pushing for it.

I think they should have gone to DC public schools to help improve them. It's strange to me when liberals brag about the public schools, teachers unions, etc. and then don't send their own kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes, at the time the Obamas were elected, the Washington Post did a series of stories about where the Obama kids would go to school. And, people at GDS were pushing for it.

I think they should have gone to DC public schools to help improve them. It's strange to me when liberals brag about the public schools, teachers unions, etc. and then don't send their own kids.

1. Personally, while I can appreciate the symbolic act of a President choosing public school, I think it largely would be a mere symbol, with little long term benefit.
2. I don't think any parent would (or should) choose a particular school system for his child based on what people watching on TV will say. Indeed, I'd be pretty disappointed if any politician (Obama or otherwise) said, in effect, "I think my children will be happiest and best served at School A, but I'm sending them to School B because of what the general public will think." How could you ask a politician to make an education choice that hurts his children (or respect one who did)?
3. Do you want to play the broad brush "when liberals brag ..." game? First, it makes the mistake of classing millions of people into one viewpoint, based stupidly on who they voted for. Second, I'm sure we can offer plenty of versions of "when conservatives brag ..." that are similarly ridiculous.
4. I guess if the Obamas had chosen public school, they could be complaining with all the other DCPS parents who are mad their children are being reassigned from Wilson High School to Cardozo High School!

[Anonymous]

People would have been thrilled if the Obamas chose public. They would have attracted much-needed resources to the DC Publics. I bet your kids go to nice suburban schools pp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People would have been thrilled if the Obamas chose public. They would have attracted much-needed resources to the DC Publics. I bet your kids go to nice suburban schools pp.

Wrong on all counts.

[Anonymous]

The Carters tried that -- Amy attended DCPS. By the time the Clinton's came in, they knew better.