Revolving Door at Holton

[Anonymous]

I like the comments by the disgruntled teachers. They make them look bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL at the claims of "cyberbulllying."

Yes, 23 pages trashing someone in an anonymous forum is absolutely normal. What’s wrong with these people?

The thread is about the departure of a large number of faculty and staff in a short period of time. The head's leadership is what's being blamed. That's not cyber bullying.

Yes it is. Read the comments about the leadership. They are personal and no concrete feedback on how to improve things. Totally cyberbullying.

Then you aren't reading the comments carefully at all. Plenty of allegations about things that may have happened.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL at the claims of "cyberbulllying."

Yes, 23 pages trashing someone in an anonymous forum is absolutely normal. What’s wrong with these people?

The thread is about the departure of a large number of faculty and staff in a short period of time. The head's leadership is what's being blamed. That's not cyber bullying.

Yes it is. Read the comments about the leadership. They are personal and no concrete feedback on how to improve things. Totally cyberbullying.

Then you aren't reading the comments carefully at all. Plenty of allegations about things that may have happened.

Yes fully corroborated, in some dark corner of your mind.

[Anonymous]

I'm taking no position on whether or not they were corroborated. Just that they are concrete comments about actual perceived issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm taking no position on whether or not they were corroborated. Just that they are concrete comments about actual perceived issues.

Very useful.

[Anonymous]

Allegations of fact are not cyberbullying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Allegations of fact are not cyberbullying.

Noncorroborated allegations of “facts” by anonymous posters ARE cyber bullying.

[Anonymous]

Not when they're about perceived wrongdoing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not when they're about perceived wrongdoing.

Yes, when the perception seems to be distorted. Read the OP.

[Anonymous]

Gaslighting accusers is straight out of the DARVO playbook.

[Anonymous]

Denying a false statement is simply setting the record straight, not DARVO.

[Anonymous]

Is it your contention that every single statement in the OP is false?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is it your contention that every single statement in the OP is false?

No, some are plainly false and some uncorroborated.

[Anonymous]

So what parts of the OP are true?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So what parts of the OP are true?

When one anynomous person say things that doesn’t become automatically true. Otherwise all things that trump say are true as well. Don’t see all Holton parents supporting OP. I wouldn’t say that everything is false. Just uncorroborated. Or in other terms, the opinion of a single person that is as valuable as my own opinion.