If you could know the truth about any unsolved mystery, which would it be?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:JFK? Jon-Benet?

JFK is not an unsolved mystery, unless you’re a nutter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel like Burke accidentally whacking JB too hard is most likely scenario, but what trips me up here is the staging of the body afterward. I can maybe see the parent(s) applying the duct tape and wrist ties... but not the business with the garotte and the paintbrush, nor can I see a little kid Burke's age coming up with that. I just can't picture loving parents doing that to their child even as part of staging a crime scene.

I just watched the first episode and it doesn’t add up. Her wrists were not lightly bound; but very tight. Those neck wounds from the garret (which took quite a bit of skill). She was alive when the garter was made (her hair was caught in it) and the neck torture occurred at about the same time as the head trauma. The autopsy tells a story of torture, not an accidental wack on the head after she stole a piece of Burke’s pineapple or a “cover up.” Patsy comes across as a complete liar and the Fad comes across as innocent-ish. Burke is clearly autistic but that doesn’t make him a psychopath. I would pick Patsy if it wasn’t for the sexual assault with the paintbrush. It had to be the Dad.

And the fact that the police got the DNA results that exonerated all three Ramseys and suppressed that? That DNA was found under her fingernails and on her underwear that belonged to an unidentified male? And that Boulder police planted stories with friendly reporters that were fake implying the Ramseys did it?

Do you have more info about the DNA? I had read that it was “touch DNA” that could have been from whoever manufactured the underwear, and that it was not enough to make the police think anyone else had really touched her body

Under her fingernails too?

The police were obsessed with explaining away the DNA and tried to trace it back to the manufacturer. But how would that have gotten under her nails?

I don’t know, that’s why I’m asking if you read anything different. I didn’t read that it was this large amount of DNA or even that it was skin under her nails. Just the same touch DNA which I read could have been just from her putting on the new underwear with her hands. But I don’t know of course.

You would then have to believe that Patsy put those panties on JB for the first time ever that night and without washing them. That’s ridiculous.

The child wet the bed late at night, she grabbed the new panties to put on her in haste. Doesn't seem at all weird to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How the royal family had Diana killed in Paris and made it look like an accident. The only person who survived was Diana's Met protection officer.

Same. The chauffeur's family and friends emphatically stated he did not drink, but the authorities claimed his blood alcohol level was very high. Uh, huh.

I think to royal family sold Diana out, just like they did Megan and Harry, and intentionally put their her/lives in danger. I don't know they purposefully intended for it to kill Diana and/or Megan but were rather indifferent. Their selling stories, lapses in security and open hostility to anyone other than Charles/William and their immediate orbit. The family is totally bizarly coddling Camila and catherine but destroyed Diana and Megan. I believe in our lifetime the truth will come out about how $hitty that family is and what they've done to destroy Diana. The truth behind what they did to Megan will come in my children's lifetime.

You people are crazy! Get a life. Diana died for one very simple reason: she was not wearing her seat belt. The only person who didn't die was Trevor Rees-Jones, her bodyguard, because he did wear him seat belt. As for Meghan and Harry, world class whiners and narcissists.

This sums it up. She sadly had very poor judgment. Instead of being with a guy who was engaged she should have been home with her kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would want to know if there is anything out there after I die. I would want to reunite with some people.

For enternity? That’s a long time to be with anyone. My dog maybe I could do.

Such an odd sentiment. To spend eternity with your dog as opposed to, say, your child.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How the royal family had Diana killed in Paris and made it look like an accident. The only person who survived was Diana's Met protection officer.

Same. The chauffeur's family and friends emphatically stated he did not drink, but the authorities claimed his blood alcohol level was very high. Uh, huh.

I think to royal family sold Diana out, just like they did Megan and Harry, and intentionally put their her/lives in danger. I don't know they purposefully intended for it to kill Diana and/or Megan but were rather indifferent. Their selling stories, lapses in security and open hostility to anyone other than Charles/William and their immediate orbit. The family is totally bizarly coddling Camila and catherine but destroyed Diana and Megan. I believe in our lifetime the truth will come out about how $hitty that family is and what they've done to destroy Diana. The truth behind what they did to Megan will come in my children's lifetime.

You people are crazy! Get a life. Diana died for one very simple reason: she was not wearing her seat belt. The only person who didn't die was Trevor Rees-Jones, her bodyguard, because he did wear him seat belt. As for Meghan and Harry, world class whiners and narcissists.

This sums it up. She sadly had very poor judgment. Instead of being with a guy who was engaged she should have been home with her kids.

well to be fair she wasn't allowed to be "home with her kids", they were with Prince Charles and the Queen at the time,.

[Anonymous]

Kyron Harmon is the weirdest one to me. All of the others- there is usually one very likely scenario, or a few very plausible scenarios. Kyron seems to have disappeared out of thin air and was last seen walking down his school's hallway but never making it to his classroom? But no witnesses of him leaving with anyone? In these cases I feel like it's always the noncustodial parent (in this case, the mom) but that would be to abduct him and run off with him, not to kill him and get rid of him with zero witnesses, zero evidence in her vehicles, etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The UVA college kid, Otto, who was detained for taking down a poster in North Korea and was released a vegetable a few years later. Did he really take down a poster or was it faked by the North Korean government? I don't think we will ever know.

I’ve been to DPRK. I’m sure he took it down. If he was drunk in the “island” hotel for visitors he could have easily done something stupid, and they took it seriously and made an example of him. Also, the tour guides there aren’t your friends. They would report him or they’d get in trouble, if they’d seen it. Our group quietly questioned things in whispers away from people, but he was a kid and stupid, and probably drunk because there’s nothing to do there at night but drink in the hotel and do karaoke. You have zero freedom if you visit.

North Koreans live up to their barbaric reputation.

Killing someone's child while he's a guest in their country, over a poster.

You act like some five year old tore down a poster because he was having a melt down. Someone smart enough to get into UVA and with parents who could afford to pay for a trip to North Korea should not have done something so stupid. I went to an international school in Indonesia and some stupid American kid decided to vape pot in an outdoor cafe. He was sentenced to four years in prison and came out half human. He is still living with his parents and will never be capable of independent living.

[Anonymous]

The two princes in the Tower

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How the royal family had Diana killed in Paris and made it look like an accident. The only person who survived was Diana's Met protection officer.

Same. The chauffeur's family and friends emphatically stated he did not drink, but the authorities claimed his blood alcohol level was very high. Uh, huh.

I think to royal family sold Diana out, just like they did Megan and Harry, and intentionally put their her/lives in danger. I don't know they purposefully intended for it to kill Diana and/or Megan but were rather indifferent. Their selling stories, lapses in security and open hostility to anyone other than Charles/William and their immediate orbit. The family is totally bizarly coddling Camila and catherine but destroyed Diana and Megan. I believe in our lifetime the truth will come out about how $hitty that family is and what they've done to destroy Diana. The truth behind what they did to Megan will come in my children's lifetime.

You people are crazy! Get a life. Diana died for one very simple reason: she was not wearing her seat belt. The only person who didn't die was Trevor Rees-Jones, her bodyguard, because he did wear him seat belt. As for Meghan and Harry, world class whiners and narcissists.

This sums it up. She sadly had very poor judgment. Instead of being with a guy who was engaged she should have been home with her kids.

well to be fair she wasn't allowed to be "home with her kids", they were with Prince Charles and the Queen at the time,.

They were with Prince Charles and the Queen when Diana died because instead of returning to England so that she would be there for the beginning of the school year, she decided to extend her vacation with Dodi. The boys had been with Diana earlier on the vacation and returned to England for their father's agreed upon time with them. When Diana extended her vacation, the boys stayed with Charles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The UVA college kid, Otto, who was detained for taking down a poster in North Korea and was released a vegetable a few years later. Did he really take down a poster or was it faked by the North Korean government? I don't think we will ever know.

I’ve been to DPRK. I’m sure he took it down. If he was drunk in the “island” hotel for visitors he could have easily done something stupid, and they took it seriously and made an example of him. Also, the tour guides there aren’t your friends. They would report him or they’d get in trouble, if they’d seen it. Our group quietly questioned things in whispers away from people, but he was a kid and stupid, and probably drunk because there’s nothing to do there at night but drink in the hotel and do karaoke. You have zero freedom if you visit.

North Koreans live up to their barbaric reputation.

Killing someone's child while he's a guest in their country, over a poster.

You act like some five year old tore down a poster because he was having a melt down. Someone smart enough to get into UVA and with parents who could afford to pay for a trip to North Korea should not have done something so stupid. I went to an international school in Indonesia and some stupid American kid decided to vape pot in an outdoor cafe. He was sentenced to four years in prison and came out half human. He is still living with his parents and will never be capable of independent living.

At least he’s still alive, unlike some of the Bali Nine.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bali_Nine

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Barry and Honey Sherman. Both found hung at home. Very rich family. $35 million dollar reward being offered to find the killers.

Did you listen to the podcast? Fascinating story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lord Lucan. Where'd he go and where is he now

I have a connection to that story but am too paranoid to share.

While his body was never found, I assume he drowned.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The lady who disappeared in the middle of the woods leaving her car and zero trace. I can’t remember her name, somewhere in the northeast but I think she was training to be a doctor.

It was a nursing student with a serious alcohol problem who disappeared into the snowy woods after crashing her car and BROUGHT the box of liquor with her. Unfortunately I don’t see much of a mystery to that one.

But body never recovered?

[Anonymous]

The origin of the earth and humans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The UVA college kid, Otto, who was detained for taking down a poster in North Korea and was released a vegetable a few years later. Did he really take down a poster or was it faked by the North Korean government? I don't think we will ever know.

I’ve been to DPRK. I’m sure he took it down. If he was drunk in the “island” hotel for visitors he could have easily done something stupid, and they took it seriously and made an example of him. Also, the tour guides there aren’t your friends. They would report him or they’d get in trouble, if they’d seen it. Our group quietly questioned things in whispers away from people, but he was a kid and stupid, and probably drunk because there’s nothing to do there at night but drink in the hotel and do karaoke. You have zero freedom if you visit.

North Koreans live up to their barbaric reputation.

Killing someone's child while he's a guest in their country, over a poster.

You act like some five year old tore down a poster because he was having a melt down. Someone smart enough to get into UVA and with parents who could afford to pay for a trip to North Korea should not have done something so stupid. I went to an international school in Indonesia and some stupid American kid decided to vape pot in an outdoor cafe. He was sentenced to four years in prison and came out half human. He is still living with his parents and will never be capable of independent living.

Barbaric.