Kate's New Picture

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can't believe with the way paparazzi is usually described, including in Harry's book that no one has managed to track her down. I'm not advocating for it - I think she deserves privacy and the paparazzi are ruthless and dangerous - but it's odd that she hasn't been spotted, right?

Because they have orders from the big palace, Buckingham Palace, not to do so

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can't believe with the way paparazzi is usually described, including in Harry's book that no one has managed to track her down. I'm not advocating for it - I think she deserves privacy and the paparazzi are ruthless and dangerous - but it's odd that she hasn't been spotted, right?

Yes. Or the children, in their comings and goings.

I mean, my children exit our neighborhood by car at least once a day, and return the same way. In two months not one person has been spotted coming or going, with all this going on? You’d think the paps would be tripping over each other to capture the first picture.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can't believe with the way paparazzi is usually described, including in Harry's book that no one has managed to track her down. I'm not advocating for it - I think she deserves privacy and the paparazzi are ruthless and dangerous - but it's odd that she hasn't been spotted, right?

Because they have orders from the big palace, Buckingham Palace, not to do so

Lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The more you look at this, you see that there is ultimately some big secret underlying all of the botched PR.
What is the big secret?

A. Surgery for abdominal??? No visitors; no pictures; no statements?

Or

B. no surgery and that was used as an excuse for something else. Resulting in more secrecy and botched Pr.

My money on B.

B.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The more you look at this, you see that there is ultimately some big secret underlying all of the botched PR.
What is the big secret?

A. Surgery for abdominal??? No visitors; no pictures; no statements?

Or

B. no surgery and that was used as an excuse for something else. Resulting in more secrecy and botched Pr.

My money on B.

Thats where I am at. I think that's why the PR has been so botched as well. Something is happening and they're having trouble navigating it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can't believe with the way paparazzi is usually described, including in Harry's book that no one has managed to track her down. I'm not advocating for it - I think she deserves privacy and the paparazzi are ruthless and dangerous - but it's odd that she hasn't been spotted, right?

Yes. Or the children, in their comings and goings.

I mean, my children exit our neighborhood by car at least once a day, and return the same way. In two months not one person has been spotted coming or going, with all this going on? You’d think the paps would be tripping over each other to capture the first picture.

British pap (aka royal rota) needs permission to do this…they’ve been told to stand down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some are speculating that royal divorce proceedings are underway and it is a long negotiation and that’s why her parents have not been seen either. They are holed up with her. And if she can last, until after the king dies, it may be too hard for him to divorce her. As she will be Queen.

There was no surgery according to this theory (possible hospitalization due to eating disorder or mental instability).

She may not have seen her children since then either. If in fact, this is what William wants and he is trying to make a new life with Rose.

That’s the big theory circulating in British aristocratic circles.

British press definitely knows more than they are saying. Especially that negative hit job that they were told to run on her before it was switched a day later to be a hit job on Harry.

Why Rose? I actually wouldn't be surprised if a divorce or separation was happening in the background. It would explain a lot of the secrecy and bad PR attempts but I don't think it's for Rose.

Why would you divorce your wife and create this giant royal ruckus if there was not another woman?

💯

Read British press. There’s a divorce brewing

https://medium.com/@sueteh999/what-was-behind-the-cold-freezing-adelaide-cottage-story-a3f252264852

In what circumstance would support for Kate dwindle? Not for a divorce, not for a seriously health issue, not for a mistress. There is basically no scenario that Kate doesn't come out on top.

Someone said this disaster PR job has caused support for them to dwindle which is true.

Not them. It was specifically said for Kate.

It clearly says "But the way they've handled this makes it seem like they're all a bunch of lying frauds."

No. A pp said Kate was especially well liked before this. What has changed? Show evidence and not this silly site.

What changed? How about how her dodgy PR?

Prove it.

look at comments? Not just here but twitter and facebook. Already know that it wont be enough for you, but you can't change people don't like being lied too.

You're a fool. Just admit you have no idea and move on instead of digging in.

Are you the same person that tried up and down to say these pictures weren't edited? And then called everyone obsessed for pointing out the obvious?

Nope try again. Just laughing at people here who think their little echo chambers on social media are at all reliable or proof of anything. Can you post a singular poll that says support has declined? How far are you going to go with this before you give up?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The more you look at this, you see that there is ultimately some big secret underlying all of the botched PR.
What is the big secret?

A. Surgery for abdominal??? No visitors; no pictures; no statements?

Or

B. no surgery and that was used as an excuse for something else. Resulting in more secrecy and botched Pr.

My money on B.

Thats where I am at. I think that's why the PR has been so botched as well. Something is happening and they're having trouble navigating it.

This. Or, they are navigating it carefully, because it’s happened before and didn’t go well.

[Anonymous]

Pattern on Louis' sleeve doesn't line up

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can't believe with the way paparazzi is usually described, including in Harry's book that no one has managed to track her down. I'm not advocating for it - I think she deserves privacy and the paparazzi are ruthless and dangerous - but it's odd that she hasn't been spotted, right?

Yes. Or the children, in their comings and goings.

I mean, my children exit our neighborhood by car at least once a day, and return the same way. In two months not one person has been spotted coming or going, with all this going on? You’d think the paps would be tripping over each other to capture the first picture.

British pap (aka royal rota) needs permission to do this…they’ve been told to stand down.

Who took the picture of “Kate” and her mom the other day then?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some are speculating that royal divorce proceedings are underway and it is a long negotiation and that’s why her parents have not been seen either. They are holed up with her. And if she can last, until after the king dies, it may be too hard for him to divorce her. As she will be Queen.

There was no surgery according to this theory (possible hospitalization due to eating disorder or mental instability).

She may not have seen her children since then either. If in fact, this is what William wants and he is trying to make a new life with Rose.

That’s the big theory circulating in British aristocratic circles.

British press definitely knows more than they are saying. Especially that negative hit job that they were told to run on her before it was switched a day later to be a hit job on Harry.

Why Rose? I actually wouldn't be surprised if a divorce or separation was happening in the background. It would explain a lot of the secrecy and bad PR attempts but I don't think it's for Rose.

Why would you divorce your wife and create this giant royal ruckus if there was not another woman?

💯

Read British press. There’s a divorce brewing

https://medium.com/@sueteh999/what-was-behind-the-cold-freezing-adelaide-cottage-story-a3f252264852

In what circumstance would support for Kate dwindle? Not for a divorce, not for a seriously health issue, not for a mistress. There is basically no scenario that Kate doesn't come out on top.

If William divorce Kate tomorrow the British public would not care! She would just be another commoner to them.

Are you slow? Do you think people would feel more sympathy for Kate or William? Think hard!

Not PP. I think initially there would be more sympathy for Kate but William has access to the whole media machinery in a way Kate does not without him so overtime he would get a rebrand just like his dad did for Camilla.

So over decades? That's how you think this will play out? Yes let's check back in 20-30 years and maybe this will end up the same way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some are speculating that royal divorce proceedings are underway and it is a long negotiation and that’s why her parents have not been seen either. They are holed up with her. And if she can last, until after the king dies, it may be too hard for him to divorce her. As she will be Queen.

There was no surgery according to this theory (possible hospitalization due to eating disorder or mental instability).

She may not have seen her children since then either. If in fact, this is what William wants and he is trying to make a new life with Rose.

That’s the big theory circulating in British aristocratic circles.

British press definitely knows more than they are saying. Especially that negative hit job that they were told to run on her before it was switched a day later to be a hit job on Harry.

Why Rose? I actually wouldn't be surprised if a divorce or separation was happening in the background. It would explain a lot of the secrecy and bad PR attempts but I don't think it's for Rose.

Why would you divorce your wife and create this giant royal ruckus if there was not another woman?

💯

Read British press. There’s a divorce brewing

https://medium.com/@sueteh999/what-was-behind-the-cold-freezing-adelaide-cottage-story-a3f252264852

In what circumstance would support for Kate dwindle? Not for a divorce, not for a seriously health issue, not for a mistress. There is basically no scenario that Kate doesn't come out on top.

If William divorce Kate tomorrow the British public would not care! She would just be another commoner to them.

i

She has so much leverage though. The stories that she has. She would be entitled to a giant settlement.

That’s what her parents would be negotiating. This line of thought is even remotely possible.

Agree that she’d have leverage in any sort of separation if William was Reasonable. He doesn’t strike me as reasonable…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can't believe with the way paparazzi is usually described, including in Harry's book that no one has managed to track her down. I'm not advocating for it - I think she deserves privacy and the paparazzi are ruthless and dangerous - but it's odd that she hasn't been spotted, right?

Yes. Or the children, in their comings and goings.

I mean, my children exit our neighborhood by car at least once a day, and return the same way. In two months not one person has been spotted coming or going, with all this going on? You’d think the paps would be tripping over each other to capture the first picture.

British pap (aka royal rota) needs permission to do this…they’ve been told to stand down.

Who took the picture of “Kate” and her mom the other day then?

American pap

[Anonymous]

I’m on the fence about the photo. Seems like a lot of greenery for this time of year and she looks much better than those photos in the car. But maybe those things are nothing.

However does anyone truly believe William took the photo? We have literally never heard of him doing that before (unlike Kate) and the composition looks very professional.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can't believe with the way paparazzi is usually described, including in Harry's book that no one has managed to track her down. I'm not advocating for it - I think she deserves privacy and the paparazzi are ruthless and dangerous - but it's odd that she hasn't been spotted, right?

Yes. Or the children, in their comings and goings.

I mean, my children exit our neighborhood by car at least once a day, and return the same way. In two months not one person has been spotted coming or going, with all this going on? You’d think the paps would be tripping over each other to capture the first picture.

British pap (aka royal rota) needs permission to do this…they’ve been told to stand down.

Who took the picture of “Kate” and her mom the other day then?

American pap

It was backgrid. Someone obviously set that up.