Disappointed by TJ decision?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I have heard some superstars, who were winning STEM awards at the state level, were getting rejected. And it had nothing to do with bad grades as others here like to claim.


This was true at our feeder school.


Same here. All kids know it. 7th graders are even told not to mention any STEM achievements in essays. The so called “top 1.5%” is fake when there is no clear standards.


+1. Also know a kid from traditional feeder school who is a STEM super star with multiple awards at regional, state, and national level. Was put to "wait pool".


That didn't happen. But congrats on driving your narrative.



NP here. It did happen at two feeders I know about. Seriously, what is TJ admissions doing? They are sabotaging the school. From the outside, it looks intentional.


Absolutely, I heard kids are saying that those very top students are rejected on purpose so that those Unqualified but admitted won’ t look so bad at TJ.


Did you hear this from Q or just when you take off the tinfoil hat?


Lady you need to get out of the VR/AR world and look at the data. Close to 10% of the class of 2025 has moved out (including 2 in March). I do not believe that the TJ admission is deliberately rejecting the top students but certainly the data points they have to identify the top students need to be re-visited (at least include some achievements, teacher recommendations etc. in addition to grades and essays)


I'm not so sure after I've seen some top students get rejected, not even waitlisted. And these are students who I would put as locks to get admitted.

If they are truly top students, they don’t need TJ. They will be fine in their local high schools. Top private schools would love to have them as well. The world doesn’t stop because they got passed over by TJ.


Makes one miss the good old days where you just buy access to the test and you were in but all this equity ensuring all students get a fair shot makes it so much more competitive and difficult


So pathetically predictable parroting #BackDoorKaren #TestBuyingKaren


I know she's always going on about the good old days. Well those days of test buying are gone and kids now have to compete based on actual merit.


No one believes you, TJAAG parrot. TJ is a joke now.

LOL!!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The “fourth tier” posters remind me of Trump. People say it. Many, many people. Fourth tier. The real superstars are staying at Carson. Spread the word. (I look forward to your justifications in four years about how Harvard is a dump for the stupidest people, the very stupidest. Fifth tier, they say. None of the top shelf students got in.


Nah, it's the person who talks about test buying- 'I hire all the best people.'


Except the test buying happened. It's well-documented in many threads here, but sure some would like to keep these inconvenient facts under wraps and pretend the old system was based on merit.


“Documented by n multiple threads” - all by one loser intentionally spreading malicious misinformation


Nope. Curie posted the first and last names of their students who were admitted. Those same students have gone public on TJ Vents on Facebook in the comment threads to confirm the entire story.

It may be posted maliciously, but it’s 100% true and confirmed. And it implicates about 70% of the South Asian students in TJ’s class of 2024, given that Curie virtually exclusively serves Indian families.


Thanks for the nice laugh! "100% true and confirmed" you say on an anonymous internet message board!!

What about Area 51? Confirmed aliens as well I would guess.



The Curie story has evidence and, again, has been confirmed by its own students on TJ message boards where the students had nothing to gain by implicating themselves.

Comparing it to some sort of wild conspiracy theory may serve your narrative, but it's not appropriate in this situation.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
If they are truly top students, they don’t need TJ. They will be fine in their local high schools. Top private schools would love to have them as well. The world doesn’t stop because they got passed over by TJ.


Sure they will do fine. However, these are also the students most likely to take advantage of the extra opportunities available at TJ. They could be taking calculus in 9th grade and harder classes without the need for college enrollment or online classes, the physics class that college professors come to observe, etc.
It seems strange that these students were rejected outright.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Diversity and equity over iq


You mean prep > IQ

You mean cheating and prep > IQ


I find your implication that TJ classes (with high percentage of asians) admitted under the old system cheat more than the classes (less asians, more racial diversity) admitted under the new system laughable. Do you think white/black/latinx students don't cheat? I have kids at both TJ and base school, and I can say there is more cheating happening in our base school. My base school Asian DC has been asked multiple times by white peers what was on an exam or if DC remembered his answers.


Observation at my kid's school is that they still took Asian students, but ones who were of less ability. Possibly ones who went to Curie and got prepped for the essay.
Anonymous
My son (in AAP) didn’t apply but his two good friends didn’t get in. I think it’s TJ’s loss, our base school’s gain. I don’t think TJ is going to keep its cache. I already didn’t think my son should apply.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:My son (in AAP) didn’t apply but his two good friends didn’t get in. I think it’s TJ’s loss, our base school’s gain. I don’t think TJ is going to keep its cache. I already didn’t think my son should apply.


Cachet. Sorry for the typo.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The “fourth tier” posters remind me of Trump. People say it. Many, many people. Fourth tier. The real superstars are staying at Carson. Spread the word. (I look forward to your justifications in four years about how Harvard is a dump for the stupidest people, the very stupidest. Fifth tier, they say. None of the top shelf students got in.


Nah, it's the person who talks about test buying- 'I hire all the best people.'


Except the test buying happened. It's well-documented in many threads here, but sure some would like to keep these inconvenient facts under wraps and pretend the old system was based on merit.


“Documented by n multiple threads” - all by one loser intentionally spreading malicious misinformation


Nope. Curie posted the first and last names of their students who were admitted. Those same students have gone public on TJ Vents on Facebook in the comment threads to confirm the entire story.

It may be posted maliciously, but it’s 100% true and confirmed. And it implicates about 70% of the South Asian students in TJ’s class of 2024, given that Curie virtually exclusively serves Indian families.


Thanks for the nice laugh! "100% true and confirmed" you say on an anonymous internet message board!!

What about Area 51? Confirmed aliens as well I would guess.



The Curie story has evidence and, again, has been confirmed by its own students on TJ message boards where the students had nothing to gain by implicating themselves.

Comparing it to some sort of wild conspiracy theory may serve your narrative, but it's not appropriate in this situation.


They try awful hard to cover this up. I think it's because they want to pretend the previous selection was based on merit instead of the rigged game that it really was.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The “fourth tier” posters remind me of Trump. People say it. Many, many people. Fourth tier. The real superstars are staying at Carson. Spread the word. (I look forward to your justifications in four years about how Harvard is a dump for the stupidest people, the very stupidest. Fifth tier, they say. None of the top shelf students got in.


Nah, it's the person who talks about test buying- 'I hire all the best people.'


Except the test buying happened. It's well-documented in many threads here, but sure some would like to keep these inconvenient facts under wraps and pretend the old system was based on merit.


“Documented by n multiple threads” - all by one loser intentionally spreading malicious misinformation


Nope. Curie posted the first and last names of their students who were admitted. Those same students have gone public on TJ Vents on Facebook in the comment threads to confirm the entire story.

It may be posted maliciously, but it’s 100% true and confirmed. And it implicates about 70% of the South Asian students in TJ’s class of 2024, given that Curie virtually exclusively serves Indian families.


Thanks for the nice laugh! "100% true and confirmed" you say on an anonymous internet message board!!

What about Area 51? Confirmed aliens as well I would guess.



The Curie story has evidence and, again, has been confirmed by its own students on TJ message boards where the students had nothing to gain by implicating themselves.

Comparing it to some sort of wild conspiracy theory may serve your narrative, but it's not appropriate in this situation.


They try awful hard to cover this up. I think it's because they want to pretend the previous selection was based on merit instead of the rigged game that it really was.


PP - I think it's unfair to characterize the entire classes as benefiting from a "rigged game" as you indicate, but the Curie situation absolutely had a huge impact on admissions for a brief moment there.

It's also a little bit unfair to characterize - as many have - that the parents who registered their students for Curie's boutique $5,000 TJ Prep course were "buying the answers to the test". I certainly don't believe that they knew that that's what they were doing.

But what is confirmed by evidence is that TJ students who had attended Curie noted that, when they sat for the notoriously challenging, time-intensive, and theoretically "secured" Quant-Q exam, that they noticed problems on the exam that they had seen - word for word - in their time at Curie.

It's a standard practice for exam distributors to re-use some questions on different forms of the exam year over year, and in this instance, the only explanation of how Curie would have been able to present identical longform word-problem-style questions to their students is if they had been reported back by the previous students who had taken the exam. To put it another way, it's fairly obvious based on the evidence that Curie students took the Quant-Q for the Classes of 2022 or 2023, reported the questions back to Curie in violation of the agreement that they signed on the exam day, which Curie then used to develop their own question bank.

This is a problem because the entire purpose of the Quant-Q exam is to evaluate a student's ability to solve problems of types that they've never seen before, which is why it has been used historically to evaluate potential applicants for high-level CS programs and the like. Nearly every problem on the Quant-Q can be solved through some sort of lengthy calculation process, but there are also ways to synthesize the information in the question to come to a much quicker solution - and time is a major factor on that exam.

By teaching their students how to identify and solve the different types of problems presented by the Quant-Q exam, Curie not only created an artificially high standard for students to achieve in order to get to the percentile score necessary to qualify for TJ's semifinalist designation - they essentially rendered the exam useless in evaluating their students.

I've seen the exam. The problem types are remarkably easy if you are either an exceptional problem solver or if you have already been taught how to solve them. But if you're not familiar with them already, they're going to be very challenging and require you to develop a method for solving them quickly and on the fly, which makes it a valuable tool for evaluating students to attend a school like TJ.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
It's a standard practice for exam distributors to re-use some questions on different forms of the exam year over year, and in this instance, the only explanation of how Curie would have been able to present identical longform word-problem-style questions to their students is if they had been reported back by the previous students who had taken the exam. To put it another way, it's fairly obvious based on the evidence that Curie students took the Quant-Q for the Classes of 2022 or 2023, reported the questions back to Curie in violation of the agreement that they signed on the exam day, which Curie then used to develop their own question bank.


That is not obvious. Consider another detail mentioned. Curie posted the names of the students who were accepted. This is a common action taken by coaching centres in India, publishing top ranks in the newspaper to get more parents paying tuition for their kids. Some of these centres flip it around and pay top students to come there so they will be able to publish their names when they get a top rank. It's all about getting more registrations.
Something else that frequently happens, the coaching centres acquire the actual exams beforehand, bribing some official or another. Just this month, it came out that the exam papers leaked in Andhra, and they canceled the exam.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I have heard some superstars, who were winning STEM awards at the state level, were getting rejected. And it had nothing to do with bad grades as others here like to claim.


This was true at our feeder school.


Same here. All kids know it. 7th graders are even told not to mention any STEM achievements in essays. The so called “top 1.5%” is fake when there is no clear standards.


+1. Also know a kid from traditional feeder school who is a STEM super star with multiple awards at regional, state, and national level. Was put to "wait pool".


That didn't happen. But congrats on driving your narrative.



NP here. It did happen at two feeders I know about. Seriously, what is TJ admissions doing? They are sabotaging the school. From the outside, it looks intentional.


Absolutely, I heard kids are saying that those very top students are rejected on purpose so that those Unqualified but admitted won’ t look so bad at TJ.


Did you hear this from Q or just when you take off the tinfoil hat?


Lady you need to get out of the VR/AR world and look at the data. Close to 10% of the class of 2025 has moved out (including 2 in March). I do not believe that the TJ admission is deliberately rejecting the top students but certainly the data points they have to identify the top students need to be re-visited (at least include some achievements, teacher recommendations etc. in addition to grades and essays)


I'm not so sure after I've seen some top students get rejected, not even waitlisted. And these are students who I would put as locks to get admitted.

If they are truly top students, they don’t need TJ. They will be fine in their local high schools. Top private schools would love to have them as well. The world doesn’t stop because they got passed over by TJ.


Makes one miss the good old days where you just buy access to the test and you were in but all this equity ensuring all students get a fair shot makes it so much more competitive and difficult


So pathetically predictable parroting #BackDoorKaren #TestBuyingKaren

We're not talking about borderline kids who were boosted by Curie or another prep center. Those kids generally got on the waitlist, some were accepted. Many superstars who did not go to Curie were rejected outright.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:My son (in AAP) didn’t apply but his two good friends didn’t get in. I think it’s TJ’s loss, our base school’s gain. I don’t think TJ is going to keep its cache. I already didn’t think my son should apply.


"This place is so popular, nobody goes there anymore."
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My son (in AAP) didn’t apply but his two good friends didn’t get in. I think it’s TJ’s loss, our base school’s gain. I don’t think TJ is going to keep its cache. I already didn’t think my son should apply.


"This place is so popular, nobody goes there anymore."


“Applications are flat and nowhere near their peak.”
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The “fourth tier” posters remind me of Trump. People say it. Many, many people. Fourth tier. The real superstars are staying at Carson. Spread the word. (I look forward to your justifications in four years about how Harvard is a dump for the stupidest people, the very stupidest. Fifth tier, they say. None of the top shelf students got in.


Nah, it's the person who talks about test buying- 'I hire all the best people.'


Except the test buying happened. It's well-documented in many threads here, but sure some would like to keep these inconvenient facts under wraps and pretend the old system was based on merit.


“Documented by n multiple threads” - all by one loser intentionally spreading malicious misinformation


Nope. Curie posted the first and last names of their students who were admitted. Those same students have gone public on TJ Vents on Facebook in the comment threads to confirm the entire story.

It may be posted maliciously, but it’s 100% true and confirmed. And it implicates about 70% of the South Asian students in TJ’s class of 2024, given that Curie virtually exclusively serves Indian families.


Thanks for the nice laugh! "100% true and confirmed" you say on an anonymous internet message board!!

What about Area 51? Confirmed aliens as well I would guess.



The Curie story has evidence and, again, has been confirmed by its own students on TJ message boards where the students had nothing to gain by implicating themselves.

Comparing it to some sort of wild conspiracy theory may serve your narrative, but it's not appropriate in this situation.


They try awful hard to cover this up. I think it's because they want to pretend the previous selection was based on merit instead of the rigged game that it really was.


PP - I think it's unfair to characterize the entire classes as benefiting from a "rigged game" as you indicate, but the Curie situation absolutely had a huge impact on admissions for a brief moment there.

It's also a little bit unfair to characterize - as many have - that the parents who registered their students for Curie's boutique $5,000 TJ Prep course were "buying the answers to the test". I certainly don't believe that they knew that that's what they were doing.

But what is confirmed by evidence is that TJ students who had attended Curie noted that, when they sat for the notoriously challenging, time-intensive, and theoretically "secured" Quant-Q exam, that they noticed problems on the exam that they had seen - word for word - in their time at Curie.

It's a standard practice for exam distributors to re-use some questions on different forms of the exam year over year, and in this instance, the only explanation of how Curie would have been able to present identical longform word-problem-style questions to their students is if they had been reported back by the previous students who had taken the exam. To put it another way, it's fairly obvious based on the evidence that Curie students took the Quant-Q for the Classes of 2022 or 2023, reported the questions back to Curie in violation of the agreement that they signed on the exam day, which Curie then used to develop their own question bank.

This is a problem because the entire purpose of the Quant-Q exam is to evaluate a student's ability to solve problems of types that they've never seen before, which is why it has been used historically to evaluate potential applicants for high-level CS programs and the like. Nearly every problem on the Quant-Q can be solved through some sort of lengthy calculation process, but there are also ways to synthesize the information in the question to come to a much quicker solution - and time is a major factor on that exam.

By teaching their students how to identify and solve the different types of problems presented by the Quant-Q exam, Curie not only created an artificially high standard for students to achieve in order to get to the percentile score necessary to qualify for TJ's semifinalist designation - they essentially rendered the exam useless in evaluating their students.

I've seen the exam. The problem types are remarkably easy if you are either an exceptional problem solver or if you have already been taught how to solve them. But if you're not familiar with them already, they're going to be very challenging and require you to develop a method for solving them quickly and on the fly, which makes it a valuable tool for evaluating students to attend a school like TJ.


Perhaps it's unfair but the ad that Curie took out listed the names of 33% of the TJ entering class as having been their customers. Further, I'm sure they weren't the only prep center to do this sort of thing so I would imagine the number of students who benefited from this was greater than 50%.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I have heard some superstars, who were winning STEM awards at the state level, were getting rejected. And it had nothing to do with bad grades as others here like to claim.


This was true at our feeder school.


Same here. All kids know it. 7th graders are even told not to mention any STEM achievements in essays. The so called “top 1.5%” is fake when there is no clear standards.


+1. Also know a kid from traditional feeder school who is a STEM super star with multiple awards at regional, state, and national level. Was put to "wait pool".


That didn't happen. But congrats on driving your narrative.



NP here. It did happen at two feeders I know about. Seriously, what is TJ admissions doing? They are sabotaging the school. From the outside, it looks intentional.


Absolutely, I heard kids are saying that those very top students are rejected on purpose so that those Unqualified but admitted won’ t look so bad at TJ.


Did you hear this from Q or just when you take off the tinfoil hat?


Lady you need to get out of the VR/AR world and look at the data. Close to 10% of the class of 2025 has moved out (including 2 in March). I do not believe that the TJ admission is deliberately rejecting the top students but certainly the data points they have to identify the top students need to be re-visited (at least include some achievements, teacher recommendations etc. in addition to grades and essays)


I'm not so sure after I've seen some top students get rejected, not even waitlisted. And these are students who I would put as locks to get admitted.

If they are truly top students, they don’t need TJ. They will be fine in their local high schools. Top private schools would love to have them as well. The world doesn’t stop because they got passed over by TJ.


Makes one miss the good old days where you just buy access to the test and you were in but all this equity ensuring all students get a fair shot makes it so much more competitive and difficult


So pathetically predictable parroting #BackDoorKaren #TestBuyingKaren


We're not talking about borderline kids who were boosted by Curie or another prep center. Those kids generally got on the waitlist, some were accepted. Many superstars who did not go to Curie were rejected outright.

Lol. Your expectations are too high from a parrot
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My son (in AAP) didn’t apply but his two good friends didn’t get in. I think it’s TJ’s loss, our base school’s gain. I don’t think TJ is going to keep its cache. I already didn’t think my son should apply.


"This place is so popular, nobody goes there anymore."


“Applications are flat and nowhere near their peak.”


I know my nephew who is a URM a half-dozen years ago turned TJ down. They felt others assumed they only got in because of affirmative action. They later ended up at a T10 school.
Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Go to: