Anonymous wrote:This thread has gotten super weird.
It sure did. It seems like relatives/friends/coworkers of everyone involved are posting here.
As someone who hasn't followed this saga closely, I only have two things to say.
First, if the husband and the au pair staged the entire event together to get rid of the wife thinking they can both get away with it, they are delusional, and the guy being in law enforcement must have known it. And second, if the deceased wife was into BDSM for real, she would have made different arrangements. The dude that got shot looks creepy and not like the sharpest tool in the shed. Would a married professional nurse invite this guy over to her house to lightly stab her in the neck for sexual gratification at 7 30 am on a Tuesday morning while her 4-year-old and her nanny were out at the zoo watching pandas?
I think the husband set everyone up in order to get rid of the wife and blame the nanny. So far it's been working...
I was a friend of Joe, he was very bright by the way, and not creepy at all. Was he a sort of hippy-nerd, yes, but that doesn't make him a creep for having sexual fetishes. Do I think the rest of what you said is my opinion also? yes, dead on about everything accept my friend, he was a good guy!
Im also sure that many people involved with the crime can be reading this forum and some writing in it because its location based and also if you google the murder this forum discussion comes right up.
Cristina Corbin here with ABC News 20/20. Looking to speak with anyone who knew Brendan and Christine well (off the record) and any details about their relationship. cristina.corbin@abc.com. Anonymity guaranteed. Thank you.
Anonymous wrote:Just a reminder what was posted pg 142 from someone who attended the bond hearing:
AP had a bond hearing on Tuesday.
Here is what happened.
Defense and Prosecutor entered several pieces of evidence. Including:
- A copy of the chats between CB and JR was entered under seal
- Multiple pictures of the scene were entered, many under seal.
Defense's Argument
- Prosecutor previously "misstated" that AP had bought plane tickets using her passport.
- She actually had used to apply for a work visa and student visa. AP was legally in the country at the time of her arrest with no intention of leaving.
- Prosecutor has not provided any actual evidence of a conspiracy. Just public statements.
- AP was actively dating multiple people, did not deny relationship with BB during police interview, but mentioned she was dating several people.
- Prosecutor overstated extent of JR's incapacitation from first shot. The Medical Examiner stated that there was possibility that JR could see and move.
Prosecutor's Argument
- Prosecutor surprised Defense with a document showing that ICE has asked to be notified if she is release from custody, and they have a warrant for her. He is afraid that if she is released and ends up in federal custody, they will deport her.
- Prosecutor stated that there is no extradition treaty with Brazil, and that the Feds do not have to acknowledge the case's priority. Feds could just deport AP and then the state of VA has no control.
- Prosecutor also argued that she is manipulative and can be manipulated, and therefore still a danger.
- Displayed a picture of JR's body. JR was clutching his stomach on his back
- Mainly re-iterated things said previously at preliminary hearing.
- Mentioned that BB took the 5th on every question during prelim.
Other facts that came out (from chat transcripts and other things referred to by both sides)
- CB and JR communicated using Fetlife and Telegram.
- JR brought up the idea of bringing a knife, CB asked about the details.
- They discussed blood play (cutting)
- CB asked JR, "Do you still want to tear off my clothes? I have a set of old pajamas you can tear"
- A set of ripped pajamas was recovered from the scene
- Pics of a knife, ropes, chains, rubber restraints were sent by JR to CB
- CB took selfie in a bathing suit and sent to husband. A few hours later sent the same selfie to JR with caption: "I sent this to my husband and he didn't even notice I lost 20 pounds"
- Judge questioned about the 45 min phone call over telegram that occurred between CB and JR
- After the phone call, JR texted: "It was great hearing your sexy voice"
- JR wrote that he had only done blood play once before, with razor blades
- CB had several superficial cuts that barely broke the skin
- JR was in the process of cutting CB with BB walked in
- CB wrote "trip to the zoo" on calendar
- CB had multiple lacerations to her neck and carotid artery. Three lacerations to the right side of her neck were the most likely the cause of death
- In the second 911 call, (mentioned but not played) BB is trying to save CB's life by applying pressure
Judge's Decision
Denied bond for two reasons.
- First, that FCPD could lose jurisdiction/control if the Feds take custody and/or deport
- Second, that AP could still pose a risk to community.
You got a few things wrong to say the least. The police believe that Christine's profile was not of her own creation or even knowledge. It was created by brendan. Another thing you got wrong is whom ever Joe was speaking with and it appears now it was brendan using a voice app to change his voice asked Joe to get a knife, and brought up blood play. That was NOT Joe at all. They then asked after he had it would he take a photo of it and send it. They were setting this entire thing up to make him take the fall. In court the prosecutor and the coroner did NOT over state Joe's condition and capacity after the first shot. Both shots were progressive death shots which means either or both killed him, this was explained in the hearing by the sworn coroner. It was always stated by Juliana that she shot Joe from eight or ten feet away as he laid on the floor. He was not up and moving, he was not killing Christine, as Christine as likely all ready stabbed by Brendan before Joe ever arrived at the house. Your story is just that a story and not the facts of the case. They are not the facts of what laid out in court, you are misleading people on the forum and you are very confused or your purposes are nefarious. It is clear however to most that hear the actual facts of this case that Brendan executed a plan plan to lure Joe Ryan in, to use him as a fall guy for the murder of his wife Christine, and than to kill Joe to secure an alibi. Juliana had a part, she is guilty also of murdering Joe, and aiding Branden in the murder of his own wife, and covering up. Let's all remember what Brendan's job was. He is law enforcement for the IRS and understood computer forensics and how to commit a murder. When the trial happens for Juliana I hope more comes out and that law enforcement finally have enough information to make the crime stick. I would not want to live in his neighborhood either. He is clearly a danger, but the prosecution must make it stick that he killed his wife and also framed Joe. This will take a boat load of evidence and ideally Juliana will figure out her lover used her also as a means to an end. I am confident that one day Christine and Joe will have justice for their murders.
Were you at the hearing, yes or no? If no, then why is your story more valid than someone who attended the hearing? There is a lot of message board speculation in your story and the fact remains that Brendan is not charged.
That being said, the person who posted on pg 142 could be making things up.
What is certain is that IF the post on pg 142 is an accurate your story where, Brendan masterminded all this, becomes harder to believe. Is it believable that:
-Brendan made a fake Christine account
-Brendan used either Christine's devices or untraceable messages to con Joe without Christine becoming aware
-Brendan convinced Joe to act out of character and introduce the idea knife play and bring a knife
-Brendan used a voice changing app to sound "sexy" and fool Joe into thinking he was Christine
-Brendan got Christine naked and ripped her pajamas
-Brendan's plan was to leave the house and have Joe arrive with Christine alive but unaware Joe was coming
-Brendan worked out the timing so precisely that au pair leaves, Joe arrives, Joe goes to the bedroom, au pair returns, calls Brendan who arrives after Joe is in the house but before Christine is aware Joe is in the house
That's an amazing story and it will be interesting to see how much of your theory holds true.
Yes I was at the hearing, and yes I know about the case. I also want to point out the original poster for whatever reason list things the prosecution said as if they are not facts and then lists what the defense has said as if they are facts of the case. They are not facts of the case they are things the poster said are facts. The police and prosecution have laid out what they believe was a murder plot to kill Christine and use Joe as the pawn. They have said this out right in court. That’s why part of the evidence presented were photos of the couple, Julianna and Brendan on the night stand in their now shared bedroom of the dead woman and wife Christine. This is very valid evidence and it was allowed in and considered by the court even when the defense attempted to toss it out. Who ever wrote this write up missed many things in the court that day, or intentionally are attempting to make information or facts very unclear. The only reason I can reason why they would mislead others is they want you to think a certain way, or they are not observement. The time line they can facts are not according to the police or the prosecutor. Joe did not own a knife, he bought one at the urging of who he thought he was speaking with. Was that really Christine, not likely, that is NOT what the police believe. Let me point out that the police have thought of Joseph Ryan other then a victim. From the very first press conference to now. That is why Julianna was charged, and that is why I believe Brendan will one day be arrested and charged with two murders. Read over what the poster said, it isn’t what was said in the earlier hearing at all, it is from a perspective they want you to believe based on a story Julianna or Brendan are saying. Yes the person from the IRS criminal investigation team knows how to create a murder plan, but he messed up in places thats why there are several phone calls to 911 and that Julianna didn’t do all the shooting alone that they both had to because one shot was not enough to kill joe their pawn. Brendan has a gun already, if he is shooting someone that just stabbed his wife would he ask the nanny to go into a safe to shoot him again while he is laying on the floor with a shot in his head? Don’t believe everything you read, details matter and motivation matters also. I am stating the story from the perspective of law enforcement that have no motivation other than the truth and the safety of community. If they didn’t care they wouldn’t have taken the time to fully investigate, nor would it be taking time to arrest the other half of the murder team.
First point of clarification, the poster at the top of the page referred to pg 142 of this thread when it was really on pg 144
If I understand you, you were at the hearing but didn't post the details of what was said at the hearing within the thread. If you did I'd be happy to review it.
The post of pg 144 provided new things to consider and certainly complicate things if true. In that accounting on pg 144 by a different poster make it seem that Joe and Christine talked on the phone prior to the murder, Joe introduced knife play, and that she was nude when he arrived with the scene staged as planned in message exchanges with Joe.
Are you saying that:
A. The defense did introduced these things in the hearing and you don't believe they are true
B. The poster on page 144 is lying and the defense did not introduce these things
I am saying B the defense did NOT introduce this at the hearing. The hearing is short, as in a few hours. I think it was three perhaps. I dont remember the exact amount. During the hearing the prosecution lays out just enough evidence and witnesses to get the case to move forward. The case is not a full case it's a fast process. Witnesses called on the prosecution's side. It's all about their burden of proof to proceed so none of this would have been during the pre trial hearing. Only details more or less of how the prosecution intended to try to present a case. I have no idea why the poster got that wrong with listing facts that were not facts or even speculation on the prosecutions part. I stated I dont know how they were so confused and misrepresented what actually happened in court, or if they intentionally were motivated to sway an audience online. I would prefer not to say they lied because it suggests I know their motives. I can't speak to that, I can only speak to the what the prosecution presented and what I recall from the defense. I have a good understanding of this case, I was at the hearing, and I am clear headed and have good observational skills.
Why did I not post sooner when I read the original post or why do I not post more often in this forum about the case? I fear I will slip up and give information that might be harmful to Joe and Christine getting justice. I however do not want to go down as to have not stood up publicly either and say some of what I know. It's a fine line and it creates great stress to be careful and closed mouthed while still supporting the victims and wanting the killers to pay for their crimes.
Interesting that the other poster would be so specific. I'm disappointed if they made up those facts to confuse things.
I believe there have been multiple hearings (maybe 3?). How many have you attended and which one are you speaking of?
The 142/144 post was a summary from the BOND hearing which was closed to the public on April 2.
it seems like both of these posters are talking about a different court date and hearing. I assume thats why there was a different take on what happened. In that case during the bond hearing which was closed to the public the original poster wasn't present either unless they are part of the defense team. So it's still completely from the defense stand point where they talk about whatever details they claimed are facts but are really just one sided. The other poster said he or she went to the prosecution's evidentiary hearing where the prosecution presents only the facts needed to bring the case to an actual jury hearing, and in that type of hearing the defense legally can only object but can not give testimony at all as here is ZERO cross questioning allowed. It's important when viewing this case being aware of what "real facts" are proven scientific verified evidence, and what credible witness testimony tells us should be what we consider as facts. Not stories given by people that refused to be interviewed by the police after a murder occurred, or people that hung up on a 911 call while letting people bleed out, or people that purchased guns 3 weeks before a gun murder, or people having an affair before and after that murder and than sleeping in the same bedroom as the murdered woman slept while alive.
Some news outlets were at the bond hearing.
Do you think a reporter made that one sided post in this forum calling things facts that are not??? I don't believe that!
It didn't seem like a reporter posted it but I wouldn't call it one sided. It is either false or it introduces new information that complicates an already complicated case.
when testimony from the defense is presented as facts rather than testimony than it is biased and not remotely facts. Facts are provable things based on concrete evidence, or from eye witnesses that are reliable or professional. Since the information was given as if it was fact and cleverly crafted I still think it comes from one source. That source is obvious to me, its not a reporter, they have no reason to try to sway public opinion, or to personally insult others that challenge what was said about it still smacks of someone that is intentionally misleading others about what facts are, and what occurred in the hearing.
I saw a horrible post deleted by moderators here I assume. It was there for an hour and then gone. It referenced mocking Joe's mother, it used her actual name. Why would anyone post that? sick sick sick! I think only one person or perhaps two would do this.
Of note, LE has consistently referred to both JOE and CHRISTINE as VICTIMS since they day they were brutally murdered. Mocking the grieving mother of a crime victim is sick and sadistic. Of course, if smearing Joe doesn't work, we all know where that leads. Tick tock!
I firmly want justice for Christine and believe her husband was involved, and I do believe Joe was innocent here, BUT that’s not proven by the fact that he was called a victim. Even if he were in the wrong, he was Shot by two different people which makes him victim.
Anonymous wrote:Just a reminder what was posted pg 142 from someone who attended the bond hearing:
AP had a bond hearing on Tuesday.
Here is what happened.
Defense and Prosecutor entered several pieces of evidence. Including:
- A copy of the chats between CB and JR was entered under seal
- Multiple pictures of the scene were entered, many under seal.
Defense's Argument
- Prosecutor previously "misstated" that AP had bought plane tickets using her passport.
- She actually had used to apply for a work visa and student visa. AP was legally in the country at the time of her arrest with no intention of leaving.
- Prosecutor has not provided any actual evidence of a conspiracy. Just public statements.
- AP was actively dating multiple people, did not deny relationship with BB during police interview, but mentioned she was dating several people.
- Prosecutor overstated extent of JR's incapacitation from first shot. The Medical Examiner stated that there was possibility that JR could see and move.
Prosecutor's Argument
- Prosecutor surprised Defense with a document showing that ICE has asked to be notified if she is release from custody, and they have a warrant for her. He is afraid that if she is released and ends up in federal custody, they will deport her.
- Prosecutor stated that there is no extradition treaty with Brazil, and that the Feds do not have to acknowledge the case's priority. Feds could just deport AP and then the state of VA has no control.
- Prosecutor also argued that she is manipulative and can be manipulated, and therefore still a danger.
- Displayed a picture of JR's body. JR was clutching his stomach on his back
- Mainly re-iterated things said previously at preliminary hearing.
- Mentioned that BB took the 5th on every question during prelim.
Other facts that came out (from chat transcripts and other things referred to by both sides)
- CB and JR communicated using Fetlife and Telegram.
- JR brought up the idea of bringing a knife, CB asked about the details.
- They discussed blood play (cutting)
- CB asked JR, "Do you still want to tear off my clothes? I have a set of old pajamas you can tear"
- A set of ripped pajamas was recovered from the scene
- Pics of a knife, ropes, chains, rubber restraints were sent by JR to CB
- CB took selfie in a bathing suit and sent to husband. A few hours later sent the same selfie to JR with caption: "I sent this to my husband and he didn't even notice I lost 20 pounds"
- Judge questioned about the 45 min phone call over telegram that occurred between CB and JR
- After the phone call, JR texted: "It was great hearing your sexy voice"
- JR wrote that he had only done blood play once before, with razor blades
- CB had several superficial cuts that barely broke the skin
- JR was in the process of cutting CB with BB walked in
- CB wrote "trip to the zoo" on calendar
- CB had multiple lacerations to her neck and carotid artery. Three lacerations to the right side of her neck were the most likely the cause of death
- In the second 911 call, (mentioned but not played) BB is trying to save CB's life by applying pressure
Judge's Decision
Denied bond for two reasons.
- First, that FCPD could lose jurisdiction/control if the Feds take custody and/or deport
- Second, that AP could still pose a risk to community.
You got a few things wrong to say the least. The police believe that Christine's profile was not of her own creation or even knowledge. It was created by brendan. Another thing you got wrong is whom ever Joe was speaking with and it appears now it was brendan using a voice app to change his voice asked Joe to get a knife, and brought up blood play. That was NOT Joe at all. They then asked after he had it would he take a photo of it and send it. They were setting this entire thing up to make him take the fall. In court the prosecutor and the coroner did NOT over state Joe's condition and capacity after the first shot. Both shots were progressive death shots which means either or both killed him, this was explained in the hearing by the sworn coroner. It was always stated by Juliana that she shot Joe from eight or ten feet away as he laid on the floor. He was not up and moving, he was not killing Christine, as Christine as likely all ready stabbed by Brendan before Joe ever arrived at the house. Your story is just that a story and not the facts of the case. They are not the facts of what laid out in court, you are misleading people on the forum and you are very confused or your purposes are nefarious. It is clear however to most that hear the actual facts of this case that Brendan executed a plan plan to lure Joe Ryan in, to use him as a fall guy for the murder of his wife Christine, and than to kill Joe to secure an alibi. Juliana had a part, she is guilty also of murdering Joe, and aiding Branden in the murder of his own wife, and covering up. Let's all remember what Brendan's job was. He is law enforcement for the IRS and understood computer forensics and how to commit a murder. When the trial happens for Juliana I hope more comes out and that law enforcement finally have enough information to make the crime stick. I would not want to live in his neighborhood either. He is clearly a danger, but the prosecution must make it stick that he killed his wife and also framed Joe. This will take a boat load of evidence and ideally Juliana will figure out her lover used her also as a means to an end. I am confident that one day Christine and Joe will have justice for their murders.
Were you at the hearing, yes or no? If no, then why is your story more valid than someone who attended the hearing? There is a lot of message board speculation in your story and the fact remains that Brendan is not charged.
That being said, the person who posted on pg 142 could be making things up.
What is certain is that IF the post on pg 142 is an accurate your story where, Brendan masterminded all this, becomes harder to believe. Is it believable that:
-Brendan made a fake Christine account
-Brendan used either Christine's devices or untraceable messages to con Joe without Christine becoming aware
-Brendan convinced Joe to act out of character and introduce the idea knife play and bring a knife
-Brendan used a voice changing app to sound "sexy" and fool Joe into thinking he was Christine
-Brendan got Christine naked and ripped her pajamas
-Brendan's plan was to leave the house and have Joe arrive with Christine alive but unaware Joe was coming
-Brendan worked out the timing so precisely that au pair leaves, Joe arrives, Joe goes to the bedroom, au pair returns, calls Brendan who arrives after Joe is in the house but before Christine is aware Joe is in the house
That's an amazing story and it will be interesting to see how much of your theory holds true.
Yes I was at the hearing, and yes I know about the case. I also want to point out the original poster for whatever reason list things the prosecution said as if they are not facts and then lists what the defense has said as if they are facts of the case. They are not facts of the case they are things the poster said are facts. The police and prosecution have laid out what they believe was a murder plot to kill Christine and use Joe as the pawn. They have said this out right in court. That’s why part of the evidence presented were photos of the couple, Julianna and Brendan on the night stand in their now shared bedroom of the dead woman and wife Christine. This is very valid evidence and it was allowed in and considered by the court even when the defense attempted to toss it out. Who ever wrote this write up missed many things in the court that day, or intentionally are attempting to make information or facts very unclear. The only reason I can reason why they would mislead others is they want you to think a certain way, or they are not observement. The time line they can facts are not according to the police or the prosecutor. Joe did not own a knife, he bought one at the urging of who he thought he was speaking with. Was that really Christine, not likely, that is NOT what the police believe. Let me point out that the police have thought of Joseph Ryan other then a victim. From the very first press conference to now. That is why Julianna was charged, and that is why I believe Brendan will one day be arrested and charged with two murders. Read over what the poster said, it isn’t what was said in the earlier hearing at all, it is from a perspective they want you to believe based on a story Julianna or Brendan are saying. Yes the person from the IRS criminal investigation team knows how to create a murder plan, but he messed up in places thats why there are several phone calls to 911 and that Julianna didn’t do all the shooting alone that they both had to because one shot was not enough to kill joe their pawn. Brendan has a gun already, if he is shooting someone that just stabbed his wife would he ask the nanny to go into a safe to shoot him again while he is laying on the floor with a shot in his head? Don’t believe everything you read, details matter and motivation matters also. I am stating the story from the perspective of law enforcement that have no motivation other than the truth and the safety of community. If they didn’t care they wouldn’t have taken the time to fully investigate, nor would it be taking time to arrest the other half of the murder team.
First point of clarification, the poster at the top of the page referred to pg 142 of this thread when it was really on pg 144
If I understand you, you were at the hearing but didn't post the details of what was said at the hearing within the thread. If you did I'd be happy to review it.
The post of pg 144 provided new things to consider and certainly complicate things if true. In that accounting on pg 144 by a different poster make it seem that Joe and Christine talked on the phone prior to the murder, Joe introduced knife play, and that she was nude when he arrived with the scene staged as planned in message exchanges with Joe.
Are you saying that:
A. The defense did introduced these things in the hearing and you don't believe they are true
B. The poster on page 144 is lying and the defense did not introduce these things
I am saying B the defense did NOT introduce this at the hearing. The hearing is short, as in a few hours. I think it was three perhaps. I dont remember the exact amount. During the hearing the prosecution lays out just enough evidence and witnesses to get the case to move forward. The case is not a full case it's a fast process. Witnesses called on the prosecution's side. It's all about their burden of proof to proceed so none of this would have been during the pre trial hearing. Only details more or less of how the prosecution intended to try to present a case. I have no idea why the poster got that wrong with listing facts that were not facts or even speculation on the prosecutions part. I stated I dont know how they were so confused and misrepresented what actually happened in court, or if they intentionally were motivated to sway an audience online. I would prefer not to say they lied because it suggests I know their motives. I can't speak to that, I can only speak to the what the prosecution presented and what I recall from the defense. I have a good understanding of this case, I was at the hearing, and I am clear headed and have good observational skills.
Why did I not post sooner when I read the original post or why do I not post more often in this forum about the case? I fear I will slip up and give information that might be harmful to Joe and Christine getting justice. I however do not want to go down as to have not stood up publicly either and say some of what I know. It's a fine line and it creates great stress to be careful and closed mouthed while still supporting the victims and wanting the killers to pay for their crimes.
Interesting that the other poster would be so specific. I'm disappointed if they made up those facts to confuse things.
I believe there have been multiple hearings (maybe 3?). How many have you attended and which one are you speaking of?
The 142/144 post was a summary from the BOND hearing which was closed to the public on April 2.
it seems like both of these posters are talking about a different court date and hearing. I assume thats why there was a different take on what happened. In that case during the bond hearing which was closed to the public the original poster wasn't present either unless they are part of the defense team. So it's still completely from the defense stand point where they talk about whatever details they claimed are facts but are really just one sided. The other poster said he or she went to the prosecution's evidentiary hearing where the prosecution presents only the facts needed to bring the case to an actual jury hearing, and in that type of hearing the defense legally can only object but can not give testimony at all as here is ZERO cross questioning allowed. It's important when viewing this case being aware of what "real facts" are proven scientific verified evidence, and what credible witness testimony tells us should be what we consider as facts. Not stories given by people that refused to be interviewed by the police after a murder occurred, or people that hung up on a 911 call while letting people bleed out, or people that purchased guns 3 weeks before a gun murder, or people having an affair before and after that murder and than sleeping in the same bedroom as the murdered woman slept while alive.
Some news outlets were at the bond hearing.
Do you think a reporter made that one sided post in this forum calling things facts that are not??? I don't believe that!
It didn't seem like a reporter posted it but I wouldn't call it one sided. It is either false or it introduces new information that complicates an already complicated case.
when testimony from the defense is presented as facts rather than testimony than it is biased and not remotely facts. Facts are provable things based on concrete evidence, or from eye witnesses that are reliable or professional. Since the information was given as if it was fact and cleverly crafted I still think it comes from one source. That source is obvious to me, its not a reporter, they have no reason to try to sway public opinion, or to personally insult others that challenge what was said about it still smacks of someone that is intentionally misleading others about what facts are, and what occurred in the hearing.
I saw a horrible post deleted by moderators here I assume. It was there for an hour and then gone. It referenced mocking Joe's mother, it used her actual name. Why would anyone post that? sick sick sick! I think only one person or perhaps two would do this.
Of note, LE has consistently referred to both JOE and CHRISTINE as VICTIMS since they day they were brutally murdered. Mocking the grieving mother of a crime victim is sick and sadistic. Of course, if smearing Joe doesn't work, we all know where that leads. Tick tock!
I firmly want justice for Christine and believe her husband was involved, and I do believe Joe was innocent here, BUT that’s not proven by the fact that he was called a victim. Even if he were in the wrong, he was Shot by two different people which makes him victim.
Semantics. When used by LE it has a clear connotation. They did not buy Joe as a killer and said those involved were known to them, day 1.
Does anyone have insight to what this means? Its on the FFx Co Cir Ct site:
Commonwealth's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Suppress filed over the counter and placed in Judge PSA's box. With Attachment CDs (2)
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have insight to what this means? Its on the FFx Co Cir Ct site:
Commonwealth's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Suppress filed over the counter and placed in Judge PSA's box. With Attachment CDs (2)
The Fairfax County prosecutor has filed a motion to argue against whatever evidence the Defendant (Juliana Malgahes) wants to keep out (suppress) of the trial.
You would have to read the pleading (what was filed) itself to find out what Malgahes wants to keep out I don't think FFX County posts the pleadings online. You would have to go to the courthouse and ask to the read the file.
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have insight to what this means? Its on the FFx Co Cir Ct site:
Commonwealth's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Suppress filed over the counter and placed in Judge PSA's box. With Attachment CDs (2)
The Fairfax County prosecutor has filed a motion to argue against whatever evidence the Defendant (Juliana Malgahes) wants to keep out (suppress) of the trial.
You would have to read the pleading (what was filed) itself to find out what Malgahes wants to keep out I don't think FFX County posts the pleadings online. You would have to go to the courthouse and ask to the read the file.
I think 💭 the AF partners killed Ryan first then ordered Christine to strip down and make it look like she was doing something. Nanny kills wife! Bottom line.
Anonymous wrote:I think 💭 the AF partners killed Ryan first then ordered Christine to strip down and make it look like she was doing something. Nanny kills wife! Bottom line.
If there was forensic evidence of that she would be charged w/killing CB. She has not been.
Pressure is really turning up for BB w/no $ coming in.
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}