Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So did anyone figure out the rules to Devils Triangle yet? Need a new drinking game.

Someone posted this on Twitter:

3 glasses aren't really used. Team of two boys vs one girl. Losing girl gets raped. Devil’s Triangle. Bethesda, c 1982.

Were all the parents completely checked out? What kind of demented teenagers would come up with $hit like this? It's like the Lord of the Flies.

Evidently, they didn't believe in actual parenting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So did anyone figure out the rules to Devils Triangle yet? Need a new drinking game.

Someone posted this on Twitter:

3 glasses aren't really used. Team of two boys vs one girl. Losing girl gets raped. Devil’s Triangle. Bethesda, c 1982.

Were all the parents completely checked out? What kind of demented teenagers would come up with $hit like this? It's like the Lord of the Flies.

We always just shot the loser. I guess the way you do it is cleaner. what a bunch if BS.

[Anonymous]

The greatest enemy of democracy is 1. voting uninformed and lacking in critical thinking, 2. apathetic to elections and not participating in voting, 3. Getting swayed by vested interests by not doing rational analysis of the information being fed. Hence our democracy is in a critical phase due to the enemies from within even as the enemies from without are meddling in our election processes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats will fight ANY conservative.

It's not the Democrats who've stopped the Kavanaugh vote - it's moderate Republicans. The few who are left who seem to be taking seriously their Constitutional duty of advice and consent. That's why the WH has so tightly limited the FBI investigation - they're trying to walk the fine line between not actually finding anything bad and giving Collins and Murkowski enough cover to vote for him.

The problem is, as people get over the shock of the hearing and actually think about it and watch clips from it, they're realizing that Kavanaugh's behavior - the lying, avoiding of questions, obsession with beer - is not what we want in a Supreme Court justice. Will those few undecided Senators be brave and vote against him? Or will they toe the party line? That's what this week is about.

Speak for yourself. The people I know feel exactly the opposite way. We feel his anger and emotions were fully warranted, given the accusations against him. I don't hold that against him at all. I would have been very shocked had he remained calm and pleasant, given the obvious assumption of guilt many of the Democrats have toward him. I know if I were accused of something I didn't do, I'd be hard-pressed not to throttle those asking the questions.

Pro tip: then don’t apply to be a Supreme Court Justice. Because this isn’t Bob at the beer hall. We expect much, much more from them. For example, them to hold it together even in difficult, emotional, stressful situation. It’s a big boy game. Wear a cup.

Just because someone is nominated to the SCOTUS doesn’t mean that accusations thrown at him are true. This is a political game on the part of the left.
And, I would expect ANYONE who has had the allegations he had thrown at him to vehemently, passionately, and loudly defend himself. You saw an innocent man passionately defending his name.

[Anonymous]

Since this thread will be closed in favor of pt. 4 in the morning I'm sure, let me just say I WIN THE THREAD. NANANANANANA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats will fight ANY conservative.

It's not the Democrats who've stopped the Kavanaugh vote - it's moderate Republicans. The few who are left who seem to be taking seriously their Constitutional duty of advice and consent. That's why the WH has so tightly limited the FBI investigation - they're trying to walk the fine line between not actually finding anything bad and giving Collins and Murkowski enough cover to vote for him.

The problem is, as people get over the shock of the hearing and actually think about it and watch clips from it, they're realizing that Kavanaugh's behavior - the lying, avoiding of questions, obsession with beer - is not what we want in a Supreme Court justice. Will those few undecided Senators be brave and vote against him? Or will they toe the party line? That's what this week is about.

Speak for yourself. The people I know feel exactly the opposite way. We feel his anger and emotions were fully warranted, given the accusations against him. I don't hold that against him at all. I would have been very shocked had he remained calm and pleasant, given the obvious assumption of guilt many of the Democrats have toward him. I know if I were accused of something I didn't do, I'd be hard-pressed not to throttle those asking the questions.

Pro tip: then don’t apply to be a Supreme Court Justice. Because this isn’t Bob at the beer hall. We expect much, much more from them. For example, them to hold it together even in difficult, emotional, stressful situation. It’s a big boy game. Wear a cup.

It's much, much more than a big boy game to accuse someone of attempted rape and almost smothering you. Your memory needs to be perfectly accurate, and there should be some kind of evidence or support.

Unless you think that Ford bought Judge's book back in 2012 and started the ball rolling then, Judge's book and the "fictional" characters described in it are indirect support.

[Anonymous]

Did Diane Feinstein's assistant leak the letter?

https://www.dailywire.com/news/36228/name-emerges-feinstein-staffer-thought-have-leaked-ryan-saavedra

[Anonymous]

I have been wondering about something. It seems like quite a leap to be calling what Ford alleges as attempted RAPE. It sounds more like attempted groping. Who's to say what his intention was? Can we know what was in his mind? She remained fully clothed, as did he. Many drunk teenage boys have been guilty of groping a girl. To characterize that as attempted rape is a stretch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am a victim of sexual assault.

I feel that this is setting the #metoo movement back.

If the message is believe any allegation then what is the message we are sending?

I simply do not believe her.

What is the message we are sending if we only believe allegations that involve a video or a witness? That if someone rapes a woman in a forest where no one hears her scream, then it didn't happen?

Is there evidence? If not, it’s hard to just “believe her.”

Her testimony is evidence. If there is no evidence, then that means that she has not said anything, and I agree that it would be “hard to just ‘believe her’” in that case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So did anyone figure out the rules to Devils Triangle yet? Need a new drinking game.

Someone posted this on Twitter:

3 glasses aren't really used. Team of two boys vs one girl. Losing girl gets raped. Devil’s Triangle. Bethesda, c 1982.

Were all the parents completely checked out? What kind of demented teenagers would come up with $hit like this? It's like the Lord of the Flies.

Evidently, they didn't believe in actual parenting.

Their own socialization came first. And as long as their kids were with the “right” kids, they didn’t care what they were doing. My grandparents were like this. As long as my mom and her siblings were getting good grades and had the “right” friends, they asked NO questions. My mom said it shocked her even then how bad the lies were that my grandparents “believed.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats will fight ANY conservative.

It's not the Democrats who've stopped the Kavanaugh vote - it's moderate Republicans. The few who are left who seem to be taking seriously their Constitutional duty of advice and consent. That's why the WH has so tightly limited the FBI investigation - they're trying to walk the fine line between not actually finding anything bad and giving Collins and Murkowski enough cover to vote for him.

The problem is, as people get over the shock of the hearing and actually think about it and watch clips from it, they're realizing that Kavanaugh's behavior - the lying, avoiding of questions, obsession with beer - is not what we want in a Supreme Court justice. Will those few undecided Senators be brave and vote against him? Or will they toe the party line? That's what this week is about.

Speak for yourself. The people I know feel exactly the opposite way. We feel his anger and emotions were fully warranted, given the accusations against him. I don't hold that against him at all. I would have been very shocked had he remained calm and pleasant, given the obvious assumption of guilt many of the Democrats have toward him. I know if I were accused of something I didn't do, I'd be hard-pressed not to throttle those asking the questions.

Pro tip: then don’t apply to be a Supreme Court Justice. Because this isn’t Bob at the beer hall. We expect much, much more from them. For example, them to hold it together even in difficult, emotional, stressful situation. It’s a big boy game. Wear a cup.

Just because someone is nominated to the SCOTUS doesn’t mean that accusations thrown at him are true. This is a political game on the part of the left.
And, I would expect ANYONE who has had the allegations he had thrown at him to vehemently, passionately, and loudly defend himself. You saw an innocent man passionately defending his name.

Thomas didn't act belligerent. Nor did he throw out partisan conspiracy theories.

If Kavanaugh thinks that the way to beat the political game is to act political game, then he's already lost. And he did, and he has.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have been wondering about something. It seems like quite a leap to be calling what Ford alleges as attempted RAPE. It sounds more like attempted groping. Who's to say what his intention was? Can we know what was in his mind? She remained fully clothed, as did he. Many drunk teenage boys have been guilty of groping a girl. To characterize that as attempted rape is a stretch.

You have been wondering if her description of him trying to take her clothes off and keep her silent and pinned down to a bed in a room with the music blaring and another drunk cheering him on / freaking out that he was just trying to cop a feel? That she thought he was going to accidentally kill her he was doing this so forcefully? To get to second base? TROLL or IDIOT your pick.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have been wondering about something. It seems like quite a leap to be calling what Ford alleges as attempted RAPE. It sounds more like attempted groping. Who's to say what his intention was? Can we know what was in his mind? She remained fully clothed, as did he. Many drunk teenage boys have been guilty of groping a girl. To characterize that as attempted rape is a stretch.

According to testimony, there was groping, there were attempts at clothing removal, she was being pinned on the bed and her mouth was covered in a violent manner.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh did himself no favors. He should have answered the questions calmly and politely, no matter how insulted he was. I think if he had, he’d be confirmed. (And I don’t want him to be.) He misplayed this.

Yep. He would be sitting on the Court when it opens this week if he had held his shit together. The hearing was meant to make the little lady feel heard. That’s all. But he came out swinging and out of controllp and lied. It’s never the crime— it’s the coveru.

And PPs are right. He was an appellate judge, not a trial judge. But if a defendant in any federal courtroom had talked back to a Judge who directed them to answer a question the way he did with Kloubacher, their ass would have been held in contempt and cooling it in jail. If we can expect the local drug dealer to answer questions without insulting the Judge, we can expect it of a *YALE EDUCATED* jurist.

Also, I think he was drinking before the hearing.

[Anonymous]

This just makes Yale law school look skeevy. For one there’s no class rank and no grades - and then the alleged top students get recommended for top clerkships and jobs based ‘ on their loyalty’ to this couple who is in charge?? Sounds like a big back slapping, dress like a model or else disaster.

https://abovethelaw.com/2018/09/no-accident-brett-kavanaughs-female-law-clerks-looked-like-models-yale-professor-told-students/