Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will never get over that photo. Just looking at Princess Michael's ice-cold eyes made me think of her father who was a Nazi officer. The same Nazis that had a eugenics pogrom to wipe out any undesirables from religion to race to sexuality.

People say history is in the past but how do you have a dinner conversation with an SS officer's daughter who thinks your entire bloodline, and future children, is not only a disgrace but a defilement of everything the royal family stands for?

https://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2014/apr/16/princess-michael-father-nazi-ss-officer

Wow. I didn't know about the SS connection. He was an early and true believer, too. My God. The BRF should have cast her out after that incident with the jewelry.

Wow! Totally crazy... didn’t know about this. She should’ve been expelled ages ago- what a disgrace.

If the US gave Nazi scientists jobs at NASA, then the BRF didn't have to expel its member whose sin was to be born to a SS officer.

What? What is this logic? Whataboutism. The point is the BRF has so many skeletons that it’s laughable they don’t even try to defend the Queen’s grandson and his wife and kid. It’s all PR distraction from the Andrew thing but it’s gross that they are sacrificing Harry to keep Andrew out of the media.

Stop being an apologist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well I am perched to see Oprah's interview on March 7. Oprah said everything was on the table and nothing off-limits. Oh boy.

Well, if everything is on the table, it won’t be there long with Oprah.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will never get over that photo. Just looking at Princess Michael's ice-cold eyes made me think of her father who was a Nazi officer. The same Nazis that had a eugenics pogrom to wipe out any undesirables from religion to race to sexuality.

People say history is in the past but how do you have a dinner conversation with an SS officer's daughter who thinks your entire bloodline, and future children, is not only a disgrace but a defilement of everything the royal family stands for?

https://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2014/apr/16/princess-michael-father-nazi-ss-officer

Wow. I didn't know about the SS connection. He was an early and true believer, too. My God. The BRF should have cast her out after that incident with the jewelry.

Wow! Totally crazy... didn’t know about this. She should’ve been expelled ages ago- what a disgrace.

If the US gave Nazi scientists jobs at NASA, then the BRF didn't have to expel its member whose sin was to be born to a SS officer.

What? What is this logic? Whataboutism. The point is the BRF has so many skeletons that it’s laughable they don’t even try to defend the Queen’s grandson and his wife and kid. It’s all PR distraction from the Andrew thing but it’s gross that they are sacrificing Harry to keep Andrew out of the media.

Stop being an apologist.

This logic is about you holding the BRF to a uniquely high standard of anti-Nazism.

The BRF has defended Harry through many, many questionable things. Like dropping his pants in public, getting drunk, donning a Nazi uniform, and being generally dim and selfish.

Re: the media, it's perfectly capable of following two stories at the same time.

The BRF extended themselves to Meghan. M&H didn't help themselves. The kid was never under attack.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will never get over that photo. Just looking at Princess Michael's ice-cold eyes made me think of her father who was a Nazi officer. The same Nazis that had a eugenics pogrom to wipe out any undesirables from religion to race to sexuality.

People say history is in the past but how do you have a dinner conversation with an SS officer's daughter who thinks your entire bloodline, and future children, is not only a disgrace but a defilement of everything the royal family stands for?

https://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2014/apr/16/princess-michael-father-nazi-ss-officer

Wow. I didn't know about the SS connection. He was an early and true believer, too. My God. The BRF should have cast her out after that incident with the jewelry.

Wow! Totally crazy... didn’t know about this. She should’ve been expelled ages ago- what a disgrace.

If the US gave Nazi scientists jobs at NASA, then the BRF didn't have to expel its member whose sin was to be born to a SS officer.

What? What is this logic? Whataboutism. The point is the BRF has so many skeletons that it’s laughable they don’t even try to defend the Queen’s grandson and his wife and kid. It’s all PR distraction from the Andrew thing but it’s gross that they are sacrificing Harry to keep Andrew out of the media.

Stop being an apologist.

This logic is about you holding the BRF to a uniquely high standard of anti-Nazism.

The BRF has defended Harry through many, many questionable things. Like dropping his pants in public, getting drunk, donning a Nazi uniform, and being generally dim and selfish.

Re: the media, it's perfectly capable of following two stories at the same time.

The BRF extended themselves to Meghan. M&H didn't help themselves. The kid was never under attack.

We’re pretty anti-Nazi in this century. Your examples of Harry dressing up in Nazi costume actually lends credence to the British royals being tolerant of white supremacism and encouraging it in the bloodline. Which explains why Harry had to run with his mixed race children and wife.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This logic is about you holding the BRF to a uniquely high standard of anti-Nazism.

The BRF has defended Harry through many, many questionable things. Like dropping his pants in public, getting drunk, donning a Nazi uniform, and being generally dim and selfish.

Re: the media, it's perfectly capable of following two stories at the same time.

The BRF extended themselves to Meghan. M&H didn't help themselves. The kid was never under attack.

I think it might actually be news to you that William did all those things, too, but Harry was the scapegoat. That’s been his role his entire life. When Harry dressed like a Nazi, did you know that William dressed in an equally offensive costume, but only one got their pictures into the papers. As for appearing dim and selfish, one of the two brothers served active duty in a war zone (until the tabloids spilled his whereabouts and it was deemed too dangerous for him), started two charities and has generally served his country.

Let’s see what William is up to, as the heir apparent to the Prince of Wales (which is not actually something is necessarily given like and HRH at birth, it’s something that has to be given): refused to work with the Prince’s Trust, refused to learn to run Duchy Organics or anything associated with that. Half-assed his helicopter training and worked very, very part time. Takes multiple vacations a year neither he nor his wife can be bothered to do the bare minimum of Royal work. Oh, and then when travel between Scotland and England was still shut down for all but the most necessary work, William and Kate took a choo choo train ride. Unmasked. For three days, including over the border. To say “thank you.”

Oh and don’t forget about William’s possible affair with Rose Hanbury, something for which he has threatened the British papers with lawsuits if any word gets printed about it in them.

So one of them is lazy and dim, yes. It’s not Harry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This logic is about you holding the BRF to a uniquely high standard of anti-Nazism.

The BRF has defended Harry through many, many questionable things. Like dropping his pants in public, getting drunk, donning a Nazi uniform, and being generally dim and selfish.

Re: the media, it's perfectly capable of following two stories at the same time.

The BRF extended themselves to Meghan. M&H didn't help themselves. The kid was never under attack.

I think it might actually be news to you that William did all those things, too, but Harry was the scapegoat. That’s been his role his entire life. When Harry dressed like a Nazi, did you know that William dressed in an equally offensive costume, but only one got their pictures into the papers. As for appearing dim and selfish, one of the two brothers served active duty in a war zone (until the tabloids spilled his whereabouts and it was deemed too dangerous for him), started two charities and has generally served his country.

Let’s see what William is up to, as the heir apparent to the Prince of Wales (which is not actually something is necessarily given like and HRH at birth, it’s something that has to be given): refused to work with the Prince’s Trust, refused to learn to run Duchy Organics or anything associated with that. Half-assed his helicopter training and worked very, very part time. Takes multiple vacations a year neither he nor his wife can be bothered to do the bare minimum of Royal work. Oh, and then when travel between Scotland and England was still shut down for all but the most necessary work, William and Kate took a choo choo train ride. Unmasked. For three days, including over the border. To say “thank you.”

Oh and don’t forget about William’s possible affair with Rose Hanbury, something for which he has threatened the British papers with lawsuits if any word gets printed about it in them.

So one of them is lazy and dim, yes. It’s not Harry.

William was dressed up like a lion at the party that Harry dressed as a Nazi. What is so offensive about lions?

[Anonymous]

OMG that Oprah interview preview.

I have a feeling if they're not hated by Brits now, they will be after this interview.

Regardless whether you love or hate him/her/them, this is unbelievably tacky.

And you bet I"ll be watching with a huge bowl of popcorn!

[Anonymous]

I actually screamed with that Oprah preview. She turned out to be everything people feared and more.

[Anonymous]

LOL forever at holding the BRF to a “uniquely high standard of anti-Naziism.” Let’s not invite the Nazi family members to tea, k?

[Anonymous]

She looks pretty pregnant in the Oprah preview. And she was holding her belly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

We’re pretty anti-Nazi in this century. Your examples of Harry dressing up in Nazi costume actually lends credence to the British royals being tolerant of white supremacism and encouraging it in the bloodline. Which explains why Harry had to run with his mixed race children and wife.

Wait a minute....wait...I get it! Harry had to run...from himself? You mean the family put a gun to his head to wear a Nazi uniform?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OMG that Oprah interview preview.

I have a feeling if they're not hated by Brits now, they will be after this interview.

Regardless whether you love or hate him/her/them, this is unbelievably tacky.

And you bet I"ll be watching with a huge bowl of popcorn!

Lord help me I just watched the preview. OMG. Unsurvivable? Meghan are you OK? Are you?

It's like...the best telenuvela ever. All the elements are there. The dramatic music. The overwrought makeup. The closeup of almost-tearing up. Tacky and bad for you but we'll love it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:LOL forever at holding the BRF to a “uniquely high standard of anti-Naziism.” Let’s not invite the Nazi family members to tea, k?

OK! As long as you don't give them any more NASA jobs! And note these were actual Nazis, not children of ones!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She looks pretty pregnant in the Oprah preview. And she was holding her belly.

With both hands?

[Anonymous]

Meghan talked about wanting to walk the walk during their engagement and marriage. Then they got married and she walked the walk while the press tore her to shreds and her new “family” not only said nothing but also continually weaponized the press against her to shield Will from the cheating scandal and to shield Andrew from the Epstein scandal.

HARRY decides to leave after these betrayals to protect his new family.

I see no lies. Just her husband changing his mind about the course of his life and taking decisive action and her being supportive and likely feeling quite loved as a result.

I agree you people must not have someone who loves you for this to be so foreign a concept.