Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine if Freedman gets to cross Ferrar after those texts she sent JB.

This is a gross thing to say. What if the allegation here is true? Are you still gleeful at the idea of someone with Freedman's personality throwing Ferrar's texts in her face? As another poster pointed out, it's totally reasonable that someone in Ferrar's position would send a text like that even if she was treated very poorly on set because it was her first movie an her was the director and she would be scared to be viewed as a complainer or "hard to work with" so early in her career.

What’s the verified allegation? Stop getting hysterical.

Who's hysterical? If it's a real complaint, she should be treated respectfully and allowed to tell her story. If it's a fake complaint, she's not involved at all and won't testify. It's weird to think the complaint might be real but then to be thrilled by the prospect of her being dismantled on the stand by an aggressive attorney.

It’s called the art of cross examination.

Oh I know what it is. I think it's weird to be excited about it. We're not talking about a murderer or someone who extorted money or abused their family. We're talking about a young woman who may have felt very uncomfortable with her director's behavior towards her while filming a sex scene. It's weird to be excited about someone like that being subject to "the art of cross examination." This isn't someone who did anything wrong. There's no lie for her to be caught in. You're just excited about a lawyer known for being brash and kind of mean having a chance to go after her. That's weird.

I have respect for other attorneys that are masters at what they do.

She shouldn’t have written a gushing email after filming wrapped praising what a great director JB was and about how safe she felt if it wasn’t true. She’s an adult. She’s not some little girl.

If she did, does that mean that it's okay if Baldoni harassed her? Because she didn't do the perfect thing later? So even if he harassed her, she should be dragged over the coals for her subsequent text while he gets off with nothing?

You are only held accountable for sexual harassment if your victim makes zero mistakes after it happens, is that it?

The point is not that it makes it okay for Baldoni to have harassed her. The point is that it makes her CLAIM less credible.
If she wanted her claim ti be credible/believed by others, sending a glowingly complimentary text gushing to your harasser about how safe he made you feel during the entire filming experience does not help to underscire your claim. In fact, it negates it or at the very least, introduces confusion about whether or not it actually occurred.
Because the natural reaction of most people who have been harassed is NOT to voluntarily send an effusively glowing text to their abuser out of the blue.
It’s one thing to keep the peace and not make waves. It’s another thing entirely for her to go out of her way to thank him specifically for the environment and safe space he created since that would completely negate her prior(?) claim.

I was sexually harassed and assaulted at work. The person was a direct supervisor and very powerful within my organization. I was young and at a very low level at the company -- one of the lowest paid people there. I know I said effusive things to that supervisor, multiple times, while working there, even after the incident where they assaulted me. Some might even have been in writing.

The thing was -- that's how everyone spoke there, especially to this supervisor. It was the culture. You said effusively complimentary things about everyone but especially people in management. This particular supervisor was incredibly insecure and when they didn't feel "supported," they could be vindictive and vicious. It was how you protected yourself. It's how you got through the day, deflected unwanted attention or criticism, etc.

If I was treated the same way now, I would speak up immediately and I wouldn't compliment that person. I'd report it to HR. I'd quit. Back then, I didn't feel like I had the right. I doubted myself. I thought things like "maybe I'm overreacting" or "maybe this is what it's like everywhere, and I need to toughen up." I didn't understand my rights. I was also really insecure and I just wanted people to like me.

I’m sorry you had this experience, PP.
And it doesn’t negate what happened to you.
But I’m sure you can objectively understand that anyone’s participation (even for a completely defensible reason) in heaping compliments upon an individual would muddy the waters of credibility regarding which of your unsolicited opinions of said person were truthful and which were not.
Surely you understand that a jury (or anyone who didn’t witness the events of the claim) must consider all of your statements about the person, and it is not reasonable for them to believe both. And you agree, because you’re basically saying no one should believe the complements you gave to that person. They should only believe your claim of abuse.

And this makes sense. Life is messy.
But surely you can see where it would be much easier if the only statements or unsolicited opinions you had made on record regarding this person‘s character were negative. ?
The fact remains that in order to believe the harassment claim, you have to disbelieve the compliments are genuine. And in order to believe the compliments are genuine, you have to disbelieve the harassment claim.
Both cannot be credible and true opinions, and that complicates matters for a jury.

Throwing up in my mouth a little. Seems like you’re having trouble processing why women would feel it necessary to reassure a male in a position of power over them that they were not going to make waves for them.

Make sure you brush your teeth because you are constantly throwing up in your mouth. Really not good for them!

Sometimes good writers (editors?) making critical feminist points have to retain a little mouth-barf. It’s called making a point. It’s called winning an online argument! Excuse you 🤢 🤢 🤢.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine if Freedman gets to cross Ferrar after those texts she sent JB.

This is a gross thing to say. What if the allegation here is true? Are you still gleeful at the idea of someone with Freedman's personality throwing Ferrar's texts in her face? As another poster pointed out, it's totally reasonable that someone in Ferrar's position would send a text like that even if she was treated very poorly on set because it was her first movie an her was the director and she would be scared to be viewed as a complainer or "hard to work with" so early in her career.

What’s the verified allegation? Stop getting hysterical.

Who's hysterical? If it's a real complaint, she should be treated respectfully and allowed to tell her story. If it's a fake complaint, she's not involved at all and won't testify. It's weird to think the complaint might be real but then to be thrilled by the prospect of her being dismantled on the stand by an aggressive attorney.

It’s called the art of cross examination.

Oh I know what it is. I think it's weird to be excited about it. We're not talking about a murderer or someone who extorted money or abused their family. We're talking about a young woman who may have felt very uncomfortable with her director's behavior towards her while filming a sex scene. It's weird to be excited about someone like that being subject to "the art of cross examination." This isn't someone who did anything wrong. There's no lie for her to be caught in. You're just excited about a lawyer known for being brash and kind of mean having a chance to go after her. That's weird.

I have respect for other attorneys that are masters at what they do.

She shouldn’t have written a gushing email after filming wrapped praising what a great director JB was and about how safe she felt if it wasn’t true. She’s an adult. She’s not some little girl.

If she did, does that mean that it's okay if Baldoni harassed her? Because she didn't do the perfect thing later? So even if he harassed her, she should be dragged over the coals for her subsequent text while he gets off with nothing?

You are only held accountable for sexual harassment if your victim makes zero mistakes after it happens, is that it?

The point is not that it makes it okay for Baldoni to have harassed her. The point is that it makes her CLAIM less credible.
If she wanted her claim ti be credible/believed by others, sending a glowingly complimentary text gushing to your harasser about how safe he made you feel during the entire filming experience does not help to underscire your claim. In fact, it negates it or at the very least, introduces confusion about whether or not it actually occurred.
Because the natural reaction of most people who have been harassed is NOT to voluntarily send an effusively glowing text to their abuser out of the blue.
It’s one thing to keep the peace and not make waves. It’s another thing entirely for her to go out of her way to thank him specifically for the environment and safe space he created since that would completely negate her prior(?) claim.

I was sexually harassed and assaulted at work. The person was a direct supervisor and very powerful within my organization. I was young and at a very low level at the company -- one of the lowest paid people there. I know I said effusive things to that supervisor, multiple times, while working there, even after the incident where they assaulted me. Some might even have been in writing.

The thing was -- that's how everyone spoke there, especially to this supervisor. It was the culture. You said effusively complimentary things about everyone but especially people in management. This particular supervisor was incredibly insecure and when they didn't feel "supported," they could be vindictive and vicious. It was how you protected yourself. It's how you got through the day, deflected unwanted attention or criticism, etc.

If I was treated the same way now, I would speak up immediately and I wouldn't compliment that person. I'd report it to HR. I'd quit. Back then, I didn't feel like I had the right. I doubted myself. I thought things like "maybe I'm overreacting" or "maybe this is what it's like everywhere, and I need to toughen up." I didn't understand my rights. I was also really insecure and I just wanted people to like me.

I’m sorry you had this experience, PP.
And it doesn’t negate what happened to you.
But I’m sure you can objectively understand that anyone’s participation (even for a completely defensible reason) in heaping compliments upon an individual would muddy the waters of credibility regarding which of your unsolicited opinions of said person were truthful and which were not.
Surely you understand that a jury (or anyone who didn’t witness the events of the claim) must consider all of your statements about the person, and it is not reasonable for them to believe both. And you agree, because you’re basically saying no one should believe the complements you gave to that person. They should only believe your claim of abuse.

And this makes sense. Life is messy.
But surely you can see where it would be much easier if the only statements or unsolicited opinions you had made on record regarding this person‘s character were negative. ?
The fact remains that in order to believe the harassment claim, you have to disbelieve the compliments are genuine. And in order to believe the compliments are genuine, you have to disbelieve the harassment claim.
Both cannot be credible and true opinions, and that complicates matters for a jury.

Throwing up in my mouth a little. Seems like you’re having trouble processing why women would feel it necessary to reassure a male in a position of power over them that they were not going to make waves for them.

Make sure you brush your teeth because you are constantly throwing up in your mouth. Really not good for them!

I enjoy making callbacks to the OG of throwing up in her mouth, a Baldoni supporter who could keep her lunch down for insane hateful comments re Lively but got the GERD for a well reasoned comment supporting Lively. Want to make sure she feels supported here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine if Freedman gets to cross Ferrar after those texts she sent JB.

This is a gross thing to say. What if the allegation here is true? Are you still gleeful at the idea of someone with Freedman's personality throwing Ferrar's texts in her face? As another poster pointed out, it's totally reasonable that someone in Ferrar's position would send a text like that even if she was treated very poorly on set because it was her first movie an her was the director and she would be scared to be viewed as a complainer or "hard to work with" so early in her career.

What’s the verified allegation? Stop getting hysterical.

Who's hysterical? If it's a real complaint, she should be treated respectfully and allowed to tell her story. If it's a fake complaint, she's not involved at all and won't testify. It's weird to think the complaint might be real but then to be thrilled by the prospect of her being dismantled on the stand by an aggressive attorney.

It’s called the art of cross examination.

Oh I know what it is. I think it's weird to be excited about it. We're not talking about a murderer or someone who extorted money or abused their family. We're talking about a young woman who may have felt very uncomfortable with her director's behavior towards her while filming a sex scene. It's weird to be excited about someone like that being subject to "the art of cross examination." This isn't someone who did anything wrong. There's no lie for her to be caught in. You're just excited about a lawyer known for being brash and kind of mean having a chance to go after her. That's weird.

I have respect for other attorneys that are masters at what they do.

She shouldn’t have written a gushing email after filming wrapped praising what a great director JB was and about how safe she felt if it wasn’t true. She’s an adult. She’s not some little girl.

If she did, does that mean that it's okay if Baldoni harassed her? Because she didn't do the perfect thing later? So even if he harassed her, she should be dragged over the coals for her subsequent text while he gets off with nothing?

You are only held accountable for sexual harassment if your victim makes zero mistakes after it happens, is that it?

The point is not that it makes it okay for Baldoni to have harassed her. The point is that it makes her CLAIM less credible.
If she wanted her claim ti be credible/believed by others, sending a glowingly complimentary text gushing to your harasser about how safe he made you feel during the entire filming experience does not help to underscire your claim. In fact, it negates it or at the very least, introduces confusion about whether or not it actually occurred.
Because the natural reaction of most people who have been harassed is NOT to voluntarily send an effusively glowing text to their abuser out of the blue.
It’s one thing to keep the peace and not make waves. It’s another thing entirely for her to go out of her way to thank him specifically for the environment and safe space he created since that would completely negate her prior(?) claim.

I was sexually harassed and assaulted at work. The person was a direct supervisor and very powerful within my organization. I was young and at a very low level at the company -- one of the lowest paid people there. I know I said effusive things to that supervisor, multiple times, while working there, even after the incident where they assaulted me. Some might even have been in writing.

The thing was -- that's how everyone spoke there, especially to this supervisor. It was the culture. You said effusively complimentary things about everyone but especially people in management. This particular supervisor was incredibly insecure and when they didn't feel "supported," they could be vindictive and vicious. It was how you protected yourself. It's how you got through the day, deflected unwanted attention or criticism, etc.

If I was treated the same way now, I would speak up immediately and I wouldn't compliment that person. I'd report it to HR. I'd quit. Back then, I didn't feel like I had the right. I doubted myself. I thought things like "maybe I'm overreacting" or "maybe this is what it's like everywhere, and I need to toughen up." I didn't understand my rights. I was also really insecure and I just wanted people to like me.

I’m sorry that this happened to you but she sent gushing texts after filming was done. She didn’t have to work with him anymore. Her job isn’t like your job.

And how do we know she wasn't up for another role in a Wayfarer production or something directed by a friend of Baldoni?

And how do we know she wasn’t promised a big role in a production by RR and representation by Ari Emanuel?

I am the PP and I think that's possible. What I am disputing is the implication in some posts that Ferrer sent those texts to Baldoni it categorically proves she wasn't harassed, end of story. Baldoni, of course, has every right to cross-examine her testimony and point out the contradictions. I, and other posters, are simply explaining reasons why she may have sent those texts even if she had actually been harassed (big emphasis on "if"! we don't know if it's true).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine if Freedman gets to cross Ferrar after those texts she sent JB.

This is a gross thing to say. What if the allegation here is true? Are you still gleeful at the idea of someone with Freedman's personality throwing Ferrar's texts in her face? As another poster pointed out, it's totally reasonable that someone in Ferrar's position would send a text like that even if she was treated very poorly on set because it was her first movie an her was the director and she would be scared to be viewed as a complainer or "hard to work with" so early in her career.

What’s the verified allegation? Stop getting hysterical.

Who's hysterical? If it's a real complaint, she should be treated respectfully and allowed to tell her story. If it's a fake complaint, she's not involved at all and won't testify. It's weird to think the complaint might be real but then to be thrilled by the prospect of her being dismantled on the stand by an aggressive attorney.

It’s called the art of cross examination.

Oh I know what it is. I think it's weird to be excited about it. We're not talking about a murderer or someone who extorted money or abused their family. We're talking about a young woman who may have felt very uncomfortable with her director's behavior towards her while filming a sex scene. It's weird to be excited about someone like that being subject to "the art of cross examination." This isn't someone who did anything wrong. There's no lie for her to be caught in. You're just excited about a lawyer known for being brash and kind of mean having a chance to go after her. That's weird.

I have respect for other attorneys that are masters at what they do.

She shouldn’t have written a gushing email after filming wrapped praising what a great director JB was and about how safe she felt if it wasn’t true. She’s an adult. She’s not some little girl.

If she did, does that mean that it's okay if Baldoni harassed her? Because she didn't do the perfect thing later? So even if he harassed her, she should be dragged over the coals for her subsequent text while he gets off with nothing?

You are only held accountable for sexual harassment if your victim makes zero mistakes after it happens, is that it?

The point is not that it makes it okay for Baldoni to have harassed her. The point is that it makes her CLAIM less credible.
If she wanted her claim ti be credible/believed by others, sending a glowingly complimentary text gushing to your harasser about how safe he made you feel during the entire filming experience does not help to underscire your claim. In fact, it negates it or at the very least, introduces confusion about whether or not it actually occurred.
Because the natural reaction of most people who have been harassed is NOT to voluntarily send an effusively glowing text to their abuser out of the blue.
It’s one thing to keep the peace and not make waves. It’s another thing entirely for her to go out of her way to thank him specifically for the environment and safe space he created since that would completely negate her prior(?) claim.

I was sexually harassed and assaulted at work. The person was a direct supervisor and very powerful within my organization. I was young and at a very low level at the company -- one of the lowest paid people there. I know I said effusive things to that supervisor, multiple times, while working there, even after the incident where they assaulted me. Some might even have been in writing.

The thing was -- that's how everyone spoke there, especially to this supervisor. It was the culture. You said effusively complimentary things about everyone but especially people in management. This particular supervisor was incredibly insecure and when they didn't feel "supported," they could be vindictive and vicious. It was how you protected yourself. It's how you got through the day, deflected unwanted attention or criticism, etc.

If I was treated the same way now, I would speak up immediately and I wouldn't compliment that person. I'd report it to HR. I'd quit. Back then, I didn't feel like I had the right. I doubted myself. I thought things like "maybe I'm overreacting" or "maybe this is what it's like everywhere, and I need to toughen up." I didn't understand my rights. I was also really insecure and I just wanted people to like me.

I’m sorry that this happened to you but she sent gushing texts after filming was done. She didn’t have to work with him anymore. Her job isn’t like your job.

And how do we know she wasn't up for another role in a Wayfarer production or something directed by a friend of Baldoni?

And how do we know she wasn’t promised a big role in a production by RR and representation by Ari Emanuel?

I am the PP and I think that's possible. What I am disputing is the implication in some posts that Ferrer sent those texts to Baldoni it categorically proves she wasn't harassed, end of story. Baldoni, of course, has every right to cross-examine her testimony and point out the contradictions. I, and other posters, are simply explaining reasons why she may have sent those texts even if she had actually been harassed (big emphasis on "if"! we don't know if it's true).

Gross one here. And cross-examined she will be. Whether you all like it or not, those gushing texts are not going to play well in front of a jury.

[Anonymous]

I just saw a photo of B&L at a public event, their first appearance in a long time. I actually felt bad for RR, he looks like he’s lost a lot of weight and the stress is very visible in his appearance. They’re all human beings. I’m not following the case or this thread because it’s gotten too into the weeds with the legal stuff. But I can see the toll this has taken on him (BL looks as beautiful as ever). It had to be hard to go to an event where they would’ve previously been the king and queen. Their reputation has taken a huge hit.

[Anonymous]

I’m going to sit and wait for more confirmation.

These allegations already have red flags. Sony already gave a statement that no HR complaints were submitted during the film production. The dates are redacted. The HR complaints could have been submitted at any moment, during marketing, before the lawsuit, etc. And also, after production, Isabela Ferrer sent Justin an email telling him how great it was working with him.

This all sounds really sus

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine if Freedman gets to cross Ferrar after those texts she sent JB.

This is a gross thing to say. What if the allegation here is true? Are you still gleeful at the idea of someone with Freedman's personality throwing Ferrar's texts in her face? As another poster pointed out, it's totally reasonable that someone in Ferrar's position would send a text like that even if she was treated very poorly on set because it was her first movie an her was the director and she would be scared to be viewed as a complainer or "hard to work with" so early in her career.

What’s the verified allegation? Stop getting hysterical.

Who's hysterical? If it's a real complaint, she should be treated respectfully and allowed to tell her story. If it's a fake complaint, she's not involved at all and won't testify. It's weird to think the complaint might be real but then to be thrilled by the prospect of her being dismantled on the stand by an aggressive attorney.

It’s called the art of cross examination.

Oh I know what it is. I think it's weird to be excited about it. We're not talking about a murderer or someone who extorted money or abused their family. We're talking about a young woman who may have felt very uncomfortable with her director's behavior towards her while filming a sex scene. It's weird to be excited about someone like that being subject to "the art of cross examination." This isn't someone who did anything wrong. There's no lie for her to be caught in. You're just excited about a lawyer known for being brash and kind of mean having a chance to go after her. That's weird.

I have respect for other attorneys that are masters at what they do.

She shouldn’t have written a gushing email after filming wrapped praising what a great director JB was and about how safe she felt if it wasn’t true. She’s an adult. She’s not some little girl.

If she did, does that mean that it's okay if Baldoni harassed her? Because she didn't do the perfect thing later? So even if he harassed her, she should be dragged over the coals for her subsequent text while he gets off with nothing?

You are only held accountable for sexual harassment if your victim makes zero mistakes after it happens, is that it?

The point is not that it makes it okay for Baldoni to have harassed her. The point is that it makes her CLAIM less credible.
If she wanted her claim ti be credible/believed by others, sending a glowingly complimentary text gushing to your harasser about how safe he made you feel during the entire filming experience does not help to underscire your claim. In fact, it negates it or at the very least, introduces confusion about whether or not it actually occurred.
Because the natural reaction of most people who have been harassed is NOT to voluntarily send an effusively glowing text to their abuser out of the blue.
It’s one thing to keep the peace and not make waves. It’s another thing entirely for her to go out of her way to thank him specifically for the environment and safe space he created since that would completely negate her prior(?) claim.

I was sexually harassed and assaulted at work. The person was a direct supervisor and very powerful within my organization. I was young and at a very low level at the company -- one of the lowest paid people there. I know I said effusive things to that supervisor, multiple times, while working there, even after the incident where they assaulted me. Some might even have been in writing.

The thing was -- that's how everyone spoke there, especially to this supervisor. It was the culture. You said effusively complimentary things about everyone but especially people in management. This particular supervisor was incredibly insecure and when they didn't feel "supported," they could be vindictive and vicious. It was how you protected yourself. It's how you got through the day, deflected unwanted attention or criticism, etc.

If I was treated the same way now, I would speak up immediately and I wouldn't compliment that person. I'd report it to HR. I'd quit. Back then, I didn't feel like I had the right. I doubted myself. I thought things like "maybe I'm overreacting" or "maybe this is what it's like everywhere, and I need to toughen up." I didn't understand my rights. I was also really insecure and I just wanted people to like me.

I’m sorry you had this experience, PP.
And it doesn’t negate what happened to you.
But I’m sure you can objectively understand that anyone’s participation (even for a completely defensible reason) in heaping compliments upon an individual would muddy the waters of credibility regarding which of your unsolicited opinions of said person were truthful and which were not.
Surely you understand that a jury (or anyone who didn’t witness the events of the claim) must consider all of your statements about the person, and it is not reasonable for them to believe both. And you agree, because you’re basically saying no one should believe the complements you gave to that person. They should only believe your claim of abuse.

And this makes sense. Life is messy.
But surely you can see where it would be much easier if the only statements or unsolicited opinions you had made on record regarding this person‘s character were negative. ?
The fact remains that in order to believe the harassment claim, you have to disbelieve the compliments are genuine. And in order to believe the compliments are genuine, you have to disbelieve the harassment claim.
Both cannot be credible and true opinions, and that complicates matters for a jury.

Throwing up in my mouth a little. Seems like you’re having trouble processing why women would feel it necessary to reassure a male in a position of power over them that they were not going to make waves for them.

Make sure you brush your teeth because you are constantly throwing up in your mouth. Really not good for them!

I enjoy making callbacks to the OG of throwing up in her mouth, a Baldoni supporter who could keep her lunch down for insane hateful comments re Lively but got the GERD for a well reasoned comment supporting Lively. Want to make sure she feels supported here.

Can you find that quote? Because you’re coming off a little Plantation Kheelesi liarface here, babe.

No need to find it. I’ll own it. She said “It's like it doesn't actually matter who "she" is and what happened, the mob will always point the finger at the woman and say "I saw Goody Procter with the devil.”

And I said I threw up in my mouth a little. I also said that I ignore most of the stuff on here that’s clearly written by insane people. But, oops, in this case I broke my own rule.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m going to sit and wait for more confirmation.

These allegations already have red flags. Sony already gave a statement that no HR complaints were submitted during the film production. The dates are redacted. The HR complaints could have been submitted at any moment, during marketing, before the lawsuit, etc. And also, after production, Isabela Ferrer sent Justin an email telling him how great it was working with him.

This all sounds really sus

It’s 100% sus.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just saw a photo of B&L at a public event, their first appearance in a long time. I actually felt bad for RR, he looks like he’s lost a lot of weight and the stress is very visible in his appearance. They’re all human beings. I’m not following the case or this thread because it’s gotten too into the weeds with the legal stuff. But I can see the toll this has taken on him (BL looks as beautiful as ever). It had to be hard to go to an event where they would’ve previously been the king and queen. Their reputation has taken a huge hit.

It's the SNL 50th reunion tonight and actually I think their appearance there means the opposite -- I think Ari Emanuel coming out to defend them and then them showing up to a big industry event with a ton of A-listers is a sign that the industry is choosing a side and it's them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just saw a photo of B&L at a public event, their first appearance in a long time. I actually felt bad for RR, he looks like he’s lost a lot of weight and the stress is very visible in his appearance. They’re all human beings. I’m not following the case or this thread because it’s gotten too into the weeds with the legal stuff. But I can see the toll this has taken on him (BL looks as beautiful as ever). It had to be hard to go to an event where they would’ve previously been the king and queen. Their reputation has taken a huge hit.

It's the SNL 50th reunion tonight and actually I think their appearance there means the opposite -- I think Ari Emanuel coming out to defend them and then them showing up to a big industry event with a ton of A-listers is a sign that the industry is choosing a side and it's them.

And Reynolds was featured in a sketch.

They will be fine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Putting on my tinfoil hat:

For some reason (probably to smash the Me Too movement to bits), the right ring media is obsessed with taking Lively down.

What if these fake HR complaints—which put forth some truly disturbing (albeit kind of comical) scenarios—were “leaked” by some equally disturbed right wingers to take the wind out of whatever minor-type-stuff is in Lively’s amended complaint tomorrow. So that her kind of “borderline” harassment claims look extra fluffy when we compare them to what we “thought” was coming.

I don’t know about your second para but I’ve been wondering about your first, too. I wouldn’t be surprised if right wingers have clung to this to try to do away with me too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just saw a photo of B&L at a public event, their first appearance in a long time. I actually felt bad for RR, he looks like he’s lost a lot of weight and the stress is very visible in his appearance. They’re all human beings. I’m not following the case or this thread because it’s gotten too into the weeds with the legal stuff. But I can see the toll this has taken on him (BL looks as beautiful as ever). It had to be hard to go to an event where they would’ve previously been the king and queen. Their reputation has taken a huge hit.

It's the SNL 50th reunion tonight and actually I think their appearance there means the opposite -- I think Ari Emanuel coming out to defend them and then them showing up to a big industry event with a ton of A-listers is a sign that the industry is choosing a side and it's them.

I totally disagree. They were the butt of jokes at awards shows. Taylor Swift has abandoned them. If reports are true, Anna Kendrick wants nothing to do with Blake etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just saw a photo of B&L at a public event, their first appearance in a long time. I actually felt bad for RR, he looks like he’s lost a lot of weight and the stress is very visible in his appearance. They’re all human beings. I’m not following the case or this thread because it’s gotten too into the weeds with the legal stuff. But I can see the toll this has taken on him (BL looks as beautiful as ever). It had to be hard to go to an event where they would’ve previously been the king and queen. Their reputation has taken a huge hit.

It's the SNL 50th reunion tonight and actually I think their appearance there means the opposite -- I think Ari Emanuel coming out to defend them and then them showing up to a big industry event with a ton of A-listers is a sign that the industry is choosing a side and it's them.

And Reynolds was featured in a sketch.

They will be fine.

And he joked about the drama!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just saw a photo of B&L at a public event, their first appearance in a long time. I actually felt bad for RR, he looks like he’s lost a lot of weight and the stress is very visible in his appearance. They’re all human beings. I’m not following the case or this thread because it’s gotten too into the weeds with the legal stuff. But I can see the toll this has taken on him (BL looks as beautiful as ever). It had to be hard to go to an event where they would’ve previously been the king and queen. Their reputation has taken a huge hit.

It's the SNL 50th reunion tonight and actually I think their appearance there means the opposite -- I think Ari Emanuel coming out to defend them and then them showing up to a big industry event with a ton of A-listers is a sign that the industry is choosing a side and it's them.

And Reynolds was featured in a sketch.

They will be fine.

And he joked about the drama!!

Because lying about SH and trying to ruin a man’s life is such a joke?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just saw a photo of B&L at a public event, their first appearance in a long time. I actually felt bad for RR, he looks like he’s lost a lot of weight and the stress is very visible in his appearance. They’re all human beings. I’m not following the case or this thread because it’s gotten too into the weeds with the legal stuff. But I can see the toll this has taken on him (BL looks as beautiful as ever). It had to be hard to go to an event where they would’ve previously been the king and queen. Their reputation has taken a huge hit.

It's the SNL 50th reunion tonight and actually I think their appearance there means the opposite -- I think Ari Emanuel coming out to defend them and then them showing up to a big industry event with a ton of A-listers is a sign that the industry is choosing a side and it's them.

And Reynolds was featured in a sketch.

They will be fine.

And he joked about the drama!!

Where is the you’re so gross poster?