Little pink monster blog

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I know N wasn’t thinking clearly because she could’ve secured herself a sizeable alimony payment if she hadn’t remarried so quickly. She did blog about how she wanted another baby and always planned on being a SAHM after the divorce, so I’m not surprised she clung to the first opportunity to get another man to support her that came along.

If she just stops hinting about kane/the divorce (ie here are some circus pants I wore to court..... standing up for myself..... but more about that later) then this stupid thread will die out again. Attention means more to her than her daughters, clearly.

She can't be specific because of an NDA, so she'll continue to be vague. Can't let Kane's secrets out of the closet or he might lose what's left of his ever friggin mind!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know N wasn’t thinking clearly because she could’ve secured herself a sizeable alimony payment if she hadn’t remarried so quickly. She did blog about how she wanted another baby and always planned on being a SAHM after the divorce, so I’m not surprised she clung to the first opportunity to get another man to support her that came along.

If she just stops hinting about kane/the divorce (ie here are some circus pants I wore to court..... standing up for myself..... but more about that later) then this stupid thread will die out again. Attention means more to her than her daughters, clearly.

She can't be specific because of an NDA, so she'll continue to be vague. Can't let Kane's secrets out of the closet or he might lose what's left of his ever friggin mind!

If there is a NDA, she voluntarily agreed to it. If not, she can seek to have it voided. Right now, she is taking a page out of Danni’s book by vague postings. It is generating traffic to her blog as well as 20 plus pages on DCUM. At the end of the day, who really cares about her former marriage? Two imperfect people had an imperfect marriage and are now claiming their lives are perfect.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know N wasn’t thinking clearly because she could’ve secured herself a sizeable alimony payment if she hadn’t remarried so quickly. She did blog about how she wanted another baby and always planned on being a SAHM after the divorce, so I’m not surprised she clung to the first opportunity to get another man to support her that came along.

If she just stops hinting about kane/the divorce (ie here are some circus pants I wore to court..... standing up for myself..... but more about that later) then this stupid thread will die out again. Attention means more to her than her daughters, clearly.

She can't be specific because of an NDA, so she'll continue to be vague. Can't let Kane's secrets out of the closet or he might lose what's left of his ever friggin mind!

If there is a NDA, she voluntarily agreed to it. If not, she can seek to have it voided. Right now, she is taking a page out of Danni’s book by vague postings. It is generating traffic to her blog as well as 20 plus pages on DCUM. At the end of the day, who really cares about her former marriage? Two imperfect people had an imperfect marriage and are now claiming their lives are perfect.

I'd void that b$#@&

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know N wasn’t thinking clearly because she could’ve secured herself a sizeable alimony payment if she hadn’t remarried so quickly. She did blog about how she wanted another baby and always planned on being a SAHM after the divorce, so I’m not surprised she clung to the first opportunity to get another man to support her that came along.

If she just stops hinting about kane/the divorce (ie here are some circus pants I wore to court..... standing up for myself..... but more about that later) then this stupid thread will die out again. Attention means more to her than her daughters, clearly.

She can't be specific because of an NDA, so she'll continue to be vague. Can't let Kane's secrets out of the closet or he might lose what's left of his ever friggin mind!

Get out of that NDA!

[Anonymous]

Sarah should have Natasha on her podcast (if she’s still even doing that)

[Anonymous]

Hopefully Natasha is smarter than that.

[Anonymous]

It’s weird that she hunts at having the girls with her and then he posts about them being with him doing pretty normal things (like homework, after school routine). She posted about how sad weekends when the girls aren’t there can be, so does she have them only every other weekend? Or are they alternating weeks?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know N wasn’t thinking clearly because she could’ve secured herself a sizeable alimony payment if she hadn’t remarried so quickly. She did blog about how she wanted another baby and always planned on being a SAHM after the divorce, so I’m not surprised she clung to the first opportunity to get another man to support her that came along.

If she just stops hinting about kane/the divorce (ie here are some circus pants I wore to court..... standing up for myself..... but more about that later) then this stupid thread will die out again. Attention means more to her than her daughters, clearly.

She can't be specific because of an NDA, so she'll continue to be vague. Can't let Kane's secrets out of the closet or he might lose what's left of his ever friggin mind!

If there is a NDA, she voluntarily agreed to it. If not, she can seek to have it voided. Right now, she is taking a page out of Danni’s book by vague postings. It is generating traffic to her blog as well as 20 plus pages on DCUM. At the end of the day, who really cares about her former marriage? Two imperfect people had an imperfect marriage and are now claiming their lives are perfect.

I think she’d have to pay back any money she got for signing it.


I'd void that b$#@&

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s weird that she hunts at having the girls with her and then he posts about them being with him doing pretty normal things (like homework, after school routine). She posted about how sad weekends when the girls aren’t there can be, so does she have them only every other weekend? Or are they alternating weeks?

It wouldn't surprise me that they alernate weekends. That's what a lot of divorced couples do

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s weird that she hunts at having the girls with her and then he posts about them being with him doing pretty normal things (like homework, after school routine). She posted about how sad weekends when the girls aren’t there can be, so does she have them only every other weekend? Or are they alternating weeks?

It wouldn't surprise me that they alernate weekends. That's what a lot of divorced couples do

**Alternate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I know N wasn’t thinking clearly because she could’ve secured herself a sizeable alimony payment if she hadn’t remarried so quickly. She did blog about how she wanted another baby and always planned on being a SAHM after the divorce, so I’m not surprised she clung to the first opportunity to get another man to support her that came along.

If she just stops hinting about kane/the divorce (ie here are some circus pants I wore to court..... standing up for myself..... but more about that later) then this stupid thread will die out again. Attention means more to her than her daughters, clearly.

I’m sure her child support is more than sizable enough without alimony. She’s probably covering their rent every month, with money to spare. Can’t lie, I’m jealous of her setup, lol – I’d be SO FALSELY OUTWARDLY GRACIOUS toward my ex-husband if he were paying through the nose for me to live my best life!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know N wasn’t thinking clearly because she could’ve secured herself a sizeable alimony payment if she hadn’t remarried so quickly. She did blog about how she wanted another baby and always planned on being a SAHM after the divorce, so I’m not surprised she clung to the first opportunity to get another man to support her that came along.

If she just stops hinting about kane/the divorce (ie here are some circus pants I wore to court..... standing up for myself..... but more about that later) then this stupid thread will die out again. Attention means more to her than her daughters, clearly.

I’m sure her child support is more than sizable enough without alimony. She’s probably covering their rent every month, with money to spare. Can’t lie, I’m jealous of her setup, lol – I’d be SO FALSELY OUTWARDLY GRACIOUS toward my ex-husband if he were paying through the nose for me to live my best life!

She earns that money just having to deal with him I'm sure!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s weird that she hunts at having the girls with her and then he posts about them being with him doing pretty normal things (like homework, after school routine). She posted about how sad weekends when the girls aren’t there can be, so does she have them only every other weekend? Or are they alternating weeks?

It wouldn't surprise me that they alernate weekends. That's what a lot of divorced couples do

I meant it looks like she’s with him during the weeks too. So not just alternating weekends, do they alternate weeks? Or does he have them during the week and she gets them every other weekend?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s weird that she hunts at having the girls with her and then he posts about them being with him doing pretty normal things (like homework, after school routine). She posted about how sad weekends when the girls aren’t there can be, so does she have them only every other weekend? Or are they alternating weeks?

It wouldn't surprise me that they alernate weekends. That's what a lot of divorced couples do

I meant it looks like she’s with him during the weeks too. So not just alternating weekends, do they alternate weeks? Or does he have them during the week and she gets them every other weekend?

What a terrible life for the girls. No kid likes being bounced back and forth between 2 homes all the time. Way to guarantee them having issues, mom and dad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s weird that she hunts at having the girls with her and then he posts about them being with him doing pretty normal things (like homework, after school routine). She posted about how sad weekends when the girls aren’t there can be, so does she have them only every other weekend? Or are they alternating weeks?

It wouldn't surprise me that they alernate weekends. That's what a lot of divorced couples do

I meant it looks like she’s with him during the weeks too. So not just alternating weekends, do they alternate weeks? Or does he have them during the week and she gets them every other weekend?

What a terrible life for the girls. No kid likes being bounced back and forth between 2 homes all the time. Way to guarantee them having issues, mom and dad.

It's called shared custody....duh. What do you expect them to live with one parent full time when they both live in the same area? That would make them feel like the other parent wanted them less.