James Comey Indictment

[Anonymous]

As to people worrying about the financial cost to Comey - I doubt very much that Patrick Fitzgerald is charging him for the pleasure of coming out of boring retirement to take on the POS in the WH and his stupid minion in the DOJ.

I’ve been wondering this myself - if Fitzgerald is doing it for fun or whether he’s being paid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Comey looks depressed on TV. I wonder why.

Gee, I wonder - a lifelong civil servant, a person of integrity and principle (never mind your opinions of his HRC gaffe) who led the FBI being hauled into federal court on TRUMPed up charges brought by the DOJ he once served and from which his beloved daughter was fired without cause and two of his sons-in-law have resigned on principle - why would that depress a man?

My own career as a lawyer was much more modest, but I studied at Georgetown and spent time in the federal courts there and have had lifelong reverence for the institutions I'm now watching being stained and destroyed by the pig in the WH and I take a little time every single day to cry over it. It's AWFUL to watch this unfolding, if you give any kind of care for our democracy.

As to people worrying about the financial cost to Comey - I doubt very much that Patrick Fitzgerald is charging him for the pleasure of coming out of boring retirement to take on the POS in the WH and his stupid minion in the DOJ. I'm sure he's thrilled to be doing it, and I can't wait to watch him TROUNCE that idiot USA Hooligan and her stooges, if this farce ever even makes it to trial - highly unlikely given that her appointment is most likely in violation of statute which will render the indictment hollow and the statute of limitations has passed. So sad!

Hear hear!

[Anonymous]

So the President can’t tell the difference between a post and a direct message, in addition to clearly directing the attorney general to arrest his perceived enemies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So the President can’t tell the difference between a post and a direct message, in addition to clearly directing the attorney general to arrest his perceived enemies.

If we survive this, it will be because the fascists trying to take over our country are dumb as fuck

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would love to see Comey tried and convicted and to spend some time in prison. But I do t think that will happen. Do I think he is guilty? Hell yes. Not only of the charges against him but of other crimes for which the statute of limitations has expired. But I don’t believe a jury of 12 in VA will find him guilty. Too many liberals part of the resistance.

He destroyed the reputation of the FBI. This is the opinion of many agents and specialists who worked under him. So glad he is no longer there.

Are you kidding me? But agents loved him. I was inside FBI and he was beloved. People were shocked when he was unceremoniously fired and found out via tv broadcast when he was in the LA office and had to fly home on his own dime. I don’t revere him the way others did (I think he is a little over the top), but I have no doubt he is patriotic and cares about our country, which is a lot more than you can say about Trump.

[Anonymous]

He is definitely a loser. Trump did the right thing firing him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He is definitely a loser. Trump did the right thing firing him.

Trump is the loser. He's going to lose this case, bigly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He is definitely a loser. Trump did the right thing firing him.

Trump is the loser. He's going to lose this case, bigly.

Like he’s lost most of his cases. So many.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You think it's normal for the President to direct the DOJ to go after his enemies, and for them to actually do it?

Nixon did it. Let's see how it ends for Trump.

Pam Bondi is worse than Mitchell. I hope she receives the same fate he received.

[Anonymous]

No one in EDVA would prosecute Comey so they had to go looking elsewhere for MAGAs to do it.

[Anonymous]

So now the DoJ is going to try to have Patrick Fitzgerald (Cpmey's attorney) disqualified from the case. DoJ has historically had attorneys who were well-respected. It will be joy to watch these new Trump pawns get kicked around like a futsal ball.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So now the DoJ is going to try to have Patrick Fitzgerald (Cpmey's attorney) disqualified from the case. DoJ has historically had attorneys who were well-respected. It will be joy to watch these new Trump pawns get kicked around like a futsal ball.

This is going to piss off the judge big time. The government motion has a bunch of misrepresentations and is a pretty transparent effort to slow down a case the prosecutors are completely unprepared to try.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So now the DoJ is going to try to have Patrick Fitzgerald (Cpmey's attorney) disqualified from the case. DoJ has historically had attorneys who were well-respected. It will be joy to watch these new Trump pawns get kicked around like a futsal ball.

This is going to piss off the judge big time. The government motion has a bunch of misrepresentations and is a pretty transparent effort to slow down a case the prosecutors are completely unprepared to try.

I wonder if the judge watched 60 minutes and the story about how often Trump administration attorneys are submitting outright lies and misrepresentations to the court? It is appalling the number of times that Trump & Co. have now been caught outright lying to the courts. I hope the judges begin to notify state bars of these instances so appropriate action can be taken.

For those who aren't lawyers, there is only one rule hammered into you in law school. Every day for 3 years.

It is not "Rule of Law". It is not anything else.

It is "DO NOT LIE TO A COURT! THEY WILL SERIOUSLY KICK IN THE NUTS FOR THAT!"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He is definitely a loser. Trump did the right thing firing him.

Trump is the loser. He's going to lose this case, bigly.

Yup

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So now the DoJ is going to try to have Patrick Fitzgerald (Cpmey's attorney) disqualified from the case. DoJ has historically had attorneys who were well-respected. It will be joy to watch these new Trump pawns get kicked around like a futsal ball.

This is going to piss off the judge big time. The government motion has a bunch of misrepresentations and is a pretty transparent effort to slow down a case the prosecutors are completely unprepared to try.

I wonder if the judge watched 60 minutes and the story about how often Trump administration attorneys are submitting outright lies and misrepresentations to the court? It is appalling the number of times that Trump & Co. have now been caught outright lying to the courts. I hope the judges begin to notify state bars of these instances so appropriate action can be taken.

For those who aren't lawyers, there is only one rule hammered into you in law school. Every day for 3 years.

It is not "Rule of Law". It is not anything else.

It is "DO NOT LIE TO A COURT! THEY WILL SERIOUSLY KICK IN THE NUTS FOR THAT!"

MAGAs don't mind liars