+ 1 This - especially as some of us Basis families are zoned for those social promoting DCPS schools. |
| the current 6th grade only lost a handful of kids or the current 7th grade? significant attrition does not tend to really start until after 6th grade (the first year with comps). |
Wrong. They don’t lose 1/2 of kids after 8th. The fact that Basis has attrition is no surprise. The school is 100% lottery; many kids can’t handle the rigor and should have stayed in their in-bounds school or looked elsewhere; and Basis doesn’t socially promote or backfill. No other school, public or private, does that in the area. Basis has, per capita, the best college admissions of any public school in DC. Obviously, plenty of smart kids stay to graduate. |
Other schools have attrition but also socially promote and backfill. BASIS DC does not. You are comparing apples to oranges. |
+1. I sent my kids to a DCPS elementary. Between PK3 and Kindergarten, 90% of the class turned over. If the school never backfilled, there would be barely anyone left. |
+2. My kid was in a DCPS elementary from PK3 to 4th grade. Of the 80 kids that started together, 20 remained by 4th grade. Only 2 of them remained for 5th grade. Those 2 left for charters in 6th grade. |
We are talking middle to high school here and DCI and Latin. They definitely don’t lose 60-70% of kids from 8th to 12th. |
Same here but we didn't get into BASIS for either of our children in the last few years, making whatever standards BASIS might maintain irrelevant for the likes of us. The system is broken when a school with high standards in a dark, cramped building has no room for your students, like all the other acceptable options in the public system, and the neighborhood middle school you have unfettered access to has such low standards that it's unacceptable to your family. Nobody's filling the gap for us. |
This right here. |
Yep. Shut out of Basis, Latin, with a high-achieving kid. The gap is huge. |
Why doesn’t BASIS backfill? It’s a public school. How do they avoid taking new students when there are so many who are initially shut out and would do just fine entering in late MS and for HS. |
Isn’t it obvious? Because they can’t choose and pick who they get and are unwilling to do the work all other schools do to help integrate and support new kids. It is very easy to have better numbers when you weed out low performers and refuse to roll the dice in taking new students. Basis is doing nothing special and no really heavy lifting at all. |
There’s no real debate at this point: BASIS doesn’t backfill. But what’s often missed in these discussions is just how structurally dependent the school’s academic model is on that fact. If BASIS did backfill, it likely couldn’t deliver the program it’s known for—or at least not in the way families currently experience it. Backfilling is manageable at most schools because it doesn’t fundamentally alter what those schools are offering in the first place. The academic pace and expectations are often modest, and the gaps between entering and existing students, while real, don’t dramatically shift classroom dynamics or outcomes. In some cases, schools aren’t doing much to bring backfilled students up to speed, but because the bar is already low or inconsistent, the disruption is minimal. At BASIS, it’s different. The curriculum is aggressive, the pace is rapid, and the cohort model is central. Students who enter in later grades without prior exposure to the system are far more likely to struggle—not because they lack ability, but because they’re uninitiated. The burden on teachers to differentiate skyrockets. The pressure on classroom cohesion intensifies. And the students who’ve been there all along suddenly find their academic environment altered in ways that feel material. If BASIS were required to backfill meaningfully and regularly, it simply wouldn’t be BASIS anymore—at least not in the form that draws families to it. And that, really, is the underlying policy dilemma. The question isn’t just should BASIS be forced to backfill? The more fundamental question is: should schools like BASIS be allowed to exist at all within public systems, on the public dime (?). Because demanding full backfilling from BASIS is effectively asking it to become a different kind of school—more comprehensive, more catch-all, less specialized. There are reasonable people on both sides of that debate. But it’s important to be clear-eyed about what the tradeoffs actually are. The stakes aren’t limited to one admissions policy—they go to the heart of what kind of public education ecosystem a city like D.C. wants to have. |
Other BASIS schools backfill -- the incoming kids take a placement exam and are then placed in an appropriate grade level (which might be lower than they were before, if they were coming from an easy school). The DC Charter Board does not allow BASIS to do that. So, that's why BASIS DC doesn't backfill. It's not a huge conspiracy. |
Can’t they use other standardized test results? Surely there are the rare superspecial unicorn children who could join without dragging down the whole school and ruining the experience for everyone. |