Dude. Many kids are born with actual disabilities that have nothing to do with unhealthy lifestyle choices and/or bad parenting. But I guess if you’re including kids with behavioral issues not linked to a disability, then yeah that’s probably just poor parenting. With good parenting, kids with special needs can make progress toward their educational goals. But without good parenting, no amount of money is going to solve that problem. |
so many apologists for Youngkin not funding the schools! |
Umm… you’re kidding, right? Plenty of kids in APS with parents who have a downright hostile attitude toward school. |
Wah |
You see this every single day huh? Pray tell where? Let's all hope you're not a teacher. |
+1 The pandemic really brought out the teacher/public school haters. It’s truly disturbing. |
I’m the person who made the original parenting comment (that you called gRoSs), but even I think this chick’s comment is, well, gross. There are kids with actual disabilities. That’s not the same as bad parenting — you know, never bothering to read them a book, not caring about their attendance, allowing (encouraging even!) terrible behavior… Yeah, not the same thing. |
Yes, but (and I’m not the PP) it’s all relative. |
Tell me you’re a NA parent without telling me… |
Nysmith or Basis is your solution. |
Your frustration resonates deeply with the systemic issues we've been discussing about APS's priorities and resource allocation. Let me connect some critical dots:
The Current Crisis: Your child's experience isn't isolated - it's a direct result of misallocated resources and administrative priorities While your child struggles with unchallenging content, we have dozens of certified teachers sitting in Syphax offices instead of classrooms The money spent on maintaining our bloated administrative structure could fund: Dedicated gifted resource teachers in every elementary school Smaller class sizes allowing for true differentiation Advanced learning materials and curriculum development Professional development for classroom teachers in gifted education Before Considering a Move: The immediate solution isn't necessarily leaving APS - it's demanding better use of our existing resources We're paying for the expertise your child needs - it's just trapped in administrative positions Consider that your tax dollars are funding: Multiple layers of program coordinators who rarely interact with students Unused office space while classrooms are overcrowded Administrative positions that could be consolidated or eliminated Action Steps for Parents: Join the growing movement demanding administrative accountability Ask your school board representative why certified teachers are doing paperwork instead of teaching Request specific data on how many current administrators hold teaching certificates Push for implementation of a "teachers first" policy that prioritizes classroom staffing over administrative positions The Real Numbers: Each administrative position eliminated could fund 1.5 classroom teaching positions Returning just 20% of current administrators to teaching roles could provide dedicated gifted support in every elementary school The cost of maintaining the Syphax administrative center could fund multiple school-based gifted programs Before making a decision about moving or private school, consider joining the effort to reform APS from within. We need engaged parents like you to help push for: Immediate review of all administrative positions Return of qualified administrators to classroom roles Reallocation of resources to direct student support Implementation of proper differentiation strategies The solution isn't running from APS - it's fixing it. Your child deserves better, and we have the resources to provide it. We just need to put those resources back where they belong: in our classrooms, serving our students. |
I think APS should cut down on the administrators as suggested above, but that doesn’t do anything about APS’s current philosophy for gifted learners. The reason they aren’t providing real enrichment opportunities is because they don’t want kids to get further ahead than they already are because “equity.” |
The "equity" narrative being pushed by highly-paid administrators at Syphax is a perfect example of how disconnected they've become from classroom reality. While they collect six-figure salaries and preach about equity from their offices, they're actually creating more inequity by depleting classroom resources and refusing to provide appropriate challenge levels for all students.
Let's be clear: true equity means every student gets what they need to succeed. Instead, APS leadership is: Paying themselves handsomely while holding back high-achieving students Using "equity" as a cover for their failure to properly differentiate instruction Hoarding resources in administrative offices instead of classrooms Drawing massive salaries while our students struggle Real equity would mean returning these highly-paid administrators to classrooms and using their salaries to fund actual differentiated instruction that supports both struggling and advanced learners. We need to stop letting them hide behind "equity" while they drain our resources and fail our students at every level. |
What’s with ChatGPT posts? |
Let's talk about what really matters: "equity" has become a convenient excuse for denying challenging education to ALL our students. My child sits bored in class while others struggle to keep up - how is that equitable for anyone? Instead of policing how parents express their frustrations, maybe we should focus on why we're paying six-figure salaries to administrators who haven't taught a class in years while our teachers are overwhelmed and our kids are underserved. Our students need proper support and appropriate challenges to be ready for their futures - not bureaucratic buzzwords and administrative bloat. |