Hunter - the right got what they wanted

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He lies again.

Remember when fox news had to pay almost $1 billion for lying? Why are we supposed to believe anything they say?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

This is such BS. Weiss himself sent that very same House Judiciary Committee a letter earlier this very month that confirmed that he had some discretion to charge anything, anywhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think PP got the eviscerating wrong... Durham played the Censored Congressman from California 30th district

Dumb "I know you are but what am I" retort from Durham.

I suggest you listen to the entire testimony. Durham gets ripped to shreds and so many times had to resort to the most stupid and implausible kinds of responses like "I don't know, I don't follow the news" regarding HIS OWN DAMN CASE.

He didn’t say he didn’t follow the news. He said ‘that’s what I read in the news’ multiple times.

He did say that about an item that was actually in the Mueller Report and got caught on it - like why the hell are you talking about "hearing about it in the news" when you should have been reading about it in the files relevant to the case that is YOUR FRICKIN JOB

But to the point of the news, he DID in fact also a few times say "I don't know, I don't follow the news" several times as well, particularly when it was about what he was doing that was fodder for the right wing media. Falsely presumed innocence. What a hack.

He stated straight out that he was only going to talk about what was in the scope of his report. When he said he didn’t follow the news, he was being sarcastic about the way the news covered the fake Russia dossier, etc.

Oh puh frickin leeze. Any attempts at sarcasm from him were limp and pathetic and only showed him to be a partisan hack. And he tried that "that's what I read in the news" when they asked him to confirm how many indictments came out of the "fake Russia hoax" - it was 34, and how many acquittals - it was zero - some fake hoax - 34, THIRTY FOUR INDICTMENTS, and ZERO ACQUITTALS, and in half the time that Durham spent on his investigation, only to come up with jack.

Durham is a complete joke. And again, it's ridiculous that Republicans think "FBI cut corners and didn't fully follow procedure but were ultimately justified in opening the investigation" that led to the 34 indictments is somehow the "crime of the century."

I think Durham was weak. Your position is weaker still.

The history of investigators swore were strong until they didn't get the desired result and then got called weak: Issa, Nunes, Gowdy, Durham. You guys are always sure the next guy is a killer and then nothing comes of it, so you blame the messenger.

+1 Perhaps it’s time to admit that their fantasy of a politicized FBI desperate to undermine Donald Trump is not reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is such BS. Weiss himself sent that very same House Judiciary Committee a letter earlier this very month that confirmed that he had some discretion to charge anything, anywhere.

PP again, that should be SOLE discretion, not some. ALL THE DISCRETION.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is rich coming from someone as corrupt as McCarthy. How’s the wife’s family doing?

This comment, along with the others posted this afternoon, tells me that you all - the left - are worried about the corruption surrounding Biden.
No attempt at all to justify or explain it. Just an attempt to deflect to someone or something else.
Biden is going to have to answer to some of the accusations sooner or later.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's what RWNJs don't understand or are just plain being obtuse about: IF Hunter evaded taxes, fine. He made a plea deal and that's the end of it.

Contrast that with MAGA-types running around pretending that Trump won the election, insisting that the government is somehow out to get him despite literal mountains of evidence to the contrary, and screaming that the DOJ is somehow out to get him.

What LWNJ here don't understand..... this isn't about Hunter.
It is about Joe and his involvement in this scandal. He is corrupt and compromised.

I’m confused by this. Say Joe did take a bunch of money. Every conservative has been yelling very loudly recently that it’s actually fine for high level government officials to get expensive “gifts” from people who they have power over. So what’s the big deal exactly?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is such BS. Weiss himself sent that very same House Judiciary Committee a letter earlier this very month that confirmed that he had some discretion to charge anything, anywhere.

PP again, that should be SOLE discretion, not some. ALL THE DISCRETION.

So - this is in direct conflict with the WB claim AND the email that the WB wrote to confirm what he heard.
Looks like Weiss needs to testify.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Biden's son is pleading guilty on two tax charges and an illegal gun possession charge.

https://www.axios.com/2023/06/20/hunter-biden-charged-gun-taxes-plea-deal

You got what you wanted, justice. Now the right wing needs to finally stop yammering about him and the rest of us can go back to all of the Trump family crimes that have NOT been prosecuted or had any plea entered on them.

No more "yabut Hunter..."

As a whitey tighty righty, I can tell you if the right got what they wanted, he would be in jail and not having a sweetheart deal that no one else would be given.

This whole thread is built on a false premise and a DNC/DOJ produced narrative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's what RWNJs don't understand or are just plain being obtuse about: IF Hunter evaded taxes, fine. He made a plea deal and that's the end of it.

Contrast that with MAGA-types running around pretending that Trump won the election, insisting that the government is somehow out to get him despite literal mountains of evidence to the contrary, and screaming that the DOJ is somehow out to get him.

What LWNJ here don't understand..... this isn't about Hunter.
It is about Joe and his involvement in this scandal. He is corrupt and compromised.

I’m confused by this. Say Joe did take a bunch of money. Every conservative has been yelling very loudly recently that it’s actually fine for high level government officials to get expensive “gifts” from people who they have power over. So what’s the big deal exactly?

Not a "gift" honey. A bribe.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's what RWNJs don't understand or are just plain being obtuse about: IF Hunter evaded taxes, fine. He made a plea deal and that's the end of it.

Contrast that with MAGA-types running around pretending that Trump won the election, insisting that the government is somehow out to get him despite literal mountains of evidence to the contrary, and screaming that the DOJ is somehow out to get him.

What LWNJ here don't understand..... this isn't about Hunter.
It is about Joe and his involvement in this scandal. He is corrupt and compromised.

I’m confused by this. Say Joe did take a bunch of money. Every conservative has been yelling very loudly recently that it’s actually fine for high level government officials to get expensive “gifts” from people who they have power over. So what’s the big deal exactly?

Not a "gift" honey. A bribe.

According to Alito, there’s nothing wrong with that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Trump used a burner phone to coordinate during the J6 insurrection.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's what RWNJs don't understand or are just plain being obtuse about: IF Hunter evaded taxes, fine. He made a plea deal and that's the end of it.

Contrast that with MAGA-types running around pretending that Trump won the election, insisting that the government is somehow out to get him despite literal mountains of evidence to the contrary, and screaming that the DOJ is somehow out to get him.

What LWNJ here don't understand..... this isn't about Hunter.
It is about Joe and his involvement in this scandal. He is corrupt and compromised.

I’m confused by this. Say Joe did take a bunch of money. Every conservative has been yelling very loudly recently that it’s actually fine for high level government officials to get expensive “gifts” from people who they have power over. So what’s the big deal exactly?

Not a "gift" honey. A bribe.

Gee last week conservatives were proclaiming how Jack Smith lost 9-0 at the supreme court. In that case, Bob McDonnell was convicted for taking gifts in exchange for setting up meetings with government officials and hosting promotional parties in the government mansion.

SCOTUS overruled saying setting up meetings does not qualify as an "official act" for the purposes of public corruption.

[Anonymous]

According to the second IRS whistleblower

"Hunter Biden had had a lot of tax issues, even predating all this stuff. Back in 2002, he filed his Form 1040 late — filing and owing over $100,000 in taxes; 2003, owed more than $100,000 in taxes; 2004, late-filed and owed more than $20,000 in taxes; and then 2005, late-filed his personal return and owed over $100,000 in taxes."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:According to the second IRS whistleblower

"Hunter Biden had had a lot of tax issues, even predating all this stuff. Back in 2002, he filed his Form 1040 late — filing and owing over $100,000 in taxes; 2003, owed more than $100,000 in taxes; 2004, late-filed and owed more than $20,000 in taxes; and then 2005, late-filed his personal return and owed over $100,000 in taxes."

His history of evading taxes and such is quite something.
This piece outlines the testimony of Whistleblower 2.