Brad Pitt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's an obvious succubus, Brad seems chill.

Totally agree! She has tried to ruin him over + over. She is mad that she is old + cannot attract anyone; whereas, he can still attract countless women.

Tell me you don’t like women without actually using g the phrase What an anti-view of women you possess.

[Anonymous]

If he actually did this, he should be canceled. I think he did and he's trash.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If he actually did this, he should be canceled. I think he did and he's trash.

I think this is probably right.

[Anonymous]

This is sour grapes.

There's always 3 sides to every story: his version, her version, and then the truth. I don't doubt she believes this story.

It's hard not to believe she's bitter about Brad: his career is booming right now, he suffered no ill consequences due to what happened (whatever that was), and now he's suing her for breach of contract.

What does this story and her releasing it at this time even have to do with the winery lawsuit?

[Anonymous]

I’m amazed she kept quiet during his Oscar campaign. She could have single-handedly sunk his chances. So it makes sense to me she only spoke up because the children are okay now and because he tried to strongarm her with the winery when she just wanted her money out of that business.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is sour grapes.

There's always 3 sides to every story: his version, her version, and then the truth. I don't doubt she believes this story.

It's hard not to believe she's bitter about Brad: his career is booming right now, he suffered no ill consequences due to what happened (whatever that was), and now he's suing her for breach of contract.

What does this story and her releasing it at this time even have to do with the winery lawsuit?

She’s explaining why their deal for him to purchase her half fell apart, says he walked away because she wouldn’t accept a gag order. She didn’t want to be forced to remain in business with him, especially since she never had any say in it, so sold to the Stoli group.

This should be easy to prove, if he’s lying about her unwillingness to sell to him. I think she’s telling the truth. I think he’s the golden boy who’s never had to account for his bad behavior (see Angelina taking all the heat for Jen A).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If he actually did this, he should be canceled. I think he did and he's trash.

Traumatic event for the kids and mom and staff on the plane. You can’t undo or unsee someone’s rage and abuse. No kid can or will. It will erase 1000 good moments and be the one that sticks. It negates the others in a big big way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m amazed she kept quiet during his Oscar campaign. She could have single-handedly sunk his chances. So it makes sense to me she only spoke up because the children are okay now and because he tried to strongarm her with the winery when she just wanted her money out of that business.

This was out for awhile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If he actually did this, he should be canceled. I think he did and he's trash.

Traumatic event for the kids and mom and staff on the plane. You can’t undo or unsee someone’s rage and abuse. No kid can or will. It will erase 1000 good moments and be the one that sticks. It negates the others in a big big way.

Especially if the kids are prevented from/persuaded to never speak to him again.

Nice, Angie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is sour grapes.

There's always 3 sides to every story: his version, her version, and then the truth. I don't doubt she believes this story.

It's hard not to believe she's bitter about Brad: his career is booming right now, he suffered no ill consequences due to what happened (whatever that was), and now he's suing her for breach of contract.

What does this story and her releasing it at this time even have to do with the winery lawsuit?

She’s explaining why their deal for him to purchase her half fell apart, says he walked away because she wouldn’t accept a gag order. She didn’t want to be forced to remain in business with him, especially since she never had any say in it, so sold to the Stoli group.

This should be easy to prove, if he’s lying about her unwillingness to sell to him. I think she’s telling the truth. I think he’s the golden boy who’s never had to account for his bad behavior (see Angelina taking all the heat for Jen A).

The thing is, she was a crazy mother before this. And after this. So while yes, many of us believe this happened and that Brad did this - it doesn't suddenly make her into a good mother.

And also, she's broke and he's not. So she has all sorts of financial motives for the latest release.

[Anonymous]

I can’t stand either of them, but while it’s plausible he did this, it’s just as plausible she’s a bitter ex hell-bent on destroying him. I mean, she’s an aging narcissist from a dysfunctional family who isn’t well liked in Hollywood or by fans. And he’s still the A list golden boy beloved by all. That’s enough to drive an ex bananas.

I’m waiting for the kids to become adults and hear what they say. I’m wondering if any of them will run to Brad once they can.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is sour grapes.

There's always 3 sides to every story: his version, her version, and then the truth. I don't doubt she believes this story.

It's hard not to believe she's bitter about Brad: his career is booming right now, he suffered no ill consequences due to what happened (whatever that was), and now he's suing her for breach of contract.

What does this story and her releasing it at this time even have to do with the winery lawsuit?

She’s explaining why their deal for him to purchase her half fell apart, says he walked away because she wouldn’t accept a gag order. She didn’t want to be forced to remain in business with him, especially since she never had any say in it, so sold to the Stoli group.

This should be easy to prove, if he’s lying about her unwillingness to sell to him. I think she’s telling the truth. I think he’s the golden boy who’s never had to account for his bad behavior (see Angelina taking all the heat for Jen A).

The thing is, she was a crazy mother before this. And after this. So while yes, many of us believe this happened and that Brad did this - it doesn't suddenly make her into a good mother.

And also, she's broke and he's not. So she has all sorts of financial motives for the latest release.

Simply not true, but she wasn't as liquid because most of her assets were tied up in the winery. Why isn't she entitled to exit a business she had no meaningful role in to do as she likes with her millions? Especially involving an ex she now hates, seemingly for good reason?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m amazed she kept quiet during his Oscar campaign. She could have single-handedly sunk his chances. So it makes sense to me she only spoke up because the children are okay now and because he tried to strongarm her with the winery when she just wanted her money out of that business.

This was out for awhile.

The details of his choking one kid and hitting another in the face takes it to a whole new level. Before there were whispers, and mostly speculation he had said something terrible not been physically abusive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is sour grapes.

There's always 3 sides to every story: his version, her version, and then the truth. I don't doubt she believes this story.

It's hard not to believe she's bitter about Brad: his career is booming right now, he suffered no ill consequences due to what happened (whatever that was), and now he's suing her for breach of contract.

What does this story and her releasing it at this time even have to do with the winery lawsuit?

She’s explaining why their deal for him to purchase her half fell apart, says he walked away because she wouldn’t accept a gag order. She didn’t want to be forced to remain in business with him, especially since she never had any say in it, so sold to the Stoli group.

This should be easy to prove, if he’s lying about her unwillingness to sell to him. I think she’s telling the truth. I think he’s the golden boy who’s never had to account for his bad behavior (see Angelina taking all the heat for Jen A).

The thing is, she was a crazy mother before this. And after this. So while yes, many of us believe this happened and that Brad did this - it doesn't suddenly make her into a good mother.

And also, she's broke and he's not. So she has all sorts of financial motives for the latest release.

Simply not true, but she wasn't as liquid because most of her assets were tied up in the winery. Why isn't she entitled to exit a business she had no meaningful role in to do as she likes with her millions? Especially involving an ex she now hates, seemingly for good reason?

Yeah, the idea she should be expected to prop up his vanity business after their split is nuts. Also, I'm sure the nature of the business was galling given what his alcoholism did to their family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is sour grapes.

There's always 3 sides to every story: his version, her version, and then the truth. I don't doubt she believes this story.

It's hard not to believe she's bitter about Brad: his career is booming right now, he suffered no ill consequences due to what happened (whatever that was), and now he's suing her for breach of contract.

What does this story and her releasing it at this time even have to do with the winery lawsuit?

She’s explaining why their deal for him to purchase her half fell apart, says he walked away because she wouldn’t accept a gag order. She didn’t want to be forced to remain in business with him, especially since she never had any say in it, so sold to the Stoli group.

This should be easy to prove, if he’s lying about her unwillingness to sell to him. I think she’s telling the truth. I think he’s the golden boy who’s never had to account for his bad behavior (see Angelina taking all the heat for Jen A).

The thing is, she was a crazy mother before this. And after this. So while yes, many of us believe this happened and that Brad did this - it doesn't suddenly make her into a good mother.

And also, she's broke and he's not. So she has all sorts of financial motives for the latest release.

How so? More permissive and indulgent, yes. Like millions of other parents. I personally was sympathetic to his desire to impose more stability and discipline. But crazy? Be specific with your evidence, please.