Sure, but if he’s clean now (seems to be), any reason he shouldn’t have equal time with them? |
What’s plan B? |
Brad's production company. It has produced some Oscar contenders. |
And winners (Three of the production company's movies, The Departed, 12 Years a Slave and Moonlight, have won the Academy Award for Best Picture.) |
She's a former (?) meth and heroin addict. So it's not clear why he wouldn't have access to the kids for his former alcohol abuse. Her addiction appears to have by far dwarfed his and it is rumored she has continued to use meth 1x per day for "appetite control." |
Helped her craptistic "By the Sea" get made. Did Plan B help her Cambodian drama get made too? That film was decent. |
I think she probably takes a variety of pills for a variety of things. Amphetamines for energy and appetite suppression, Benzos etc. She's smart enough to work this legally now. |
| I can’t believe Jeff let’s you folks post these drug posts. I mean I know these folks are celebrities, but this is ridiculous. |
Eh, they've both been open about their substance abuse issues. A bit surprising she had no empathy for his issues given her own. I believe both self medicate(d) for mental health issues. |
She's been very open that she was addicted to hard-core drugs, especially heroin. She is on the record as saying that she smoked meth 3-4 times per day. She openly and regularly used cocaine. The rumor of her continued drug use for appetite control is so common that it was part of Kathy Griffin's stand-up routine. Angie has made Brad's pot and alcohol use a matter of public record. Why shouldn't we be allowed to talk about it? |
Or history repeated itself when she married an abusive, shitty guy like her mom did. We don’t really know. |
So you're just screaming "abuse, abuse" only to shrug a moment later and say you don't really know? Cool. |
| No evidence her dad had any of Brad’s issues. He cheated on her mom, apparently unforgivable. The irony is something. |
Probably because there is more to the abuse of child’s than has been made public. |
That's 100% not true. No consent is necessary as long as a photographer uses the images for editorial purposes and the images were taken in a public setting. No one has a right to privacy in public--unless there's an assumption of privacy like a public restroom, a store dressing room, etc. |