Trump 47 Economy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is this good?

Higher is better right?

[Anonymous]

I, for one, am getting tired of all the winning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I wonder if these workers are shrewd enough to connect the dots that many of the jobs were the result of Biden renewables infrastructure and their job loss is the result of trump squashing the incentives. And if so, will these trump voters twist their mind into a deformed pretzel to vote for trump again?

That area voted for Trump by something like 77-23 - it’s MTG’s district. So yes, deformed pretzel it is.

Democrats are not rewarded for helping rural voters economically. Probably time to stop trying.

The problem is that this is not the reason Democrats try to help rural voters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I wonder if these workers are shrewd enough to connect the dots that many of the jobs were the result of Biden renewables infrastructure and their job loss is the result of trump squashing the incentives. And if so, will these trump voters twist their mind into a deformed pretzel to vote for trump again?

That area voted for Trump by something like 77-23 - it’s MTG’s district. So yes, deformed pretzel it is.

Democrats are not rewarded for helping rural voters economically. Probably time to stop trying.

The problem is that this is not the reason Democrats try to help rural voters.

Regardless of the reason, they are targeting people who will not vote for them. They need to redirect attention to people who will.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I wonder if these workers are shrewd enough to connect the dots that many of the jobs were the result of Biden renewables infrastructure and their job loss is the result of trump squashing the incentives. And if so, will these trump voters twist their mind into a deformed pretzel to vote for trump again?

That area voted for Trump by something like 77-23 - it’s MTG’s district. So yes, deformed pretzel it is.

Democrats are not rewarded for helping rural voters economically. Probably time to stop trying.

The problem is that this is not the reason Democrats try to help rural voters.

Democrats policies help ALL voters. It is just that the rural voters let their racism and parochialism be influenced by the likes of Fox News and not, you know, history and rationality. They vote against their interests time and time again and now our country is on a path, perhaps irreversable, of being a global pariah.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I wonder if these workers are shrewd enough to connect the dots that many of the jobs were the result of Biden renewables infrastructure and their job loss is the result of trump squashing the incentives. And if so, will these trump voters twist their mind into a deformed pretzel to vote for trump again?

That area voted for Trump by something like 77-23 - it’s MTG’s district. So yes, deformed pretzel it is.

Democrats are not rewarded for helping rural voters economically. Probably time to stop trying.

The problem is that this is not the reason Democrats try to help rural voters.

Democrats policies help ALL voters. It is just that the rural voters let their racism and parochialism be influenced by the likes of Fox News and not, you know, history and rationality. They vote against their interests time and time again and now our country is on a path, perhaps irreversable, of being a global pariah.

I’m a staunch, loyal Democrat who has never vote otherwise, but come on. All democratic policies do not benefit all voters and we must not act as if no one is negatively affected by dem policies or we lose all credibility.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I wonder if these workers are shrewd enough to connect the dots that many of the jobs were the result of Biden renewables infrastructure and their job loss is the result of trump squashing the incentives. And if so, will these trump voters twist their mind into a deformed pretzel to vote for trump again?

That area voted for Trump by something like 77-23 - it’s MTG’s district. So yes, deformed pretzel it is.

Democrats are not rewarded for helping rural voters economically. Probably time to stop trying.

The problem is that this is not the reason Democrats try to help rural voters.

Democrats policies help ALL voters. It is just that the rural voters let their racism and parochialism be influenced by the likes of Fox News and not, you know, history and rationality. They vote against their interests time and time again and now our country is on a path, perhaps irreversable, of being a global pariah.

Then let them suffer for their beliefs.

[Anonymous]

Gasbuddy: We're in uncharted territory- if WTI crude holds these gains today- the current rise of 29.9% or $27.16/bbl would be its largest single day price jump- in both percent and amount- ever. Ever. EVER.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anyone out there looking for a job (other than minimum wage jobs) will tell you that the job market sucks (as does the overall economy). Didn't need a "report" to tell us this. I'm surprised that the BLS under Trump actually revised the number to reflect the reality on the ground.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I wonder if these workers are shrewd enough to connect the dots that many of the jobs were the result of Biden renewables infrastructure and their job loss is the result of trump squashing the incentives. And if so, will these trump voters twist their mind into a deformed pretzel to vote for trump again?

That area voted for Trump by something like 77-23 - it’s MTG’s district. So yes, deformed pretzel it is.

Democrats are not rewarded for helping rural voters economically. Probably time to stop trying.

The problem is that this is not the reason Democrats try to help rural voters.

Regardless of the reason, they are targeting people who will not vote for them. They need to redirect attention to people who will.

We aren’t going to change our values to get votes. We aren’t Republicans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I wonder if these workers are shrewd enough to connect the dots that many of the jobs were the result of Biden renewables infrastructure and their job loss is the result of trump squashing the incentives. And if so, will these trump voters twist their mind into a deformed pretzel to vote for trump again?

That area voted for Trump by something like 77-23 - it’s MTG’s district. So yes, deformed pretzel it is.

Democrats are not rewarded for helping rural voters economically. Probably time to stop trying.

The problem is that this is not the reason Democrats try to help rural voters.

Regardless of the reason, they are targeting people who will not vote for them. They need to redirect attention to people who will.

We aren’t going to change our values to get votes. We aren’t Republicans.

It’s not about values. It’s about priorities.

[Anonymous]