Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The pdfs are up and the date filed is redacted in all three. My guess is that they were filed very recently or absolutely no need to redact and probably all on the same day.
But wouldn't it still say something if these actresses are willing to go on record, even at this late date? As for Ferrer saying nice things about Baldoni, I don't find it implausible that a young actress would say those things despite being harassed, because she wants to work again. Of course, I'd expect Baldoni's team to probe why her public position changed.
That's IF this is all true, and I'm not trusting anything from Lively's side until it's produced and verified. I'm open to the idea that Baldoni did these things but don't want to fall for garbage again.
One thing that is weird is that if Lively's side was the one who leaked them, it's baffling why they'd choose to leak them in this way. These are apparently super pro-Baldoni "creators" -- even in their livestream they were casting doubt on the documents or trying to contextualize them in a way that didn't look bad for Baldoni.
So if the leaks came from Lively, that would be a very weird way to get that info out there when they could have just released it to People or something.
Which speaks to it being a hoax potentially. Though if a hoax, what a weird one! The specificity of detail is so high.
The whole thing is very weird.
Agree, it's weird for Lively to leak to these podcasters when these podcasters clearly hate them. Yet presumably Lively's side is the only one that would know what's in their amended complaint. Also finding it hard to believe that Baldoni's side would release reports of complaints by other female actresses on set, unless I guess they were ultimately going to be untrue, when the Ferrer allegations in particular make Baldoni look bad. I've been defending Lively, but to be honest I actually have trouble believing those allegations -- given the age of the actress they don't really fit into my picture of Baldoni. If these turn out to be real allegations by Ferrer, I would definitely make the SH case stronger, but I'll wait for the amended complaint to validate or not.
I think if the complaints are real, they may have been leaked by someone else -- someone at Sony or some other third party who got ahold of them somehow. They may have leaked to these people because they didn't know better, or they were the first people to reply to an email or something.
Cynically, if they are real, I do think Freedman might leak them in this way to try and get ahead of the story. He did that with the original complaint -- he leaked it to TMZ before NYT published (it's clear it was him because he's quoted directly in the TMZ piece, as himself, even though in the NYT piece his statement is identified only as "a representative of Baldoni").
I also think there's a good likelihood they are just a hoax designed to stir up controversy (success) and were "leaked" to this outlet because they would be a lot less scrupulous about checking the source.