You mean like there's unlimited numbers of genders? That science??? |
You mean the science behind the belief there are 57 genders? - or the science contained in former Harvard President Claudine Gay’s paltry 11 published research papers (which were mostly plagiarized) ? - or is it the science behind the Lucy Calkins reading method out of Columbia university? |
Newtons Law |
Why is this administration gutting the NIH, cutting funds towards cancer research and other diseases? The Rs in Congress support that. |
Lmao…they nominated RFK jr. They have no interest science, at all. |
His immigration policies get less and less every day, and he just keeps doubling down.
https://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2025/jul/20/opinion-americas-anti-immigrant-fever-is-starting/ |
I haven’t seen any in my deep blue district. All the Democrats that run have to essentially run and govern as progressives and therefore gut education. It is ridiculous to demand that I believe that the Democrats are better at education at this point. I see no evidence of that whatsoever in any touchpoints I personally have with education. Literally on every single point, the Democrats are worse. |
Then why are books regularly challenged that deal with racism, sexism, bullying, gay marriage, and non-explicit LGBTQ content? Even when there’s no explicit sexual content, Republicans will claim there is, because they define the very existence of gay people as deviancy. Any mention of homosexuality, any depiction of same-sex parents, and the Moms for Liberty types immediately jump to “perverts!! what are they doing in bed?” Notice how they don’t do that for the thousands and thousands of heterosexual people depicted in books. Shouldn’t we be challenging the Berenstain Bears? Just what are Mom and Pop Bear doing in bed together? They’ve had sex at least twice and presumably share a bed, which makes them offensive role models for children. If you find that weird and gross, you’ve just identified the hypocrisy behind automatically challenging LGBTQ content. As for “just order it from Amazon!”, for many kids, the school library is their only way to access books. Not all kids can afford to buy books. Not all kids live within walking distance of a public library. That’s a flimsy rationalization that allows people to feel good about blocking access to representation for the kids who need it most. It’s important for kids to see themselves reflected in books. It’s important for young people to feel empowered about who they are. It’s important for young women to understand and take ownership of their bodies. Taking these books out of school libraries sends a loud and clear message: “You don’t matter, your questions don’t matter, and your struggles don’t matter. Keep quiet. Society wants you erased.” This forum is full of posts whining about how white men feel hated and persecuted, but they’re not the ones being scrubbed out of libraries. |
If you actually understood science, you would understand what cherry picking is and why it doesn’t prove anything. |
There’s plenty of research on how brain structure doesnt always match external genetallia. It’s perfectly defensible to say that some people are born the “wrong” gender. |
In the department of philosophy, sure. |
I guess they don’t think much about clean water and clean air either. |
Look at crystal clear deep-blue-Flint water was! |
58.3 to be exact. |
This is a talking point. How do you think they are "gutting education"? What is the "every single point"? |