Trump 47 Economy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:181k jobs for the entire year in 2025!! I remember not that long ago, during the Biden administration, when that was considered a bad month, and headlines were all about a slow down and doom and gloom.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

NAVARRO: TRUMP WANTS JAMIE DIMON TO LOWER CREDIT CARD RATES


totalitarianism, or something...private sector, right? I thought the Dems were the "communists?'

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:181k jobs for the entire year in 2025!! I remember not that long ago, during the Biden administration, when that was considered a bad month, and headlines were all about a slow down and doom and gloom.

Post-pandemic, during the recovery and re-opening. Are you being deceptive, or are you obtuse?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:181k jobs for the entire year in 2025!! I remember not that long ago, during the Biden administration, when that was considered a bad month, and headlines were all about a slow down and doom and gloom.

Post-pandemic, during the recovery and re-opening. Are you being deceptive, or are you obtuse?

Who was responsible for closing the economy and leaving office with an economic disaster such that there needed to be a recovery?

All we heard for 4 years during Biden was "inflation" and "horrible economy" with specific outrages over eggs and baby formula, which had nothing to do with a president. And...what we learned was that inflation was a global event with most of the world in worse shape than the US. Biden managed a "soft landing" and left office with an economy that was "the envy of the world" - ever since trump's "liberation day" we have had nothing but economy chaos and job losses, so what was your point?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:NAVARRO: TRUMP WANTS JAMIE DIMON TO LOWER CREDIT CARD RATES


totalitarianism, or something...private sector, right? I thought the Dems were the "communists?'

More proof that Republicans have no consistent principles. Most of us realized it long ago, but welcome to the club!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:181k jobs for the entire year in 2025!! I remember not that long ago, during the Biden administration, when that was considered a bad month, and headlines were all about a slow down and doom and gloom.

Post-pandemic, during the recovery and re-opening. Are you being deceptive, or are you obtuse?

Who was responsible for closing the economy and leaving office with an economic disaster such that there needed to be a recovery?

All we heard for 4 years during Biden was "inflation" and "horrible economy" with specific outrages over eggs and baby formula, which had nothing to do with a president. And...what we learned was that inflation was a global event with most of the world in worse shape than the US. Biden managed a "soft landing" and left office with an economy that was "the envy of the world" - ever since trump's "liberation day" we have had nothing but economy chaos and job losses, so what was your point?

So you’re conceding the point that the large job numbers were directly related to the re-opening of the country?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:181k jobs for the entire year in 2025!! I remember not that long ago, during the Biden administration, when that was considered a bad month, and headlines were all about a slow down and doom and gloom.

Post-pandemic, during the recovery and re-opening. Are you being deceptive, or are you obtuse?

Who was responsible for closing the economy and leaving office with an economic disaster such that there needed to be a recovery?

All we heard for 4 years during Biden was "inflation" and "horrible economy" with specific outrages over eggs and baby formula, which had nothing to do with a president. And...what we learned was that inflation was a global event with most of the world in worse shape than the US. Biden managed a "soft landing" and left office with an economy that was "the envy of the world" - ever since trump's "liberation day" we have had nothing but economy chaos and job losses, so what was your point?

So you’re conceding the point that the large job numbers were directly related to the re-opening of the country?

? Up until Trump took office, we had job growth. Trump and poof! Gone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:181k jobs for the entire year in 2025!! I remember not that long ago, during the Biden administration, when that was considered a bad month, and headlines were all about a slow down and doom and gloom.

Post-pandemic, during the recovery and re-opening. Are you being deceptive, or are you obtuse?

Who was responsible for closing the economy and leaving office with an economic disaster such that there needed to be a recovery?

All we heard for 4 years during Biden was "inflation" and "horrible economy" with specific outrages over eggs and baby formula, which had nothing to do with a president. And...what we learned was that inflation was a global event with most of the world in worse shape than the US. Biden managed a "soft landing" and left office with an economy that was "the envy of the world" - ever since trump's "liberation day" we have had nothing but economy chaos and job losses, so what was your point?

So you’re conceding the point that the large job numbers were directly related to the re-opening of the country?

Who ever suggested otherwise? the alternative is what we are seeing now, which seems to be the GOP preference that we don't have people working in good jobs that provide meaningful income.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:181k jobs for the entire year in 2025!! I remember not that long ago, during the Biden administration, when that was considered a bad month, and headlines were all about a slow down and doom and gloom.

Post-pandemic, during the recovery and re-opening. Are you being deceptive, or are you obtuse?

Who was responsible for closing the economy and leaving office with an economic disaster such that there needed to be a recovery?

All we heard for 4 years during Biden was "inflation" and "horrible economy" with specific outrages over eggs and baby formula, which had nothing to do with a president. And...what we learned was that inflation was a global event with most of the world in worse shape than the US. Biden managed a "soft landing" and left office with an economy that was "the envy of the world" - ever since trump's "liberation day" we have had nothing but economy chaos and job losses, so what was your point?

So you’re conceding the point that the large job numbers were directly related to the re-opening of the country?

DP. You can go back further than the Covid years. Decent job growth is somewhere in the 2M jobs added per year ballpark. Last year's was 181,000. It's an order of magnitude lower than it has previously been. This kind of weak job growth was previously seen prior to economic downturns.

[Anonymous]

DP...re "economic downturns" seem to be synonymous with republican presidents.

Bush 41 left office with a recession.
Bush 43 left office with an economic meltdown
Trump 45 left office with an economic disaster

compare that to the democrats

Clinton: left office with a booming economy and balanced budget

Obama: fixed what W left and departed the white house with a steadily growing GDP and job growth.

Biden: fixed what Trump left and the right wing publications called his economy the "envy of the world"

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Is it the 300k government hacks that got their walking papers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Is it the 300k government hacks that got their walking papers?

You were lied to about that, too. Lots of them sued and got their jobs back, plus were paid for doing nothing while the litigation was ongoing. Pretty stupid way to run a government, right?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Funny that we don’t hear this from the media constantly 24/7