Republican Congressman-elect is a total charlatan with an entirely fake résumé

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously, how did this guy fly under the radar for so long claiming all this nonsense?

He really didn't. Too many voters in this district just don't give a crap for some reason.

I find it interesting that no Dem could beat Santos regardless.

Maybe because Dems didn't have the backing and influence machine of Russian oligarchs?

Again, we need to end dark money in politics.

Regretfully, the GOP is only in power because of multiple layers of cheating including dark money and they will fight it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously, how did this guy fly under the radar for so long claiming all this nonsense?

He really didn't. Too many voters in this district just don't give a crap for some reason.

I find it interesting that no Dem could beat Santos regardless.

I find it interesting that every lie he told was something the Republicans in that district would find commendable. Something they and their kids could identify with and aspire to.

[Anonymous]

Private school, private college, working for financial houses, big money transactions, deep investments, even a little charity with the fake pet rescue organization. Mom working as an executive in one of the towers on 9-11. on and on and on. Scary, scary dude.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously, how did this guy fly under the radar for so long claiming all this nonsense?

He really didn't. Too many voters in this district just don't give a crap for some reason.

I find it interesting that no Dem could beat Santos regardless.

I find it interesting that every lie he told was something the Republicans in that district would find commendable. Something they and their kids could identify with and aspire to.

I don't know. One of the lies was that he's gay-- he was married to a woman until recently. It's possible he is gay. Also possible that he was just going for an intersectional identity to seem more sympathetic. In any case, it is likely most GOP voters do not aspire to be a gay Brazilian.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously, how did this guy fly under the radar for so long claiming all this nonsense?

He really didn't. Too many voters in this district just don't give a crap for some reason.

I find it interesting that no Dem could beat Santos regardless.

I find it interesting that every lie he told was something the Republicans in that district would find commendable. Something they and their kids could identify with and aspire to.

I don't know. One of the lies was that he's gay-- he was married to a woman until recently. It's possible he is gay. Also possible that he was just going for an intersectional identity to seem more sympathetic. In any case, it is likely most GOP voters do not aspire to be a gay Brazilian.

Gay jew was the lie.

[Anonymous]

Why isn’t anyone realizing that Santos was purposely put up by Republicans?

The entire point of his candidacy was to break norms and see how much voters will tolerate in the name of ideology. There will be 20+ candidates in the mould of Santos in 2024 if this goes unchecked. The entire point of his candidacy was to normalize Manchurian candidates.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously, how did this guy fly under the radar for so long claiming all this nonsense?

He really didn't. Too many voters in this district just don't give a crap for some reason.

I find it interesting that no Dem could beat Santos regardless.

I find it interesting that every lie he told was something the Republicans in that district would find commendable. Something they and their kids could identify with and aspire to.

I don't know. One of the lies was that he's gay-- he was married to a woman until recently. It's possible he is gay. Also possible that he was just going for an intersectional identity to seem more sympathetic. In any case, it is likely most GOP voters do not aspire to be a gay Brazilian.

Gay jew was the lie.

GayBrazilian Jewish Catholic who is half Black, actually.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

This publication said they WANTED to endorse the republican.but this candidate was so sketchy and low quality they warned voters to stay away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This publication said they WANTED to endorse the republican.but this candidate was so sketchy and low quality they warned voters to stay away.

Stay away from Santos I mean....they did not discourage voting. They endorsed his opponent.

[Anonymous]

Heinz 57, this guy is. George Vandalay

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Heinz 57, this guy is. George Vandalay

Art Vandalay, architect.

[Anonymous]

Obviously, McCarthy will do nothing because he needs that vote. McCarthy will sell his children's souls for votes.

[Anonymous]

He's also a piece of excrement racist, it turns out

[Anonymous]

Do we know this guy's name is even Santos?