Dear God...not this again! We already went had this discussion a year or so ago. Every time someone says something negative about KKKayleigh, the "you're just jealous" poster comes out. |
Sorry - but when someone claims (yet again) that she was “low stats,” when she clearly was exactly the opposite, it’s pretty clear that person is green with envy. Regardless of her politics, there is no way to deny she was exceptionally qualified for HLS. Doing so just makes you look petty and well, jealous. |
I'm the PP, and not the person who criticized her stats. I don't give a rat's ass about Kayleigh's credentials. Or about the law profession and what qualifies as "high" or "low" stats in that arena. It reminds me of the endless discussions over on the college forum about academic performance and stats and what colleges a person got into. Is this obsession with Kayleigh and her "stats" a weird DC-specific thing or some sexual fetish? Most people's main objection to her--when she was actually in the job--was that she lied on a daily basis. Enough about Kayleigh's stats and posters' alleged "jealousy." I hope we never see or hear from her again along with all the others in the Trump clown car. |
|
wait, they don't give grades at Harvard Law? Say what now?
Is it just a diploma mill, then? She didn't have to attend class or write any papers? Was anyone in classes with her that can confirm how she actually attended? |
| Kayleigh was a “diversity admit” at Harvard. Seriously. |
You should ask Barack and Michelle Obama, Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan, Anthony Kennedy, John Roberts, and Loretta Lynch (among others) if HLS is “just a diploma mill.” We’ll wait. |
That’s nice. Again - when a poster claims she wasn’t smart enough to get into HLS, or other similar garbage, they’re going to be called out on their stupidity and probably called jealous. Especially when anyone capable of googling can see for themselves how qualified she actually was. She is extremely smart. That is what the previous post was in response to. I’ve helpfully bolded the post to which I was replying. If that wasn’t you, or doesn’t apply to you, you really didn’t need to launch into an irrelevant lecture. |
So to sum up, she's a liar and she's smart enough to know better. |
When all of those above attended, they gave grades. They stopped in maybe 2005 or 6? |
Just looked it up. It was 2009. |
Almost guaranteed that she did not have a high enough LSAT score and GPA to get in as a first year. She should release her scores. They will almost certainly be below the median for the first year class. Transferring is a game. Law schools do it to raise money (HLS doesn’t really need to worry about this because of their endowment) and to admit students who they think might raise the profile of the school (Kayleigh TV star and a conservative!), while not bringing down the stats and making HLS less prestigious. Only scores of first year students and reported and published and used in the ratings (in the aggregate). |
Basically en evil person. |