Reply to Kayleigh McEnany met with furious reaction after claiming she never lied as White House Press Sec

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Kayleigh McEnany met with furious reaction after claiming she never lied as White House Press Sec"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I cannot think of her without thinking of Angela Rye's epic eyerolls towards her.

I really thought at some point, her head was just going to explode from all the crazy mental gymnastics taking place behind those insane eyes of hers

[b]And I still think she did law school by correspondence[/b].[/quote]

:lol:  Of course you do.  So sorry you were rejected from HLS.  [/quote]

right, because everyone wants to go to law school.  :roll:

I just don't see how she was on CNN panels around the clock in person and somehow able to attend classes in Boston. [/quote]

[b]She transferred. Which everyone knows is how a low stats person gets in.[/b] HLS wanted her because of her fame. It is actually pretty gross of HLS. [/quote]

Gross of HLS to accept transfers?  “Low stats”??   :lol:  She did her undergrad at Georgetown, then started law school at UMiami - where she:  was a “recipient of the Bruce J. Winick Award for Excellence, a scholarship awarded to students [b]in the top 1% their class.[/b] The scholarship was established in 2011 in memory of Professor Bruce J. Winick, who taught law at Miami Law for 37 years and was a pioneer in the field of therapeutic jurisprudence.

Peter Nemerovski, Professor of Legal Writing, was impressed by the quality of McEnany’s work as a student in his Legal Communications class.

"Kayleigh is a creative thinker and a talented writer whose performance in my LComm class was excellent,” said Nemerovski. “Her role as a political contributor requires her to research issues and debate them on live television, just as law students must research legal issues and debate them in the classroom. I admired Kayleigh’s ability to balance the demands of the first year of law school with her appearances as a guest television commentator. I expect great things from Kayleigh in the future.”

She then transferred to Harvard Law for years 2 and 3.  She’s obviously highly qualified.  [b]It cracks me up every time you Bitter Bettys show how jealous you are.[/b]  [/quote]

Dear God...not this again! We already went had this discussion a year or so ago. Every time someone says something negative about KKKayleigh, the "you're just jealous" poster comes out. [/quote]

Sorry - but when someone claims (yet again) that she was “low stats,” when she clearly was exactly the opposite, it’s pretty clear that person is green with envy.  Regardless of her politics, there is no way to deny she was exceptionally qualified for HLS.  Doing so just makes you look petty and well, jealous.  [/quote]

I'm the PP, and not the person who criticized her stats. I don't give a rat's ass about Kayleigh's credentials. Or about the law profession and what qualifies as "high" or "low" stats in that arena. It reminds me of the endless discussions over on the college forum about academic performance and stats and what colleges a person got into. Is this obsession with Kayleigh and her "stats" a weird DC-specific thing or some sexual fetish? Most people's main objection to her--when she was actually in the job--was that [b]she lied on a daily basis[/b]. Enough about Kayleigh's stats and posters' alleged "jealousy." I hope we never see or hear from her again along with all the others in the Trump clown car.[/quote]

That’s nice.  Again - when a poster claims she wasn’t smart enough to get into HLS, or other similar garbage, they’re going to be called out on their stupidity and probably called jealous.  Especially when anyone capable of googling can see for themselves how qualified she actually was.  She is extremely smart.  That is what the previous post was in response to.  I’ve helpfully bolded the post to which I was replying.  If that wasn’t you, or doesn’t apply to you, you really didn’t need to launch into an irrelevant lecture.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics