Convicted murderer released early under new DC law again charged with murder

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Early on April 9, as a gang of young men who had invaded her Washington apartment looking for drug money held her, her mother and her aunt on the floor at gunpoint and discussed how they would kill the witnesses, 16-year-old Denise Michelle King rose to her knees and began praying.

In her prayer, the girl said she was ready to die, then asked God to let the gunmen spare her younger brother and sister, who were in another room, and take her life instead.

As Denise prayed, the girl's mother reached out and tapped the boot of one of nine young men, all armed with guns, who were in the apartment. "Please, if you believe in God, don't hurt my babies," Nancy Slaughter, King's mother, implored.

"Get off my shoe, b*tch," the young man snapped back. Almost immediately, Denise King, her mother and aunt each were shot once in the head. The younger children were not harmed.

From the WaPo write up of the original crime.

[Anonymous]

I am fine with restorative justice for nonviolent crime - property damage, theft, etc.

But not for violent crime. Violent people need to be taken out of society.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How does Charles Allen sleep at night?


https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/darrell-moore-second-murder-charge/2021/05/12/3786cf54-b2a6-11eb-ab43-bebddc5a0f65_story.html#click=https://t.co/GI1S3gcX7n

How does Charles Allen have anything to do with this? Why are you obsessing over him like a creepy stalker? Get a grip.

Charles, you know you were the champion of the bill that allowed this person to be let out of prison early, which enabled him to take this man’s life. Please stop. No one needs to be obsessing over you to know that you are the champion of violent criminals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am fine with restorative justice for nonviolent crime - property damage, theft, etc.

But not for violent crime. Violent people need to be taken out of society.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am fine with restorative justice for nonviolent crime - property damage, theft, etc.

But not for violent crime. Violent people need to be taken out of society.

+1

I’m not sure I agree with that. But the answer is surely not to randomly release violent criminals from decades in prison with no mental health or other support and expect them to become model citizens. However, it’s much easier for grandstanding politicians to pass laws without creating functioning infrastructure that reflects reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am fine with restorative justice for nonviolent crime - property damage, theft, etc.

But not for violent crime. Violent people need to be taken out of society.

+1

I’m not sure I agree with that. But the answer is surely not to randomly release violent criminals from decades in prison with no mental health or other support and expect them to become model citizens. However, it’s much easier for grandstanding politicians to pass laws without creating functioning infrastructure that reflects reality.

PP here. I certainly think that convicted criminals and their cases should be reviewed and that there are some who can be released. It shouldn't be politically motivated, and nothing about how those victims were treated in that original violent crime suggests that any of those perpetrators should have been released. How utterly tragic for his most recent innocent victim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am fine with restorative justice for nonviolent crime - property damage, theft, etc.

But not for violent crime. Violent people need to be taken out of society.

+1

I’m not sure I agree with that. But the answer is surely not to randomly release violent criminals from decades in prison with no mental health or other support and expect them to become model citizens. However, it’s much easier for grandstanding politicians to pass laws without creating functioning infrastructure that reflects reality.

Did Charles bill create this? Or did he put the wokeness cart before the reality horse?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am fine with restorative justice for nonviolent crime - property damage, theft, etc.

But not for violent crime. Violent people need to be taken out of society.

+1

I’m not sure I agree with that. But the answer is surely not to randomly release violent criminals from decades in prison with no mental health or other support and expect them to become model citizens. However, it’s much easier for grandstanding politicians to pass laws without creating functioning infrastructure that reflects reality.

PP here. I certainly think that convicted criminals and their cases should be reviewed and that there are some who can be released. It shouldn't be politically motivated, and nothing about how those victims were treated in that original violent crime suggests that any of those perpetrators should have been released. How utterly tragic for his most recent innocent victim.

Charles Allen also sent a formal chastisement to a judge who took into consideration the rape of a child during a home invasion while deliberating a release. This is who wrote DCs restorative justice law in 2020.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The system failed this child. We have no one to blame but a racist criminal justice industrial complex.

We have Charles Allen to blame. Everyone is responsible for their actions. It’s one thing to be ok with a kid stealing crap, but this does not deserve any remorse. This man is a horrible person and fully capable of understanding right vs wrong. Sure the system doesn’t help him, but he has no one to blame but himself. Sorry

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The system failed this child. We have no one to blame but a racist criminal justice industrial complex.

We have Charles Allen to blame. Everyone is responsible for their actions. It’s one thing to be ok with a kid stealing crap, but this does not deserve any remorse. This man is a horrible person and fully capable of understanding right vs wrong. Sure the system doesn’t help him, but he has no one to blame but himself. Sorry

+1 let's focus on helping the people who the system failed, but didn't commit violent crimes. Like the son and daughter who hid under the blankets. We can't save everyone, and not every criminal deserves a second chance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am fine with restorative justice for nonviolent crime - property damage, theft, etc.

But not for violent crime. Violent people need to be taken out of society.

+1

+1000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am fine with restorative justice for nonviolent crime - property damage, theft, etc.

But not for violent crime. Violent people need to be taken out of society.

+1

+1000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The system failed this child. We have no one to blame but a racist criminal justice industrial complex.

No, we have Charlies Allen and the woke folks at the restorative justice, hugs for murderers as punishment, city council. Fking idiots.

Maybe a e should start hugging murderers. Because prison isn’t working. It’s time to try something else.

Keep murderers in prison.

Execute

[Anonymous]

This quote stood out to me: "Prosecutors argued Moore did not meet the criteria for early release, noting that he had not earned a high school equivalency diploma behind bars, had not completed vocational training and had no housing or job lined up. They said his “reentry into society will increase his likelihood of reoffending.”

Was he given a chance at a GED, vocational training, or housing or job prospects while in prison? What happened?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This quote stood out to me: "Prosecutors argued Moore did not meet the criteria for early release, noting that he had not earned a high school equivalency diploma behind bars, had not completed vocational training and had no housing or job lined up. They said his “reentry into society will increase his likelihood of reoffending.”

Was he given a chance at a GED, vocational training, or housing or job prospects while in prison? What happened?

Again, Charles Allen should write in a series of wickets people need to reach to get consideration. And yes all that is offered in prison