Keep your kids home if you travel but otherwise no keep the schools open. I love seeing all the pics of these kids heading into the classroom for the first time in a year and their huge smiles (before the mask goes on)
|
Yes. But only the folks that travel. |
Nah. Many types of travel can be less risky than the types of in-person gatherings many locals are hosting or attending. |
It’s not an either or kinda thing. Super selfish on both. |
Well the pp I was replying too doesn’t agree. She thinks only the travel folks should quarantine. But in VA there is no quarantine requirement. |
It’s not required. But it would be the decent thing to do. |
People need to understand that covid positive students will be in school, and the administrators are OK with this. The protocol for a positive case is for the student to stay home for ten days, then return to school. They are not requiring a negative test. It is not clear if asymptomatic spread is really a thing. These people who maybe got sick at spring break can just follow the same protocols of staying home if they are sick, get tested, and stay home for ten days if they test positive.
Middlle school and grade school are low risk of getting infected and even lower risk of infecting others. |
So this is the problem, why should we accept Covid positive children being in school because you needed to go to the beach in March? Seems to me that the folks that feel like they need to travel should be the ones taking responsibility for spending a handful of days at home to make sure they didn’t pick anything up while traveling and not expecting everyone else to be the shock absorbers for their behavior. |
Teacher here and HELL NO! |
Annnnnnd you were correct. |
It should be that kids who travel or attend a gathering with people outside their household have to DL for two weeks. Anyone who doesn't travel or attend a gathering with people outside their household should get to go back to school. |
Lol! |
No, actually many have been hybrid since August. But regardless, how does that suggest there’s nothing to learn from their practices? Seems like they would be a potential model. But you do you with the bad logic and all. |
Kids are at low risk of getting infected by other kids, because the viral load is low. Maybe they got infected at spring break, though they likely would have been outdoors.
The same thing could have happened if they stayed in town. By the time a positive test happens, the peak contagiousness period has passed, though they are still contagious and that's why they have a 10 day quarantine. Why quarantine everyone over a small risk of infection and spread? Again, the schools are OK with COVID positive students in school, so long as they quarantined 10 days after showing symptoms or testing positive. They do not quarantine the students who were in class with students who tested positive. They do not require tests from students who were in class with students who tested positive. Why quarantine students who have not tested positive, just because they might have been in contact with someone who tested positive, might have gotten infected, and might be contagious enough to spread to others, when they are OK with students who DID come in contact with people who were positive, and students who DID become infected, and students who ARE CURRENTLY INFECTED? |