Is 2 Carat Too Big?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. I am looking on Blue Nile. I found a 1.5 ct. F, IF, and ideal cut. No fluorescence. I found a 2 ct. F, VV2, ideal cut. Faint fluorescence. Which one would be better?

Don’t bother with an idea cut. No one can tell. I probably would do the VV2. Much more bang for your buck. Unless it’s an emerald cut or something like that.

OP here. Both are round. Now it's time to decide between a solitaire or pave band. I'm think solitaire for a 2 ct. diamond.

[Anonymous]

Pave are a pain to keep clean.

Op, does she have a preference?

A friend of mine said, “I want a platinum and gold band with a marquis, but I’ll be happy with whatever he gets.” Um no.

Ask her friends if they can keep their mouths shut.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. I am looking on Blue Nile. I found a 1.5 ct. F, IF, and ideal cut. No fluorescence. I found a 2 ct. F, VV2, ideal cut. Faint fluorescence. Which one would be better?

Don’t bother with an idea cut. No one can tell. I probably would do the VV2. Much more bang for your buck. Unless it’s an emerald cut or something like that.

OP here. Both are round. Now it's time to decide between a solitaire or pave band. I'm think solitaire for a 2 ct. diamond.

Solitare is really a classic look. You can always get an eternity band later. Saying that I love the sparkle of a pave ring. I don't think you can go wrong either way.

[Anonymous]

Can I just say I'm super jealous of OP's gf? I didn't even get a ring. Blows my mind there are men who actually put thought and research into picking one out.

[Anonymous]

Blue Nile running close to $20k. I really hope you have the income. Going into massive debt for a ring is not the way to start a marriage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can I just say I'm super jealous of OP's gf? I didn't even get a ring. Blows my mind there are men who actually put thought and research into picking one out.

Ummm I'm pretty sure 99% or men put thought and research into this. Why did you say yes if you think your husband doesn't put in effort?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Blue Nile running close to $20k. I really hope you have the income. Going into massive debt for a ring is not the way to start a marriage.

I agree. I would check out your local jewelers. I helped my best friends husband pick out her ring and we got a way better price from a local place than what we saw online.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can I just say I'm super jealous of OP's gf? I didn't even get a ring. Blows my mind there are men who actually put thought and research into picking one out.

Ummm I'm pretty sure 99% or men put thought and research into this. Why did you say yes if you think your husband doesn't put in effort?

I was young and dumb. Wanted to be the low-maintenance 'cool girl' because I thought I'd land a better guy that way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My petit friend was a bit embarrassed by the (large) size of her engagement ring. So she claims it’s hard to wear in her job as a doctor and just parked it in a safety deposit box and only wears her wedding band. This is a very personal decision so make sure you know what your partner prefers. I, personally, would never want anything larger than 1.5 carats, but many would love a 2 carat diamond.

NP. That is why you always shop for rings together. The surprise of a ring isn't worthwhile if the recipient really can't wear it or has to pretend to like it when she would have preferred something different (and more wearable). OP, if you want her to love the ring and wear it for life, involve her in choosing it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP here. I am looking on Blue Nile. I found a 1.5 ct. F, IF, and ideal cut. No fluorescence. I found a 2 ct. F, VV2, ideal cut. Faint fluorescence. Which one would be better?

The 2 without a doubt. F VVS2 Ideal is a high quality diamond.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. I am looking on Blue Nile. I found a 1.5 ct. F, IF, and ideal cut. No fluorescence. I found a 2 ct. F, VV2, ideal cut. Faint fluorescence. Which one would be better?

Don’t bother with an idea cut. No one can tell. I probably would do the VV2. Much more bang for your buck. Unless it’s an emerald cut or something like that.

I would do 1.5 but I wouldn't do one that perfect. F or G and Vvs1/vvs2 will save you a lot and still be amazing quality with nearly no difference. I think the smaller size looks better (on me at least) and is more practical for daily wear. Don't throw money away just for the sake of saying you bought a 'perfect' diamond

[Anonymous]

I think it depends on her personality. Is she showy, loves designer clothes, likes to show off status? Go with the bigger ring. Is she more modest, frugal, and doesn't buy lavish things for herself? Then I'd go with the smaller stone.

I have a 1.5 carat ring, which I love... but as a lady who likes flashy things, I wouldn't have minded a bigger ring at all. I have friends who are more modest and would be horrified by ostentatious bling. If you're really not sure, then 1.5 is a good size because it's large but not one would ever think it's flashy. 2 carats crosses the line and will garner attention - women will always either be noticing and commenting on how beautiful her ring is, or raising their eyebrows because they think it's tacky and nouveau riche.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think it depends on her personality. Is she showy, loves designer clothes, likes to show off status? Go with the bigger ring. Is she more modest, frugal, and doesn't buy lavish things for herself? Then I'd go with the smaller stone.

I have a 1.5 carat ring, which I love... but as a lady who likes flashy things, I wouldn't have minded a bigger ring at all. I have friends who are more modest and would be horrified by ostentatious bling. If you're really not sure, then 1.5 is a good size because it's large but not one would ever think it's flashy. 2 carats crosses the line and will garner attention - women will always either be noticing and commenting on how beautiful her ring is, or raising their eyebrows because they think it's tacky and nouveau riche.

Well said

[Anonymous]

2 carats.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm looking at rings for my girlfriend. I was looking at 1.5-2 carat round diamond. Is 2 carat too big? Should I stick to a really nice quality 1.5 carat? Both will be good quality but the 1.5 carat will be slightly better. What would you prefer?

Short fingers or size 4 or 5 a 1.5 round might look better, and vice versatility, LNIG fingers or large hands and size 6-9 ring size, 2 could work.

Clarity and color matter too, a super sparkly 1.5>>> a 2.0 lesser color or clarity.