How neutral is Catherine Herridge

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is more neutral than everyone else at CBS, NBC, ABC and CNN combined.

You mean more like Fox News. She is a Fox News plant. Why would any reputable Media organization hire anyone who worked for Fox?

I hope someone will ask her about this. It is scare how sneaky and sleazy Fox News is. Before she gives a report it should be stated that she worked at Fox News. So people will know she is a part of the trump operation.

Wow.

Maybe you should check out all the Obama administration people who work for CNN and MSNBC.
And, Acosta is such a great reporter, too. Totally unbiased.

You realize the Fox News people went from Fox News into the Trump Administration. Not the other way around.

Not unique, now is it?
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/378628-trump-tv-pipeline-is-a-joke-next-to-obamas-media-hires

The Hill is not a neutral source: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/30/publishers-wife-played-undisclosed-role-for-melania-trump-345053

BS. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-hill/ It's about as neutral as you will find, along with the WSJ.
-DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't see how reporting Robert O'Brien's statement is in and of itself biased.

She reported her highlight and commentary on O'Brien's comment. In addition, has she reported other news which addresses the concerns from people about why Trump admin is not trusted on face value?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How neutral is CBS’ Catherine Herridge? Since she is with CBS, I assumed she is. But as I read her tweeter feed she sounds more and more like Trump spokesperson. This morning she is reporting NSC’ Robert O’Brian’s statement that Trump was not briefed about the GRU’s attempt of killing American soldiers. She has no comment about how many times Trump officials have lied to cover Trump’s a**. Heck, they lied about cyclone’s path so that Donald can say he was the genius with a marker!

Catherine seems like a unequivocal Trump supporter. Why does CBS keep a biased person like her as journalist?

She is hard over Fox News person. You can not believe a word she says. Her sources are all administration propagandist.

Provide a tweet or a story she has written that is not accurate.

It's not about being accurate alone. She seems to be providing a megaphone (highlighting and promoting what admin says) for Trump admin and omitting report about their inconsistencies, lies and corrupt behavior. That is why I feel like she is a Trump spokes person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is more neutral than everyone else at CBS, NBC, ABC and CNN combined.

You mean more like Fox News. She is a Fox News plant. Why would any reputable Media organization hire anyone who worked for Fox?

I hope someone will ask her about this. It is scare how sneaky and sleazy Fox News is. Before she gives a report it should be stated that she worked at Fox News. So people will know she is a part of the trump operation.

Wow.

Maybe you should check out all the Obama administration people who work for CNN and MSNBC.
And, Acosta is such a great reporter, too. Totally unbiased.

You realize the Fox News people went from Fox News into the Trump Administration. Not the other way around.

Not unique, now is it?
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/378628-trump-tv-pipeline-is-a-joke-next-to-obamas-media-hires

The Hill is not a neutral source: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/30/publishers-wife-played-undisclosed-role-for-melania-trump-345053

BS. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-hill/ It's about as neutral as you will find, along with the WSJ.
-DP

^^^ didn't read the politico link

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is more neutral than everyone else at CBS, NBC, ABC and CNN combined.

You mean more like Fox News. She is a Fox News plant. Why would any reputable Media organization hire anyone who worked for Fox?

I hope someone will ask her about this. It is scare how sneaky and sleazy Fox News is. Before she gives a report it should be stated that she worked at Fox News. So people will know she is a part of the trump operation.

Wow.

Maybe you should check out all the Obama administration people who work for CNN and MSNBC.
And, Acosta is such a great reporter, too. Totally unbiased.

You realize the Fox News people went from Fox News into the Trump Administration. Not the other way around.

Not unique, now is it?
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/378628-trump-tv-pipeline-is-a-joke-next-to-obamas-media-hires

The Hill is not a neutral source: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/30/publishers-wife-played-undisclosed-role-for-melania-trump-345053

BS. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-hill/ It's about as neutral as you will find, along with the WSJ.
-DP

^^^ didn't read the politico link

Did read the Politico link. Not only is Gross a longtime friend of Melania Trump, she is also in an UNPAID position.

"His wife, former CNN producer Pamela Gross, is a longtime friend of Melania Trump, and she volunteered to help the new first lady find her footing in the East Wing."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She can report the statement all she wants, but it is pretty clear at this point that reporting a statement uncritically or without context, which is something people like Wolf Blitzer have been doing for decades, is a disservice, because it is simply amplifying BS without context.

You, again, are used to reporters who provide opinion or commentary and don't just report the news.

It's not news when the president lies?

[Anonymous]

She is the same as Sean Hannity or Rush. It is disappointing she is employed for a major media outlet. Must mean there are some sleeper cells of Fox News in other news organizations. Should not be hard to expose who hired her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She is the same as Sean Hannity or Rush. It is disappointing she is employed for a major media outlet. Must mean there are some sleeper cells of Fox News in other news organizations. Should not be hard to expose who hired her.

What are you smoking PP? Hannity and Limbaugh are opinion and Herridge is a true journalist with a deep rolodex in the intelligence space.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is more neutral than everyone else at CBS, NBC, ABC and CNN combined.

You mean more like Fox News. She is a Fox News plant. Why would any reputable Media organization hire anyone who worked for Fox?

I hope someone will ask her about this. It is scare how sneaky and sleazy Fox News is. Before she gives a report it should be stated that she worked at Fox News. So people will know she is a part of the trump operation.

Wow.

Maybe you should check out all the Obama administration people who work for CNN and MSNBC.
And, Acosta is such a great reporter, too. Totally unbiased.

You realize the Fox News people went from Fox News into the Trump Administration. Not the other way around.

Not unique, now is it?
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/378628-trump-tv-pipeline-is-a-joke-next-to-obamas-media-hires

The Hill is not a neutral source: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/30/publishers-wife-played-undisclosed-role-for-melania-trump-345053

BS. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-hill/ It's about as neutral as you will find, along with the WSJ.
-DP

^^^ didn't read the politico link

Did read the Politico link. Not only is Gross a longtime friend of Melania Trump, she is also in an UNPAID position.

"His wife, former CNN producer Pamela Gross, is a longtime friend of Melania Trump, and she volunteered to help the new first lady find her footing in the East Wing."

The Hill also published John Solomon’s BS for years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is the same as Sean Hannity or Rush. It is disappointing she is employed for a major media outlet. Must mean there are some sleeper cells of Fox News in other news organizations. Should not be hard to expose who hired her.

What are you smoking PP? Hannity and Limbaugh are opinion and Herridge is a true journalist with a deep rolodex in the intelligence space.

+1
Some people don't like journalists who do due diligence like Herridge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is the same as Sean Hannity or Rush. It is disappointing she is employed for a major media outlet. Must mean there are some sleeper cells of Fox News in other news organizations. Should not be hard to expose who hired her.

What are you smoking PP? Hannity and Limbaugh are opinion and Herridge is a true journalist with a deep rolodex in the intelligence space.

+1
Some people don't like journalists who do due diligence like Herridge.

What journalism she has done in recent months which is not be a mouthpiece for Trump admin? Just "retweeting" (whatever the reporting term for it is in news word) Trump admin's statements is not journalism. That's called amplifying a particular (and in this case mostly propaganda) POV.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is the same as Sean Hannity or Rush. It is disappointing she is employed for a major media outlet. Must mean there are some sleeper cells of Fox News in other news organizations. Should not be hard to expose who hired her.

What are you smoking PP? Hannity and Limbaugh are opinion and Herridge is a true journalist with a deep rolodex in the intelligence space.

+1
Some people don't like journalists who do due diligence like Herridge.

What journalism she has done in recent months which is not be a mouthpiece for Trump admin? Just "retweeting" (whatever the reporting term for it is in news word) Trump admin's statements is not journalism. That's called amplifying a particular (and in this case mostly propaganda) POV.

Oh, please. She does plenty of reporting. She did not even tweet until she came to CBS. I heard her on the radio this morning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is the same as Sean Hannity or Rush. It is disappointing she is employed for a major media outlet. Must mean there are some sleeper cells of Fox News in other news organizations. Should not be hard to expose who hired her.

What are you smoking PP? Hannity and Limbaugh are opinion and Herridge is a true journalist with a deep rolodex in the intelligence space.

+1
Some people don't like journalists who do due diligence like Herridge.

What journalism she has done in recent months which is not be a mouthpiece for Trump admin? Just "retweeting" (whatever the reporting term for it is in news word) Trump admin's statements is not journalism. That's called amplifying a particular (and in this case mostly propaganda) POV.

Oh, please. She does plenty of reporting. She did not even tweet until she came to CBS. I heard her on the radio this morning.

Example please! I mentioned I do not like her retweeting lies - but may be she does some neutral reporting without being another Kellyanne Conway or Kayleigh McEnany.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is the same as Sean Hannity or Rush. It is disappointing she is employed for a major media outlet. Must mean there are some sleeper cells of Fox News in other news organizations. Should not be hard to expose who hired her.

What are you smoking PP? Hannity and Limbaugh are opinion and Herridge is a true journalist with a deep rolodex in the intelligence space.

+1
Some people don't like journalists who do due diligence like Herridge.

What journalism she has done in recent months which is not be a mouthpiece for Trump admin? Just "retweeting" (whatever the reporting term for it is in news word) Trump admin's statements is not journalism. That's called amplifying a particular (and in this case mostly propaganda) POV.

Oh, please. She does plenty of reporting. She did not even tweet until she came to CBS. I heard her on the radio this morning.

Example please! I mentioned I do not like her retweeting lies - but may be she does some neutral reporting without being another Kellyanne Conway or Kayleigh McEnany.

Give us a lie she has tweeted.
Check out her twitter feed. She has been following the Flynn case for years and reports on the documents that are released related to that.
She has covered a ton of stories, mostly national security related. She is an incredible reporter and you can trust what she reports.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is the same as Sean Hannity or Rush. It is disappointing she is employed for a major media outlet. Must mean there are some sleeper cells of Fox News in other news organizations. Should not be hard to expose who hired her.

What are you smoking PP? Hannity and Limbaugh are opinion and Herridge is a true journalist with a deep rolodex in the intelligence space.

+1
Some people don't like journalists who do due diligence like Herridge.

+2
It's clear that a lot of people here are accustomed to such biased reporting that they don't recognize real reporting when they see it.