Do you ever feel like your DH does not fulfill every interest/need?

Anonymous
This is why so many marriages end in divorce.

No one can fulfill EVERY NEED someone else has. Hopefully you have enough basic compatibility to have a strong relationship, but there are some things you need to get elsewhere.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:EVERY interest/need?! That's an insane expectation and you're setting him up for failure and yourself up for disappointment.


+1
Anonymous
I think it is closer to 50/50. There is about half of our lives that have very mutual interests and they are the fundamentals - value system, family, children, church, sports. There is the other half of our lives with different interests and that is what makes us different from each other - work, hobbies, personality types.
Anonymous
I've been married for 25 years and my husband has his preferred music tastes (as an example) and I have mine.
They have never converged. It would be strange if they did.

Let your spouse be their own person.
Anonymous
This cant be a real question. no my husband does not fill all those needs. Thats why I have girlfriends. I feel bad for your husband OP. You need to make some friends.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Men don't expect their wives to fulfill EVERY interest or need.

Just one particular interest/need.

Which very often goes unfulfilled...


Women have this problem, too.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Haha or any, yeah.


This.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Not in terms of sex...like talking film or books or whatnot.


Lololol! That's what friends are for.

If I had wanted to marry a woman I would have been a lesbian.
Anonymous
Ugh- this has to be a troll. What a ridiculous question.
Anonymous
My DH pretty much takes care of all of my needs. Good thing for him I’m low maintenance and very independent. I’m very thankful he happily takes care of the needs that usually require two people.
Anonymous
Ummm...I have friends. We talk on the phone when we can’t see each other.
post reply Forum Index » Family Relationships
Message Quick Reply
Go to: