New Royal Tour for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex - Fall 2019

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know that some people want this type of semi-nomadic life, but I feel bad for the baby. His cousins are having a normal British childhood while he will miss out on that.

I have to give you Meghan-haters a bit of credit: you can make even something positive for their family and the world into a dig on her parenting.

*slow clap*

That child will be exposed to the world and many cultures in a way that many children and adults could never dream. Besides traveling at this age is the best (especially with a nanny) because the kids don't need to be in school for until the age of 2.

And again, who cares? I mean let's be realistic here, Harry is basically his Uncle Andrew who is a nobody in the royal world. And their kid will just be known for the rest of his life as the biracial child of a Prince and his bride, that will be his greatest accomplishment because of people like Op who idolize him (and he hasn't done anything yet but exist). Meghan, well she is and was a grade B actress who was never very interesting in hollywood standards. She has a drunk for a father and that's about as exciting as her story gets. She is gorgeous when everything including her non makeup look is in place but she isn't all that interesting. She and Harry will ride off into the sunset together and bring awareness to impoverished countries but isn't that what most celebrities try to do when they want to appear charitable?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:do you really need to give us a play by play of MMs life? isn't there some fan site you can spam?

+1
MM was a C list actress. Just because she married a royal does not make her interesting. MM thread pops up here often due to/by POC. I get that. Maybe OP can start a fan site.

Lots of interest in the Duchess of Sussex. She was the most googled person in 2018.

https://www.inc.com/melanie-curtin/the-10-most-googled-people-of-2018-whod-you-look-up.html

Funny that you think only POC care about her. What about the Kate fans (who are truly, weirdly, bedazzled)?

Most gorgeous person according to whom, People Magazine? She is not the most gorgeous person in the world, not even by a mile.

G-O-O-G-L-E-D.

That means she was person most searched on the world's #1 ranking web engine in all of 2018.

Try reading please.

- DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know that some people want this type of semi-nomadic life, but I feel bad for the baby. His cousins are having a normal British childhood while he will miss out on that.

I have to give you Meghan-haters a bit of credit: you can make even something positive for their family and the world into a dig on her parenting.

*slow clap*

That child will be exposed to the world and many cultures in a way that many children and adults could never dream. Besides traveling at this age is the best (especially with a nanny) because the kids don't need to be in school for until the age of 2.

And again, who cares? I mean let's be realistic here, Harry is basically his Uncle Andrew who is a nobody in the royal world. And their kid will just be known for the rest of his life as the biracial child of a Prince and his bride, that will be his greatest accomplishment because of people like Op who idolize him (and he hasn't done anything yet but exist). Meghan, well she is and was a grade B actress who was never very interesting in hollywood standards. She has a drunk for a father and that's about as exciting as her story gets. She is gorgeous when everything including her non makeup look is in place but she isn't all that interesting. She and Harry will ride off into the sunset together and bring awareness to impoverished countries but isn't that what most celebrities try to do when they want to appear charitable?

Wow, for someone who doesn't care you've done a lot of analysis. You're the one who came up with the opinion that travel was bad for the baby.

Tell me, when Prince George was eight months old and traveling to Australia and New Zealand was that also bad for him? Is he developmentally stunted?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know that some people want this type of semi-nomadic life, but I feel bad for the baby. His cousins are having a normal British childhood while he will miss out on that.

I have to give you Meghan-haters a bit of credit: you can make even something positive for their family and the world into a dig on her parenting.

*slow clap*

That child will be exposed to the world and many cultures in a way that many children and adults could never dream. Besides traveling at this age is the best (especially with a nanny) because the kids don't need to be in school for until the age of 2.

Honestly, the educational value of getting exposed to the cultures of the world at age two is approximately zero.

[Anonymous]

I think this fall will be packed. Meghan’s first tiara event too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When will Kate start working again????

Dp. Hello Kate hater. You know she has been working.

Where/when? I have been keeping track, and she hasn’t had a significant work experience in ages.

I can't stand Kate, but seriously, isn't her job being a wife and mother and showing up for whatever mandatory events she has to attend?

No.

But also I think she has been working more lately.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:do you really need to give us a play by play of MMs life? isn't there some fan site you can spam?

+1
MM was a C list actress. Just because she married a royal does not make her interesting. MM thread pops up here often due to/by POC. I get that. Maybe OP can start a fan site.

How racist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When will Kate start working again????

Dp. Hello Kate hater. You know she has been working.

Where/when? I have been keeping track, and she hasn’t had a significant work experience in ages.

Don't you have a life?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:do you really need to give us a play by play of MMs life? isn't there some fan site you can spam?

+1
MM was a C list actress. Just because she married a royal does not make her interesting. MM thread pops up here often due to/by POC. I get that. Maybe OP can start a fan site.

How racist.

What’s racist exactly?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:do you really need to give us a play by play of MMs life? isn't there some fan site you can spam?

+1
MM was a C list actress. Just because she married a royal does not make her interesting. MM thread pops up here often due to/by POC. I get that. Maybe OP can start a fan site.

How racist.

What’s racist exactly?

DP. That only POC post about MM - implication that no one else would or could be interested.